similar to: Problem with third link in multiple uplink configuration

Hi Nithya, I see index in context: [2017-07-07 10:07:18.230202] E [MSGID: 106062] [glusterd-utils.c:7997:glusterd_volume_rebalance_use_rsp_dict] 0-glusterd: failed to get index I wonder if there is anything I can do to fix it. I was trying to strace gluster process but still have no clue what exactly is gluster index. Best regards, Szymon Miotk On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Nithya

Hi Szymon, I have received the files and will take a look and get back to you. In what context are you seeing index? Thanks, Nithya On 11 July 2017 at 01:15, Szymon Miotk <szymon.miotk at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Nithya, > > the files were sent to priv to avoid spamming the list with large > attachments. > Could someone explain what is index in Gluster? > Unfortunately

Where did you read 2k IOPS? Each disk is able to do about 75iops as I'm using SATA disk, getting even closer to 2000 it's impossible Il 13 ott 2017 9:42 AM, "Szymon Miotk" <szymon.miotk at gmail.com> ha scritto: > Depends what you need. > 2K iops for small file writes is not a bad result. > In my case I had a system that was just poorly written and it was >

Hi Nithya, the files were sent to priv to avoid spamming the list with large attachments. Could someone explain what is index in Gluster? Unfortunately index is popular word, so googling is not very helpful. Best regards, Szymon Miotk On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> wrote: > > On 7 July 2017 at 15:42, Szymon Miotk <szymon.miotk at

On 7 July 2017 at 15:42, Szymon Miotk <szymon.miotk at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > > I have problem rebalancing Gluster volume. > Gluster version is 3.7.3. > My 1x3 replicated volume become full, so I've added three more bricks > to make it 2x3 and wanted to rebalance. > But every time I start rebalancing, it fails immediately. > Rebooting Gluster

Hello everyone, I have problem rebalancing Gluster volume. Gluster version is 3.7.3. My 1x3 replicated volume become full, so I've added three more bricks to make it 2x3 and wanted to rebalance. But every time I start rebalancing, it fails immediately. Rebooting Gluster nodes doesn't help. # gluster volume rebalance gsae_artifactory_cluster_storage start volume rebalance:

Hi! I got some strange problem with routing loadbalancing. I cannot get the full speed from my ISPs until I get some big files from close ftp server. I have server with one connection to internal network and 3 to ISPs: __________ | eth1|---- ISP1 | | internal--|eth0 eth2|---- ISP2 net | | (~300 | eth3|---- ISP3 hosts

Hi! I have some problems with htb performance. THE SETUP: I have a network with 3 ISP uplinks and 1 local network uplink. There are about 1700 clients. I was shaping their bandwidth with HTB using iptables mangling in a manner: tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:10 classid 1:${CLASS_ID} htb rate \ 16kbit ceil 512kbit burst 2kb prio 2 quantum 1500 tc qdisc add dev $DEV parent 1:${CLASS_ID}

I want to limit each user in my network to have limited bandwidth (let''s say 256/128 kbit). I use NAT (done with iptables). Can I limit users on the outgoing interface using u32 using rules like: tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip prio 17 u32 match ip src 10.10.10.10 flowid 1:10 It seem I made a mistake somewhere or NAT is done before routing and I must use iptables

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70 Summary: udp connection(snmp) not being tracked. Product: netfilter/iptables Version: patch-o-matic Platform: All OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: connection tracking AssignedTo:

Hello! I''ve noticed a strange thing: when a client system generates an arp query for an unexistent host, the routing cache entry is being made. My system is Fedora 2 with vanilla 2.6.11. the client is 10.1.1.2 with mask 255.255.0.0 the router/firewall is 10.1.1.1 with mask 255.255.255.0 Yes, the masks are different and this cannot be fixed easily. So, when the client generates ARP

Hello lartc! I have strange problem setting load balancing over 4 interfaces. Something won''t accept more than 3 interfaces, While setting: ip route add default scope global \ nexthop via 0.0.0.0 dev pvc0 weight 1 \ nexthop via 0.0.0.0 dev pvc1 weight 1 \ nexthop via 0.0.0.0 dev pvc2 weight 1 It''s ok: ip r l default nexthop dev pvc0

We have a Linux box that is acting as the gateway to the internet for about 400 people, typically there are not more then 50 of them using the internet at any given time. We would like to provide different levels of access to different users. For example 128kbps to some users and 256kbps to others. We have considered creating a class and qdisc for each user (using htb) however we don''t

Hi! The Netfilter project proudly presents: nftables 0.8 This release contains new features available up to the (upcoming) Linux 4.14 kernel release: * Support for stateful objects, these objects are uniquely identified by a user-defined name, you can refer to them from rules, and there is a well established interface to operate with them, eg. # nft add counter filter test

For easy reading: http://www.karthaus.nl/r/ Hi, We used to have 1 single ip range (1.1.1.0/24) that had one uplink to a = switch of the colocation provider. Recently we got a second range 2.2.2.0/24 and a redundant uplink = directly on two routers. But our switch does not have spanning tree = protocol support so we cannot use them redundantly. We have set up the switch to have a vlan for both

Hi I need some help and am hoping you may be able to help me I have tried to install the latest 2.2.4 of samba with winbind and I am not geting anywere. This is what I have done I have installed Red Hat 7.2 cleanly on a system I have used RPM to remove all versions of samba that is installed Downloaded samba 2.2.4 extracted it then ran sh makerpms.sh created the smb.conf file with the following

Hi List, I'm trying to configure two switches to provide redundancy (i.e. in case one switch goes down), and am wondering if there is a standard way to configure a CentOS box to use different gateways in a bonded interface, depending upon which physical nic is being used? A bit more detail might help answer the "And why do you want to do that?" questions... - Switch 1,

Hello all, I have browsed archives and real all available HOWTOs, but I still have a few doubts. My set up is a router, as below. LAN(100MB)-------------(eth1)Linux-Router(eth0)---------------WAN(2MB/512) My aim is to cotrol both uplink and downlink bandwidth. For uplink control, I will use HTB on WAN interface. For downlink, I plan to attach HTB on LAN interface(both egress/outgoing). No

I have been testing wondershaper 1.1a with htb. DOWNLINK=2304 UPLINK=1024 DEV=wlan0 No other changes have been made, except to comment out the 2 lines to allow the script to run. When I do a speed test from sites like www.toast.net/performance, I only get speeds equal to my UPLINK speed. I expected a speed closer to the DOWNLINK. Am I missing something here? TIA, -- -Wes Hegge Technical

Hello all, Just wondering if it can be done? 2 site, 2 linux boxes (1 at each side), each site has 2 internet connections. Can you create a VPN over those connections to utilize both? It would seem like it would need 2 vpn''s (1 for each pair). Any info is appreciated. Sam