similar to: Dynamic finders in has_many associations

Dear all, I wrote a simple script in order to put together some functions and method to be executed on various files I am trying to have to possibility to call the script changing few parameters in order to use the different files. I succeeded partly using the function method. However in my script I call the sink() function in order to output the results to a .txt file. When using the function the

Hi, I understand there are total 11 types of key Options for finding a record. The all 11 valid keys for the options hash are :conditions, :include, :order, :select, :group, :joins, :from, :limit, :offset, :readonly, and :lock. We also have Dynamic Finders for the same. e.g. ... find_by etc... I would like to know, how many types of dynamic finders, Active Record provides, to match all those

I can not seem to make finders work with aliases. My goal is to map some fugly field names to nice field names and have the finders work with the nice field names. An example. class Users < ActiveRecord::Base alias :password :UserPWD end This doesn''t seem to work because obviously the object doesn''t have a method called UserPWD. What is the best way (short of a view) to

Now I have some access problems. This is what ends up un messages Hosts.allow is set to accept anyone on the local net. Username and passwords are the same Upsc gives proper output. System is Centos 6.8 Jul 22 17:20:06 BIFROST upscode2[10113]: Startup successful Jul 22 17:20:06 BIFROST upsd[10116]: listening on ::1 port 3493 Jul 22 17:20:06 BIFROST upsd[10116]: listening on 192.168.0.1 port 3493

I have some finders in my models where I write some of the sql myself. I of course want to test these, but am not sure the best way. Should I just let them roll through to the db, and verify they return the correct objects based on the fixtures I load, or should I spec the actual query? I know that DB access is sort of frowned upon, but is this a situation where it is more or less acceptable? My

Is there any sort of dynamic finder for polymorphic associations? For example if I had: class InviteNode < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :inviteable, :polymorphic => true end I would like to be able to search by: InviteNode.find_by_inviteable(some_object) instead of having to do: InviteNode.find_by_inviteable_id_and_inviteable_type(some_object.id, some_object.class.name) obviously I

Hi all, I am not certain this is a 1.8.4 related issue, but I think it might be. I''m trying to use dynamic finders for my Category and Post models, such that a request /blog/categories/general would detect the slug and do a find_by_slug() instead of find(params[:id]). My have_slug?() method works fine, and the dynamic finders *were* working fine until I moved it off my local machine

I''m looking through the api for something like find(:all, :distinct => true) so that multiple instances of a row won''t be returned - is this possible? Thanks!

Hello everyone, I have another question related to a legacy schema I am working with. Do dynamic finders work with legacy schemas in general? The schema I am working with uses hungarian prefixes for column names. For example fOpen is 0 if a bug is closed and 1 if it is open (type smallint). When I try @bugs = Bug.find_all_by_fOpen(1), I get the following exception: undefined method

We have a Page model which acts_as_paranoid. AAP modifies ActiveRecord finders to ignore any records marked as deleted unless the :with_deleted => true option is supplied. We have a UI element which allows users to toggle whether or not to display deleted Pages, their current setting being stored in a session variable, session[:show_deleted]. What we would like is to automagically have

Hi all, I am having a problem with unit tests. Whenever I have a dependency between two models (B depends on A) deleting A should also delete B. This is simple with the dependent parameter in the model file of A. But when I write a test the dependency seems to work, I can''t find the answer with id 1 anymore(Answer.find(1)). But I appearently _do_ find it with

What could cause this? >> sdfl=PartNumber.find_by_part_number("1111111") => #<PartNumber:0xb78fc744 @attributes={"id"=>"11601", "part_number"=>"1111111"}> >> sdfl=PartNumber.find_or_create_by_part_number("1111111") NoMethodError: undefined method `find_or_create_by_part_number'' for PartNumber:Class

Hi all, I had troubles while running tests on Active Record: bundle exec rake test_sqlite3 /Users/oscardelben/code/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/core_ext/hash/keys.rb:70:in `block in assert_valid_keys'': Unknown key: extend (ArgumentError) This is because some models used by tests are using the extend option which now seems deprecated. Should related tests be

Bonjour, c''est ma premi?re question ici car d''habitude il me suffit de parcourir de tels forum pour trouver r?ponse ? mes questions. Donc cette fois, c''est du s?rieux, je n''ai pas r?ussi ? trouver la moindre ?vocation ? mon probl?me. Je vous explique. J''ai une famille de mod?les : class Attachement < ActiveRecord::Base ... end class Illustration

Hi All! It''s been a while since I had to ask for help, but I''m back! I''ve finished beta testing my big app and started the transition to production. Everything went fine and the production version was working till I was asked to add another model :-( (Almost a year of beta testing and they only come up with it after moving to production :-D ) I successfully

On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 7:48 AM, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: > > I also have not used a Synology device, but as I recall, they generally > expect to be the NUT master system. This may cause problems if you need to > do something fancy with upssched. > The Synology boxes work fine as NUT clients, *however* they provide very little ability to configure NUT

Hello everyone, I have another question related to a legacy schema I am working with. Do dynamic finders work with legacy schemas in general? The schema I am working with uses hungarian prefixes for column names. For example fOpen is 0 if a bug is closed and 1 if it is open (type smallint). When I try @bugs = Bug.find_all_by_fOpen(1), I get the following exception: undefined method

Given this code (which renders rjs), I''m faced with the fixture- driven way of spec-ing or mocking. How the heck to you mock this so the code at line (2) and (4) work right? I''m still struggling with mocks but it seems like this can be done. Forgive the naivety of this question. 1. def change_quantity 2. @line_item = LineItem.find_by_id(params[:id]) 3. unless

Hello, since applying the patches related to XSA-36 Xen recognizes a broken IVRS ACPI table and disables I/O virtualisation. I contacted the manufacturer of the mainboard/BIOS and they want to help me by providing a patched BIOS - so far so good. However, they need details about what to fix, which I don''t know either. Could you pls. give me some hints which I can forward to the

From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com> This patch handle additional cases for IVRS bugs where special->handle is not correctly initialized for IOAPIC and HPETS due to firmware bugs. Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com> Provide logic in "is_ioapic_overidden()" Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> ---