similar to: HTB + VLAN: question

I have 4 VLANs which i would like to give different priority on our internet connection. I would also like to shape traffic, according to its FWmark, in EACH VLAN. I have created this setup, with a HTB classes in a HTB class in a HTB class. (3 levels). ROOT IMQ1 QDISC 1:0 | HTB 1:1 (HTB AT LINE UPPER LIMIT) |

Hi I have problems with shaping traffic running through a VLAN. I have done the following set up: I have a linux box a gateway. I wish to use VLAN on the internal interface (eth0). eth1 is connected to the internet. I will like to be able to shape the dowstream traffic. I have set up the followingon the gateway: vconfig add eth0 10 tc qdisc add dev eth0.10 parent root handle 1: htb default 2

Hi All, This is my first mail to the LARTC mailing list.I am having some problems with the download bandwidth over VLAN.The setup i am having at my place is somewhat below.. +-------------------+ | | | FTP Server | | | +-------------------+ | +---------------+ | | | | | eth1=|-------+ | My Box | | eth0=|--------+ | | | +---------------+ | | +----------+----------+-----------------------+ | |

Hello At first I must tell you that I´m a real newbie with Linux (and english as well...) I´m using 2 vlans and shaping works quite well without vlan Now I want to do load balancing at these vlans. Any vlan should get the same minimum/maximum bandwidth of download and use the bandwidth that isn´t used by the other one at the moment. But with vlan the shaping doesn´t work. Can you please tell me

Hello. I''m running linux box with Slackware 9.1 and compiled kernel 2.4.31 with "yes" to VLANs and "yes" to all QoS. On this box i have more ethernet interfaces: eth0 eth1 eth2 and so as more vlan interfaces: eth0.100 eth1.3 eth1.4 This is entrace(uplink) router to our whole network and my goal is to shape users on this machine. I want for this purpose use HTB so

Hi all, I am testing one QOS system, I want to control bandwidth by VLAN id. Here is my test network: Internet Gateway | | QOS control box ( Bridge box, Redhat 9, 2.4.28 kernel with ebtables-brnf-8_vs_2.4.28 patch) | | VLAN Switch | | PC PC In my QOS control box, it is a bridge box, I used Redhat 9, 2.4.28 kernel with ebtables-brnf-8_vs_2.4.28

Hello, I have a linux box sitting between (and bridging/firewalling) 2 LAN segments. I''m using Bridge/Netfilter/IMQ/tc(htb) to control (shape) mail/web traffic that traverses the 2 networks. The networks also have some VLAN tagged traffic flying around. My linux box behaves OK with VLAN traffic except that the shaping doesn''t seem to work. Normal http shapes alright but as soon

We are using VLAN tagging to put several networks on one machine. To ensure quality of service on one of the VLANs, we would like to prioritize (outgoing/egress traffic) one VLAN interface over the other (or others), but without capping bandwidth on any of the interfaces. We want to do this while being careful to minimize increases in latency on the prioritized interface. Since these are two or

hello. i have following setup: a machine (winChip 200mhz cpu, 32mb ram, linux 2.4.28) acting like a bridge with 2 interfaces (eth0 - to our ISP, eth1 - to our network) machine does not have any IP there is a 802.1q vlan eth0.2 eth0.2 and eth1 are bridged in br0 i have one 4mbit link which i share with my friend, i have 3mbit and he has 1mbit all our IP addresses are public and we have the

Hi all I have worked on HTB for the Customers traffic with VLANs working great, just b/w Limiting, not borrowing from each other class. but i never tried i high traffic Like 100MB internet Port with 100MB Traffic to internet iam trying to apply the rules in my Back Bone Router ( Linux RHEL AS 4.0) What is the people suggestion, how many of them in the list tested this kind of Trafic Just

Hi folks. This message may be a bit verbose and not as techie as the ones I''ve seen in this list, but describing the scenario will save a lot of messages. Scenario: A building with 17 floors, each floor with 24 offices (totals 408 offices) connected to the backbone through a border switch (1 vlan for each office). The offices can lease bandwidth of 64k, 128k, 256k, 512k, 1M and 2Mbps,

re I would like to do some firewalling and p2p shaping/limiting on one of the vlans in my network and I was thinking of using linux box as transparent bridged firewall/limiter. For this I''m planning to use AMD64 2.2Ghz box with 2 1gbit NIC (Broadcom 5721), that will be bridged. The box must be totally transparent and unseen in the network, as well as it should have much influence on

After some digging in openvswitch code. My wild guess is that vlan tag reconfiguring triggered iface_configure_qos (vswitchd/bridge.c), which in turn called netdev_set_policing to reset ingress policing rate. Although there's no ingress_policing_rate set in my case, existing ingress qdisc still remove by default. Could some openvswitch guy help to confirm and suggest how to fix or workaround?

Hi I''m use htb and as I think if I don''t setup default class, all other (not classified) traffic must going throw 0 class without any shaping But when I try to make such config all other traffic doesn''t transmiting. I have some clients on vlan connected with modem (routing, not bridging) So modem has own addresses I try shape clients not modems If no default - no ping

With outbound QoS setting in Libvirt XML, libvirt will add a tc ingress qdisc for traffic shaping. Then if you set VLAN tag to that tap device, this qdisc will automatically gone by no reason. Could anyone shed some lights where should I look into? I'm really confused and got no clue here. Thanks! Steps to reproduce -- # virsh start instance-name # virsh dumpxml instance-name ...

Hi, this is my Linux Box ---------------------------- LAN 1 -----|--eth1 <---br1--->eth0.1 | | \ | | eth0--|----- 802.1q tagged 1 Mbps link | / | LAN 2 -----|--eth2 <---br2--->eth0.2 | ---------------------------- I have to bridge the 2 lans

On Thursday, 7 April 2016, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> wrote: > On 6 April 2016 at 19:21, Subscriber <ml-lists at agoris.net.ua > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > Hello James, > > > > Wednesday, April 6, 2016, 5:34:26 PM, you wrote: > > > > > Note that this is pretty much the last use case you cannot use > > >

HTB performance improvement Hi all ! i''m looking at the performance of the HTB algorithm/implementation because i would like more packets/sec !! this is the scenario of the performance test: i''m using an embedded system with: SPEED CPU: 399,999 MHz RAM: 128 MByte FLASH: 16 MByte EEPROM: 8Kbyte PROCESSOR MPC8272 a lan to lan 10/100 and in particular we are sending

Hello, I use HTB with linux-2.4.20-ac1 and iptables-1.2.7a (pathced for IMQ). I configured one HTB qdisc on an IMQ device. This qdisc has some classes (about 5) and all of the classes has qdisc pfifo. I sometimes got out from my linux (while I was working) and I found in logs: Dec 4 11:49:27 core kernel: HTB init, kernel part version 3.7 Dec 4 11:49:28 core kernel: HTB: quantum of class

Hi, Hopefully this won''t be too off-topic (I''ve seen both bonding & vlan mentioned on the list, but not really together). I''ve tried to get bonding (2 x 100Mb EEPro, but will want to try on 1000BaseT) and vlans to work together, but without luck. I can get them working fine (seemingly at least - I didn''t tried bursting on the bonded port) individually.