similar to: wrong number of arguments (1 for 0) when using respond_to?

Hi, For some reason, this harmless block of code in my application controller def index @wide = true end is causing this hideous error. I have read the error means that the error is raised when attribute has a name reserved by ActiveRecord. Does that mean that none of my models can have columns named "toggle"? Here is the error and framework trace:

Hello, I have a freeze field in a table (that I can''t change). When I try to find a record in this table I have the exception : C:/DATA/InstantRails-2.0/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ activerecord-2.1.0/lib/active_record/attribute_methods.rb:104:in `instance_method_already_implemented?'' C:/DATA/InstantRails-2.0/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/

In my attempt to add AM:Dirty to my model I realized that AM#AttributeMethods is a bit imperfect. It''s impossible to generate attribute methods step-by-step in DataMapper-like manner. class Model include ActiveModel::Dirty def self.property(name, klass = String) define_property_accessors(name, klass) # This method will be called once, because of

I have a custom authentication plugin that redirects users to a login site if they aren''t already authenticated and their session hasn''t timed out. I had things working fine with straight http requests, but wanted to add support for ajax requests. I thought this would be a simple matter of replacing all of my "redirect_to <blah> and return false" calls with

I''m having a problem in Rails 2 where respond_to is always rendering the RXML view even in the HTML rendering response. Can anyone tell me why this might be happening? Here''s a code snippet: respond_to do |accepts| accepts.html accepts.xml { render :action => ''show.rxml'', :layout => false} end If I change this to the following it works fine:

acts_as_ferret''s search results use #method_missing to forward method calls to the underlying result object. However, those methods are represented in #respond_to? Here''s a simple fix for that: module FerretMixin module Acts module ARFerret class SearchResults def respond_to?(name) self.methods.include?(name) || @results.respond_to?(name)

Hi everyone, I am a bit confused with xhr? and respond_to. I have the folloing code in my view to update the ''emails'' ID link_to_remote(image_tag("refresh"), :update => "emails", :url => { :action => "list_emails" }) in the controller side i have somthing like : [..] respond_to do |type| type.html { render :action

Is there a way to add a mime type of my own to respond_to ? There''s html, xml, js, ical etc ... But I want to be able to respond_to Excel. Excel has the following content-type header: application/vnd.ms-excel I want to use the new ?format=xml querystring parameters that respond_to can respond to. So I want to pass in ?format=xsl or ?format=ms-excel so that I can return my results

After reading: <http://www.loudthinking.com/arc/000572.html> I''m trying to experiment with respond_to in order to not repeat myself and create atom feeds out of a "browse" view. In application controller I created a before filter that checks for the extension of the current url and changes the accept header: [code] def check_headers @headers["Accept"]

Hello List, I''m trying to generate examples for some list-helpers I have coded which use in my projects. Basically, the Playlist class uses one anonymous module in has_many that acts as helper between acts_as_list and my desired API: class Playlist < ActiveRecord::Base # associations go here has_many :playlist_items, :order => :position, :dependent => :destroy has_many

Hi everyone, I am stuck in an (apparently) simple problem. In my event_controller I have the i_like_it action: def i_like_it @event = Event.find(params[:id]) ... # logic respond_to do |format| format.js end end In my case "i_like_it" is called with :method => PUT (it is an Ajax call, "i_like_it.js.erb" will be returned as a script and it wil be

Hi all, I''m submitting a form using jQuery, but in the respond_to block only the format.html action is called. This is the javascrip: send_button.on(''click'', function(){ var form = $(this).closest(''.modal'').find(''form''); $.post(''/messages'', form.serialize(), function(data, status, xhr){

I''m having some trouble with respond_to to handle multiple request types from a single action. The action: def login return if request.get? #just show the login.rhtml page on HTTP GET self.current_user = User.authenticate(params[:login], params[:password]) respond_to do |type| type.js { render } # renders login.rjs type.html do #fallback for standard

Hello All, I''m trying to figure out how respond_to actually works, especially with the increased focus on REST. After I set a MIME type for Excel Mime::Type.register "application/vnd.ms-excel", :xls In my index action''s respond_to block I have format.xls { @parts = Part.find(:all) headers[''Content-Type''] =

I am playing around with the idea of adding to the HTTP_ACCEPT header method and trying to utilize WURFL for detecting mobile devices by USER_AGENT instead. I''m thinking I will set up some kind of before_filter in my controller, to intercept all requests and compare the USER_AGENT to some data source. If I detect that the USER_AGENT is a mobile device, then I''d like to force a

Greetings, How would I go about handling an unknown type in a respond_to block? That is, I currently have ... respond_to do | format | format.html { do something } format.xml { do something else } end I would like a handler for all other format''s, other than html/xml, so that I can, for example, log the request, render an error or whatnot. Thank you, ]{

Searched around this forum, but didn''t find an answer for this question. Can you help this newbie understand any overlap and/or difference between request.xhr? and respond_to? If request.xhr? is true, should I expect it wants.js below? respond_to do |wants| wants.html { redirect_to(person_list_url) } wants.js wants.xml { render :xml => @person.to_xml(:include

I''m trying to use respond_to to redirect visitors who have JS turned off to a different page. The problem I''m having is that respond_to is sending *everybody* there. It''s not recognizing that JS is turned on in the browser. The wanted_html.rhtml file below is rendered whether I''ve got JS turned on or off. I''ve looked at the Accept headers being sent

I''m trying to use the exception notifier plugin and I''m getting this error message: NoMethodError (undefined method `respond_to'' for #<Adm::PeriodController:0xb74c9804>): /vendor/plugins/exception_notification/lib/exception_notifiable.rb:64:in `render_500'' /vendor/plugins/exception_notification/lib/exception_notifiable.rb:76:in

In my controllers I have a respond_to block for both fbml and fbjs. I created the fbjs mime type in environment.rb: Mime::Type.register "application/javascript", :fbjs However, even if I specify fbjs in a parameter name format during AJAX post requests, it is being overwritten by Rails or Facebooker as FBML. I confirmed this by placing logger.debug params[:format] immediately before