similar to: u32 filter and NAT

Hi Nithya, I see index in context: [2017-07-07 10:07:18.230202] E [MSGID: 106062] [glusterd-utils.c:7997:glusterd_volume_rebalance_use_rsp_dict] 0-glusterd: failed to get index I wonder if there is anything I can do to fix it. I was trying to strace gluster process but still have no clue what exactly is gluster index. Best regards, Szymon Miotk On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Nithya

Hi Szymon, I have received the files and will take a look and get back to you. In what context are you seeing index? Thanks, Nithya On 11 July 2017 at 01:15, Szymon Miotk <szymon.miotk at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Nithya, > > the files were sent to priv to avoid spamming the list with large > attachments. > Could someone explain what is index in Gluster? > Unfortunately

Hi Nithya, the files were sent to priv to avoid spamming the list with large attachments. Could someone explain what is index in Gluster? Unfortunately index is popular word, so googling is not very helpful. Best regards, Szymon Miotk On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> wrote: > > On 7 July 2017 at 15:42, Szymon Miotk <szymon.miotk at

Where did you read 2k IOPS? Each disk is able to do about 75iops as I'm using SATA disk, getting even closer to 2000 it's impossible Il 13 ott 2017 9:42 AM, "Szymon Miotk" <szymon.miotk at gmail.com> ha scritto: > Depends what you need. > 2K iops for small file writes is not a bad result. > In my case I had a system that was just poorly written and it was >

On 7 July 2017 at 15:42, Szymon Miotk <szymon.miotk at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > > I have problem rebalancing Gluster volume. > Gluster version is 3.7.3. > My 1x3 replicated volume become full, so I've added three more bricks > to make it 2x3 and wanted to rebalance. > But every time I start rebalancing, it fails immediately. > Rebooting Gluster

Hello everyone, I have problem rebalancing Gluster volume. Gluster version is 3.7.3. My 1x3 replicated volume become full, so I've added three more bricks to make it 2x3 and wanted to rebalance. But every time I start rebalancing, it fails immediately. Rebooting Gluster nodes doesn't help. # gluster volume rebalance gsae_artifactory_cluster_storage start volume rebalance:

Hi! I got some strange problem with routing loadbalancing. I cannot get the full speed from my ISPs until I get some big files from close ftp server. I have server with one connection to internal network and 3 to ISPs: __________ | eth1|---- ISP1 | | internal--|eth0 eth2|---- ISP2 net | | (~300 | eth3|---- ISP3 hosts

Hi! I have some problems with htb performance. THE SETUP: I have a network with 3 ISP uplinks and 1 local network uplink. There are about 1700 clients. I was shaping their bandwidth with HTB using iptables mangling in a manner: tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:10 classid 1:${CLASS_ID} htb rate \ 16kbit ceil 512kbit burst 2kb prio 2 quantum 1500 tc qdisc add dev $DEV parent 1:${CLASS_ID}

Hello! I have access server with 4 uplinks (nice, huh?). I ran RedHat 7.3. Yesterday I did an upgrade to RedHat 9. After upgrade Linux says the third link is bad: # ip route show 2.2.2.0/30 dev eth2 scope link src 2.2.2.2 4.4.4.0/30 dev eth4 scope link src 4.4.4.4 3.3.3.0/29 dev eth3 scope link src 3.3.3.3 1.1.1.0/28 dev eth1 scope link src 1.1.1.1 10.1.1.0/24 dev eth0 scope link

Hi! I really need help with a u32 filter that won''t match what I think I''m telling it to. The situation is that I have set up an internal computer to change the TOS value of packets sent by certain processes to 0x1E (If anyone known of a better way to mark packets, please tell me. I would love to find some module that adds an IP option with UIDs and GIDs to the packets - does

Hello lartc, Q1: If I want select subhet, I wrote ...u32 match ip dst a.d.r.es/net police ... How I can say "all except z.x.y" ? Both src/dest addr/port - I foundn''t this info in HOWTO :((( Q2: Why I can''t (or not allowed) to create more then one class into !ingress! queue? I know, it''s incoming trafic? but why? it''s look simply: (yes, i may be

Hello lartc! I have strange problem setting load balancing over 4 interfaces. Something won''t accept more than 3 interfaces, While setting: ip route add default scope global \ nexthop via 0.0.0.0 dev pvc0 weight 1 \ nexthop via 0.0.0.0 dev pvc1 weight 1 \ nexthop via 0.0.0.0 dev pvc2 weight 1 It''s ok: ip r l default nexthop dev pvc0

Hi, I have a mini router that have this feature, "clone MAC address" My ISP doesn''t allow me to connect more than one computer. But, with the "clone MAC address" of the mini router, I can connect up to 5 computers, and my ISP can''t notice that. What do I need to do this "clonning" with my linux box? Thanks, Nico

Hi, I can''t get traffic shaping working. This is my situation: -------- ------ Net1 ----- |router| -------------------- | TC | ----------- Net2 -------- leased line ------ eth1 eth0 We use the leased line for normal traffic but also for synchronisation between 2 servers. The leased line is 2mbit. The synchronisation

Hi guys I have a config as follows for one of my networks. I want to give the xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/xx network 64kbit for everything from the internet but 8000kbit from our internal servers on yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy/yy network. It does not work. I only want to use u32 filters. I think what's happening is the first flowid of 1:21 is catching them and not getting to the 1:40 flowid. Is this right? The box

Is there a flow diagram as to where tc actions take place with respect to NAT and other iptables functions on a multihomed box (private & public NICs) ? Are tc filter rules consulted before or after NATing? My real interest is in basic understanding first, and then solving a real problem second. Example: Firewall Public NIC 123.123.123.1 Firewall Private NIC 192.168.168.1 Dedicated Video

hello... 1. Is it possible using u32 to filter marked packets? I have found only documents to fw filter to filter marked packets... 2. If u32 cannot filter marked packets is it possible to use fw and u32 together? I wanted to filter packets marked by iptables by fw, and packets depended on ip destination, src and others by u32, but something goes wrong :( the filters configuration is: $TC

You could compile Speex as a DLL (see libspeex_dynamic.dsp) and use PInvoke. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PInvoke Note that Speex will still be executing as unmanaged code and your program will have the added dependency of the native Speex DLL. It appears that someone created a "Speex.NET" based on JSpeex, but I didn't find any useful info on it. You may want to search for this

Hi, All, My understanding is u32 filter is very powerful filter and could do anything about IP header filtering, then why do we sometimes use netfilering in IPtables? One advantege I guess is in netfilering, there is usage counter? Are there other advantges using netfilter (such as delay, flexibility)? What is the disadvantages to us Netfilter? In summary, what are the considerations to select

Hello! I''ve noticed a strange thing: when a client system generates an arp query for an unexistent host, the routing cache entry is being made. My system is Fedora 2 with vanilla 2.6.11. the client is 10.1.1.2 with mask 255.255.0.0 the router/firewall is 10.1.1.1 with mask 255.255.255.0 Yes, the masks are different and this cannot be fixed easily. So, when the client generates ARP