similar to: http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.cookbook.mtu-mss.html

Am 23.06.2020 08:43, schrieb Luca Bertoncello: And another thing, I discovered right now... > Could you suggest me something to restrict the problem? > Currently, I think the problem can be: > > 1) on Asterisk > 2) on my Gateway/Firewall A couple of years ago I added this entry in my firewall: /sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST SYN -j TCPMSS

I sent the message below to this list over a week ago, and I haven''t seen any response. If this is not the correct forum for my question, can anyone suggest a better person or place to which I should direct it? Thank you, Jonathan Kamens ------- Start of forwarded message ------- From: Jonathan Kamens <jik@kamens.brookline.ma.us> To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Subject: [LARTC] MSS

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1058 Bug ID: 1058 Summary: Add clamp MSS to MTU Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org Reporter:

Hello Le 23/06/2020 à 09:06, Luca Bertoncello a écrit : > Am 23.06.2020 08:43, schrieb Luca Bertoncello: > > And another thing, I discovered right now... > >> Could you suggest me something to restrict the problem? >> Currently, I think the problem can be: >> >> 1) on Asterisk >> 2) on my Gateway/Firewall > > A couple of years ago I added this entry

Hello, if you need clampmss then it is highly probable there is a PMTU discovery problem. The clampmss does not work for UDP. I probably counted the size incorrectly. So you are able to ping with size 1464 and not with 1466. How about trying same ping sizes from the internet towards your site? I mean trying to ping from sites with higher MTU than yours without lower MTU links in the path. You

Dear all, I found this command in the HOWTO: iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST SYN -j TCPMSS --set-mss 128 It resolve (almost) all my problems with the voip traffic on my linux-based router. The question is: What does it make exactly? It is safe to use it? Thanks for your attention, Luca Andreani _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list /

I have an internet router powered by gentoo+shorewall2.0.7+adsl(pppoe) but my clients(and gateway) cant access some websites----these sites must be okay,other sites are okay. The I believe it is caused by MTU or MSS, but I have no idea yet. Btw, the unaccessable sites are dynamic, it says: today I cant access www.oracle.com nextday I redail--to get another ip,I can access www.oracle.com. Help!

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=917 Summary: Kernel OOPS on Kernel 3.14.2 Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: NAT AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

Hello every one, first time poster, four month shorewaller ;) As the subject states, I''ve been experienced the infamous trouble described in the next excerpt from shorewall.conf # MSS CLAMPING # # Set this variable to "Yes" or "yes" if you want the TCP "Clamp MSS to PMTU" # option. This option is most commonly required when your internet # interface is some

What for OS is the server and windows clients? The VPN tunnel, are you lowering MTU sizes? Something like: -A FORWARD -m policy --pol ipsec --dir in -s 192.168.0.0/24 -o eth1 -p tcp -m tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST SYN -m tcpmss --mss 1361:1536 -j TCPMSS --set-mss 1360 On the client PC's, have you checkout the windows firewall and are you allowing the remote subnets. The samba server on the

As counter example. My slowest server, AMD E350 2 core, max 1.6Gz. On 1Gb lan, disk 2x 5400rpm software raid 1 + 1 ssd. Copy Speed 115Mb/s as in max 1Gb bandwith, from a win7 and win10 pc to the raid1. File sizes. 100Mb+ get max 115Mb/s to a 4MB blocksized partition. 1-10mb files ,max 90-115Mb/s to a 1MB blocksized partition. 0.0-1mb files ,max 60-100Mb/s to a 4k blocksized partition.

Ps. Smb1 in Win10 ! I mean ofcourse.. Step 1: Go to Start button and type Control Panel. You will get Control Panel; Desktop app. Click on it. Step 2: You will get a window with a list of software on it, go to the left side of the panel and click Turn Windows Features On or Off. Step 3: You need to remove the checkmark beside SMB 1.0/CFs File Sharing Support to disable SMB1 for good. If you

Hai, > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Stephen Davies via samba > Verzonden: donderdag 25 april 2019 8:34 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] User mapping/login issue > > > > It would appear that there may be more than one issue with my smb.conf. > The scenario is a Centos 7

I am having a problem implementing iptables with Courier's pop3 daemon. If I disable iptables, everything works fine. As soon as I enable it, pop3 will stop working for messages over 32K. Small messages will go through with no problems, but large ones will time out. I get this message from OE: "Your POP3 server has not responded in 60 seconds." And an option to stop or continue

Am 25.04.2018 um 09:56 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > As counter example. > My slowest server, AMD E350 2 core, max 1.6Gz. > On 1Gb lan, disk 2x 5400rpm software raid 1 + 1 ssd. > > Copy Speed 115Mb/s as in max 1Gb bandwith, from a win7 and win10 pc to the raid1. > > File sizes. > 100Mb+ get max 115Mb/s to a 4MB blocksized partition. > 1-10mb files ,max

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=534 Summary: --mss in tcp.man Product: iptables Version: 1.3.5 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P2 Component: iptables AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org ReportedBy:

Hi Here is a short description of my network: ppp0 (adsl) ppp1 (adsl) | | | | --------------------- | Router | | Firewall | | MASQUERAD | | DNAT | | | | eth0 | --------------------- | | | ---------------------- |

Hi, A number of students are unable to connect to our print server from their Windows 10 client laptop without entering a user/pass. More precisely: If you try to connect manually to \\IP it says "Username or password incorrect" and prompts to enter a username/password. Despite the server setting to map all users to guest (see further down). I did a packet dump and the client pc

Ah, you gave the solution yourselve.. > client on "different" subnet: > > Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : pitter35 > Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : <<< your missing .. > DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : ier.ux.uis.no > client on same subnet as DC: > > Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : geoah > Primary Dns Suffix . .

Hello, This is a hard one, I've been trying to figure out something since 2 days... When opening a document which has a link to another document, I see traffic from the Windows NT client station going to the Samba server on port 135/UDP. According to Microsoft's web site, port 135 TCP or UDP is "Location Server"... but the Samba server doesn't listen for traffic on port