similar to: attr_accessor_with_default funny

>> You probably want replaceAllUsesWith. > > I am sorry I don't understand. Are you suggesting calling replaceAllUses of > the .str1? What I really want to do is to 'erase' the function. By erasing > I'd expect the uses of .str1 to 0 (because in the example I have it is used > only by f()) and I see they are not. To remove something, the normal idiom is

On 10/24/13 2:13 AM, Rafael Espíndola wrote: > On 23 October 2013 22:41, Vassil Vassilev <vvasilev at cern.ch> wrote: >> Hi, >> I have: >> ... >> @.str1 = private unnamed_addr constant [21 x i8] c"Now f is a >> function\0A\00", align 1 >> ; Function Attrs: ssp uwtable >> define i32 @_Z1fv() #2 { >> entry: >> %call =

I''ve written a JavaScript library called Ortho (http://www.craic.com/ ortho) on top of Prototype for creating ''diagram-style'' graphics in JavaScript. You can create histograms, graphs, timeline plots, ''maps'' of genomic data, annotated images, tree diagrams, etc. Unlike Canvas, it seamlessly integrates text with graphics and the output looks the same

>> reload! Reloading... => true >> puts Class < Module true => nil >> puts Module < Class false => nil >> puts Module < Object true => nil >> puts Object < Module false => nil >> Object.parent => Object The above indicates that the Class object instance inherits from the Module object instance and the Module object instance

All Channel Auto Update Cards ( No Inputting of monthly codes) £25 Modified Originl Cards (The Full Monty) £40 Both are ECM Proof :-) and Include the New ITV Sport Channels

Hi RSpec Mailing list, I''m new to RSpec and I am trying to get it running with the caboo.se sample rails app. I installed the current version of rspec with rspec_on_rails I tried to run rake spec but received: 330-07:~/desktop/restful_auth_rspec/vendor multimedia$ rake spec (in /Users/multimedia/Desktop/restful_auth_rspec)

def file_tail (file, offset) 56 f=File.new(file) f.seek(-offset,IO::SEEK_END) f.read end def get_tags file file_tail(file, 128) end using these def to get ID3 data works well till it encounters this Äîðîãàÿïðîïàæà.mp3 56 :in ''initialize'' : Invalid argument - c://///Äîðîãàÿïðîïàæà.mp3 (Errno::EINVAL) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~

HTML attachment scrubbed and removed -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: audio/x-wav Size: 0 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/attachments/20020506/98ba3087/attachment.wav -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type:

Hello I am trying to install the following package . I am logged in as SU of course. Below is my input and output. Any ideas? install.packages("kernlab") --- Please select a CRAN mirror for use in this session --- Loading Tcl/Tk interface ... done Error in m[, 1] : incorrect number of dimensions Best, Alon [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

So I have this structure. class Gallery < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :owner, :polymorphic => true has_many :folders, :order => ''slug'', :dependent => :destroy class Folder < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :photos, :dependent => :destroy, :conditions => "parent_id IS NULL" belongs_to :gallery class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_one

Hi, got a very funny problem with one tinc connection: I have a network with 4 different nodes - all run the same tinc version and configuration. We have 192.168.0. - 192.168.3. as networks. At three nodes, everything runs like a charm (windows, tcp, etc) At the fourth node (192.168.3.1), the following happens: I can -ping any other IP address in the super-net, -ssh any other host -telnet any

Hi All, I am new to the group so to start with hi! Here is my question. We are running samba on a sun 6800, pretty standard install, we only have 3 "service" accounts using samba. We have the following problem, if a process copies a file to a samba share from a non clustered SQL server, everything is fine, username and group are owners of the file it creates. Now the same

[I send this to R-help, since the bug may affect users..] The beta(.) and ln(beta(..)) functions are not giving proper results in R-0.49. This does NOT affect usual beta-distribution calculations, since the internal beta(.) and lbeta(.) are okay. beta(1,2) [1] -0.6931472 exp(beta(1,2)) [1] 0.5 lbeta(3,4) [1] 3 ------- For R-devel'ers : Using gdb clearly shows that beta(.) really

Hi All, During the last couple of days I have noticed that my “reviews” page in phabricator show inconsistent content. Is there perhaps a caching problem, or did database get stuck in an inconsistent state? This is very frustrating for those relying on phabricator as a task organizer. E.g. for me the revision D42404 is not in “Waiting on review” list, but it is in the state “needs review”. In

Hello Christoph, I was looking at bug 64323[1] over the weekend as to why this case works under nvc0+ hardware and does not under nv50. Here are some of the things I've noticed: * nvc0 uses immediate(s) for VERTEX_BEGIN_GL/VERTEX_END_GL * nvc0 is more consistent for doing pushbuffer space checks * nvc0 uses dirty tracking in set_index_buffer() * nvc0 uses "VERTEX_DATA push mode"

I'm going to file this bug but it's kind of a blocker for me so maybe someone has time to look at it. Should be nearly trivial to fix. It's a bug in the way the "section" attribute of functions is processed. Consider the following code: void x(int i) __attribute((section(".mySection,\"aw\", at progbits#"))); void x(int i) { } If you compile this

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 06:57:29PM -0700, reed kotler wrote: > I'm going to file this bug but it's kind of a blocker for me so > maybe someone has time > to look at it. Should be nearly trivial to fix. I don't think this is a bug, but a misfeature in GCC due to the way it does (non-)escaping. Joerg

On 04/19/2013 12:43 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 09:47:28AM -0700, reed kotler wrote: >> The clean solution is probably to add two additional function >> attributes to cover these additional pieces, namely "ax" and >> @progbits. > > Extend the section attribute to allow additional parameters? > > Joerg > The idea would be to

> The idea would be to create additional function attributes. > I have not spent time thinking this through yet. > > section_flags("flags") > section_type("type") > others.... What would the semantic be of having section_flags but no section name? > so then > > void x(int i) __attributes__((section("mysection"),

> I have not looked at how gcc implements this internally but in LLVM I'm > creating real IR for a function (the stub being in mips32 mode; even though > the rest of the compilation unit is being compiled in mips16 mode). This is > one (not the only) reason why I implemented the ability to switch processor > modes on a per function basis. Now that I see where this is from, why