similar to: Re: LARTC digest, Vol 1 #1385 - 4 msgs

Здравствуйте lartc-request, Friday, October 03, 2003, 8:44:37 AM, you wrote: lrmdn> Send LARTC mailing list submissions to lrmdn> lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl lrmdn> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit lrmdn> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc lrmdn> or, via email, send a message with subject or body ''help'' to lrmdn>

There's a groklaw article summarizing recent discussion about the impact of the Bilski case on software patents: http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20081102011538422 "The judge says this kind of cloning could be done without infringing Microsoft's copyrights, but how about its patents? Prior to Bilski, one might give one answer. Now, one might give another." If we

I agree, but this is still better than crashing the machine... Aron -----Original Message----- From: Michael Renzmann [mailto:mrenzmann@otaku42.de] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 1:33 PM To: Aron Brand Cc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl; roy@xxx.lt Subject: Re: [LARTC] RE: LARTC digest, Vol 1 #1558 - 9 msgs Hi. Aron Brand wrote: > does this. Another option would be to trick the kernel that the

Andrew: Differentiated Service on Linux HOWTO (work in progress) could be of some help for you. Have a look at http://opalsoft.net/qos Best regards, Leonardo Balliache >Message: 6 >From: "Burnside, Andrew" <Andrew.Burnside@thalesgroup.com> >To: "''lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl''" <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl> >Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 13:24:44

Message: 12 From: Gery Kahn <geryk@sphera.com> To: "''lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl''" <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 20:28:30 +0200 Subject: [LARTC] priority of class ->split traffic in 2 more classes ->tc class add dev eth0 parent 2:0 classid 2:21 cbq avpkt 1000 bandwidth ->100Mbit \ ->rate 70Mbit prio 3 maxburst 20 ->tc qdisc add

Hi Roy, Strange. "kernel will resend then together with new ones" - this is interesting, since the firewall DOES know how to drop locally generated packets and the kernel doesn''t attempt to retry them. I am not an expert on this, but I think it might be interesting to check how the firewall does this. Another option would be to trick the kernel that the packet has been

Hi Roy, It seems that I wasn''t clear. Lets give an example. I have a machine with a single ethernet interface, with two IP addresses A and B. This is done using two virtual interfaces. A is my IP address in ISP-A. B is my IP address in ISP-B. The physical line to ISP-A is 1.5Mbps. The physical line to ISP-B is 256kbps. I want to shape the traffic so that, for example, HTTP traffic

Martin, If I understand whay you are suggesting, there is a problem in your design: It will only work if you use Hide NAT. The problem is that the ip_src == IP0 rule is wrong: The ip_src is not changed by the router and it is not equal to the IP of any of the machine interfaces. Can you think of a solution that will work in the following reasonabl scenario: Lets say I have two T1 internet

> Message: 9 > To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl > Subject: Re: [LARTC] Traffic Balance > Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 20:26:55 -0300 (EST) > From: favero@grad.ufsc.br > > list members: if u don´t wanna help, dont disturb! damn god! > everybody here know that LARTC tutorial to load balance is > incomplete! > Alexis: try http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt and search the list. > U

Hi I''m looking for a quick recipe for a newbie to control http traffic in my linux gw. My internet is overloaded already and vpn external clients are experiencing troubles (disconnecting in peak hours). Any suggestions ? Regards Guillermo Caracas/Venezuela On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 14:40, lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl wrote: > Send LARTC mailing list submissions to >

Hi! >Message: 5 >Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 17:00:21 +0530 >From: Sudheer Divakaran <sudheer@svw.com> >To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl >Subject: [LARTC] Is Linux based Router feasible > >Hi, > >I''ve a local LAN consisting of about 150 machines. I''m using a Linux >machine as the gateway machine which inturn connects to two different >ISPs. My

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1385 Summary: extra backslashes in RB_PROTOTYPE Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.7p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: Miscellaneous AssignedTo: bitbucket at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1385 Bug ID: 1385 Summary: Incorrectly evaluated expression with negated ip saddr and negated ip daddr Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1385 Moderate Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1385.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 9bc8d8f3b13bd1e86556aac113b79d1c kdelibs-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.1.i386.rpm e18dd5ee93157926b434456fafea2569 kdelibs-apidocs-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.1.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1385 Moderate Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1385.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 9bc8d8f3b13bd1e86556aac113b79d1c kdelibs-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.1.i386.rpm 02723b60e5c81720d8ff3b513e9b9d98 kdelibs-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.1.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1385 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1385.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: cbbbb797a07dc177e93089d228bd982a kdelibs-3.3.1-18.el4.i386.rpm 64ca658c4525d7124327e407560fd9d8 kdelibs-devel-3.3.1-18.el4.i386.rpm Source:

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1385 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1385.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: cbbbb797a07dc177e93089d228bd982a kdelibs-3.3.1-18.el4.i386.rpm ce19cf21038351f0e487ef0220d22121 kdelibs-3.3.1-18.el4.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:1385 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1385.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 79f110ffe20135bca3e1c9df3ac6fd8697018b9886d2b071cfef8415f87197a9 java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.28.1.10.10.el5_8.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2018:1385 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:1385 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 55e5c700737c98f41786bdb049a40fa7cac289f769054fa576b7eef57e20342a libguestfs-1.36.10-6.el7_5.2.x86_64.rpm

Hello, It would appear there is a problem with Rsync. I get the following error when trying to rsync with my website: Some files could not be transferred, rsync error 23 at main.c:1385. It would seem this is not an isolated problem: http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=rsync+error+code+23+at+%22main.c%3A13 85%22&meta=lr%3Dlang_da%7Clang_nl%7Clang_en%7Clang_fi%7Clang_fr%7Clang_de%7C