similar to: Need to modify WonderShaper 1.1

I have a firewall with 3 interfaces DMZ, INTERNET, LAN. Does anyone have an example script to do QOS on multiple intefaces using htb? Gareth Segree mailto:Gareth.Segree@gleanerjm.com <mailto:Gareth.Segree@gleanerjm.com> Technical Support Analyst The Gleaner Company Ltd. 7 North Street Kingston Tel: 922-3400

I have 2 connections to the internet. 1 is an ADSL the other is a 3MB link over satellite. This is a portion of my firewall script ip route flush table 3 2> /dev/null ip rule delete table 3 2> /dev/null ip route add table 3 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link ip route add table 3 89.0.0.0/8 dev eth0 scope link ip rule add fwmark 3 table 3 ip route add table 3 default via $isp2_ip dev eth3 ip

I''ve gotten wondershaper to work in my linux box, which is part of a 3 computer network that shares the same dsl connection. The linuxbox handles most bulk down and uploading, and the other 2 are mainly for surfing and such. What I need from wiondershaper is that it should perform it''s tasks with all of the traffic to the dsl modem, but do nothing with the internal traffic

Hi Guys, I''m asking this question again because I have exhausted resources for understanding how to get it to work. I''ve read the howto on getting traffic shaping to work (shorewall''s web site) as well as trying out wondershaper''s htb and cbq scripts. Somehow both does not seem to happen as I want it to. I''ve also read through the lartc

I''m currently building a firewall for a network with 2 ISP links. Unfortunately, one of the ISP''s doesn''t support BGP yet, otherwise I would be doing load balancing at the router, instead of the firewall. I''ve been trying to find information on how to get WonderShaper working, but everything I''ve found talks about setting it up for a firewall with one

Hi, I have tried unsuccesfully to limit my ftp server send speed in linux. I have an ipcop linux firewall/router with 2 nics. 1 nic (eth1) is connected to a 3mbit/384Kbit cable connection and the other (eth0) a switch. Behind it i have a suse linux box and a windows box. On the suse box i run proftpd. I need to shape my passive ftp send speed to 34KBytes because if it is maxed out at 45K

I have wondershaper to limit my upload at 400kilobits (my line is 600kbps). I do a lot of torrent seeding and I dont want my pings killed when I''m uploading so I set low prority source ports as follows (by the way, I have bittornet to only use ports 6881-6910): NOPRIOPORTSRC="6881 6882 6883 6884 6885 6886 6887 6888 6889 6890 6891 6892 6893 6894 6895 6896 6897 6898 6899 6900 6901

Hello, I''ve been trying to shape the bittorrent traffic (on my external interface, upload), but without luck, for this I''m using layer7 filter right now, but I''ve also tried ipp2p, with the same results, I might say that this is not a problem with this packet classifiers, the problem is with HTB, here''s why. When I open azureus (the bittorrent client I

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, been awhile since I''ve written. I now have a situation where I get to use traffic shaping for a client. ~ We implemented the WonderShaper script on our own firewall and experienced no problems. I made some modifications to it to add IPSec protocol packets into the 1:10 high priority class using the u32 filter. ~ So far on our

I''m having a network inside of a dsl modem and I''m using wondershaper on the computers to be able to surf while bulk downloading. The problem is that also the internal traffic is shaped, which means the internal network is at 200kb/s, instead of 100Mb/s. Is there a way to exclude the internal adresses from the wondershaper rules, or is there any other good way to solve this?

greetings all, i''ve searched high and low for this, but can''t seem to find an answer anywhere.. having read the docs and the wondershaper script itself, it occurred to me that the documentation promises an immediate drop in interactive app latency, specifically mentioning SSH as a big winner. however, looking through the script i can''t really tell just *how*

Hi everybody! I know this discussion list isn´t just about wondershaper, but i think someone can help me. I used to have a linux box running red hat 8, as firewall on my lan. I upgraded to debian 3.0 and tried to use the same wondershaper files under debian, but, when i run wondershaper on ppp0 device, it just stops transfering. Remember: its the same files i used with success under red hat 8.

Hello Thilo, What did you find superior with CBQ-wondershaper over HTB-wondershaper? We have not been using wondershaper specifically but our simple tests so far seem to show that htb is much easier to configure for a given target shape (i.,e accurate) compared to CBQ. Torsten -----Original Message----- From: Thilo Schulz [mailto:arny@ats.s.bawue.de] Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 8:55 AM To:

Hi all, ive got wondershaper working well with the highest download while maintaing minimal latency but the problem is this: ive got 2 nics in the linux router eth0 and eth1. eth1= internet interface but this is connected to a router say 10.0.0.190, now off that router there are other servers, mail server, domino server etc now if i shape on eth1 ingress and egress using the wondershaper script

Season Greetings to all Tom, in your faq, u have this noted: While I am currently using the HTB version of The Wonder Shaper (I just copied wshaper.htb to /etc/shorewall/tcstart and modified it as shown in the Wondershaper README), I treid this with wondershaper, using Bearing Leaf 1.0 stable i even changed the tc command to run_tc, and tried it in both angles, and i receive the following..

Hello, I am trying wondershaper-1.1a on a friend''s pppoe connection on her Linux box. There are a few things I don''t understand. 1. She has pppoe connection so should DEV=eth0 or DEV=ppp0 ? 2. Her ISP just says on her payment bill that the speed is 128kbps, but doesn''t mention any downlink/uplink speed, so in that case what should be, DOWNLINK= and UPLINK= ? 3. She

Is there a way to apply wondershaper w/ htb to a port range? I have a ftp server on port 65432 and passive ports 50000-60000. Is there a way to set a range? or do they have to be individually listed? The following doesnt seem to work: # low priority source ports NOPRIOPORTSRC=65432, 50000:60000 # low priority destination ports NOPRIOPORTDST= Mark

Hi, I have a question conercing wondershaper. I''m using the Clarkconnect linux distribution for my linux router and I tried to use wondershaper. On start up of wshaper, there are no errors or any other problems but I''m not sure if it''s running correctly. Only one qdisc / one class is used and when I start an uplink ftp transfer, my ping time is growing up to 1700ms - I

Hi ! I´ve been using the wonderful wondershaper from chapter 15.8 of the LARTC Howto for some time. It´s really wonderful. Actually, I use the version from http://freshmeat.net/projects/wshaper/?topic_id=87 Now I tried to put some hosts to low priority, and it doesn´t work. The traffic is splitted equally between the noprio and the other hosts. Is this because I use ip masquerading, and all

Hi, first of all, let me thank you for your great Shoreline Firewall. I use it with great success at home (protecting my WiFi connection). And now if I could have a question about traffic shaping. I did read everything I could find but I still have two problems: first, the MARK from tcrules is not working in HTB based simple tc filter line ("handle $MARK fw classid 1:20"). If I switch