Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "named_scope and ordering"
2009 Jul 23
11
Problem with named_scope
Here are my scopes:
default_scope :order => ''posted_on DESC'', :conditions => { :status =>
''visible'' }
named_scope :positive, :conditions => { :rating => ''positive'', :status
=> ''visible'' }
named_scope :neutral, :conditions => { :rating => ''neutral'', :status
=>
2008 Jun 12
0
named_scope doesn''t check for critical method names.
I just entered this ticket.
http://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994-ruby-on-rails/tickets/404-named_scope-bashes-critical-methods
It turns out that in an ActiveRecord model like this
Model << ActiveRecord::Base
named_scope :public
private
def private_method
end
public
def public_method
end
end
The method public_method will be private because named scope
2010 Nov 03
0
Accessing (updating?) the proxy_scope chain for named_scope (Rails 2.3.x)
I have many named_scopes chained together in the normal way. So far
so good. However in a couple of cases where:
1. The named scope is actually a correlated subquery and I need to
pass additional scope into it sometimes.
2. Where the presence of a named scope in the chain should change the
behaviour of a named_scope later in the chain
Given: Product.price.volume.average_discount
2008 Jun 12
0
Mysterious interaction between RSpec 1.1.4 and has_finder/named_scope
I just opened a Rails ticket on a problem with named_scope in Rails 2.1, and
cross-posted a message here which I send to rails-core.
I''m still a bit mystified, because I''m having a problem caused by this on
RSpec 1.1.4, but not on 1.1.3, and I don''t see a difference in code which
would explain it.
The basic problem, which I encountered upgrading our rails app to RSpec
2010 Sep 01
4
deprecation warning in Rails 3 about Base.named_scope
I recently upgraded to Rails 3, and this error has come up
ubiquitously:
DEPRECATION WARNING: Base.named_scope has been deprecated, please use
Base.scope instead.
Any ideas on how to get rid of it? Or should I just wait for
something?
There''s actually no place in my application where the code
"Base.named_scope" exists, so I assume the problem is inherent in gems
that
2009 Jul 11
2
offeride :limit named_scope default_scope
Hi,
Rails 2.3.2
class TestD < ActiveRecord::Base
default_scope :limit => 12
named_scope :limit, lambda { |num| { :limit => num} }
end
ruby script/console
>> TestD.all
TestD Load (0.7ms) SELECT * FROM "test_ds" LIMIT 12
=> []
>> TestD.limit(14)
TestD Load (0.3ms) SELECT * FROM "test_ds" LIMIT 12
=> []
Any ideas why the default limit
2008 Jul 20
0
eager loading a named_scope
Hi,
I''d like to eager load a named_scope like this:
User.find(params[:id], :include => [:friends.married])
Any ideas?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To
2010 Jan 05
2
Conditional named_scope chaining with params (Need help)
Hello there,
I have a model that has more then one named_scope.
In my action Index of the controller that handle this model I want to do
this in a drier way:
if params[:ownership] == "mine"
@posts = Post.tagged_with(params[:tags], :on =>
:tags).owner(current_user.id).paginate :all, :page => params[:page],
:order => ''created_at DESC''
else
2008 May 13
6
Testing that named_scope is defined
Hi guys,
I''m just beginning to use RSpec and I ran into the issue of testing a
named_scope. I''m not actually trying to test its behavior, as it''s not
my code, but I wanted to test at least that it''s defined. I tried
doing this:
describe Post, ".most_recent" do
it "should be defined" do
Post.method_defined?(:most_recent).should be_true
2010 Feb 11
3
Parameterized ActiveRecord Associations: Any such thing?
Hi list, how are ya?
So, my current project is just begging for the ability to have
parameterized associations in my ActiveRecord classes. Basically I
need something that is a cross between named scopes and standard
associations (has_many specifically).
I''m wondering if such a thing exists or, if not, if anyone else has an
elegant, equivalent solution?
Example:
class Sprocket <
2010 Jul 07
1
Ticket 5063: Typo in named_scope in activerecord tests category.rb
Hey all,
Does someone want to look over a super-trivial patch I just
submitted? It''s just correcting a typo; someone accidentally spelled
"group_by_title" as "gruop_by_title" in the category.rb model in the
activerecord tests. I just fixed it in the model, and in the two
places it''s referenced in the habtm test.
Thanks,
Ben
--
You received this message
2010 Mar 09
1
Ruby 1.9 and Searchlogic problem
Hello,
After updating our Rails app to ruby 1.9 there are some problems with
searchlogic, here you can find the error :
Error : wrong number of arguments (1 for 0)
Full trace ( passenger ) :
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/named_scope.rb:92:in
`call''
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/named_scope.rb:92:in
2010 Jan 15
1
Chaining queries in ActiveRecord
Hi all,
Stuck at this problem for several days. Tried to use named_scope,
scope_out, and plugin such as searchlogic, but no result.
The problem is as follows: I have a pic table and tag table, and a
join table called pic_tag (with only pic_id and tag_id) so that I can
associate N pics to M tags. This is the tutorial way to set up a many-
to-many association. I''m trying to implement a
2010 Dec 31
1
WickedPDF - wrong number of arguments
I''m trying to get this plugin to work for me. I''m having the
following issue when I try to render a pdf (/fancy_things/45.pdf )..
Any suggestions?
Thanks!
ERROR:
Started GET "/fancy_things/45.pdf" for 192.168.66.1 at Fri Dec 31
10:59:07 -0500 2010
Processing by OrdersController#show as PDF
Parameters: {"id"=>"45"}
2010 Sep 23
6
Named scope in named scope ??
Hi,
I would like to return a combination of named scopes in a named
scope :
For example, I have a named scope filter and I want to add a named
scope eval_filters like
Product.eval_filters([''x'',''y'',''z'']) is equivalent to
Product.filter(''x'').filter(''y'').filter(''z'')
Anybody know how can I
2014 Mar 01
0
Rails controller problems
1. Users_Controller CRUD expects param[:id] to create User instance. With
Orders_Controller, I'd like to retrieve a list of users who have ordered. I
know Orders_Controller expects param[:id] to be for creating Order
instance. So does this mean if I want to retrieve a list of users who have
ordered, I should create a method called 'get_orders' in Users_Controller?
2. Can
2010 Jun 24
3
DRY a named scope
Is there a way to DRY this up a bit?
named_scope :has_valid_sysoid, lambda{|sysoid|
(sysoid.nil?) ? {:conditions => ["nodesysoid IS NOT NULL AND
nodelabel LIKE ''%-to-%''"], :include => [:ipinterface, :alarm]} :
{:conditions => ["nodesysoid IS NOT NULL AND nodelabel LIKE ''%-to-%''
AND nodesysoid = ? ", sysoid], :include =>
2008 Jun 03
1
Custom counter cache
class Category
has_many :tracks
end
class Track
belongs_to :category, :counter_cache => true
named_scope :converted, :conditions => {:converted => true}
named_scope :active, :conditions => {:active => true}
end
I want to make custom counters for scoped associations, e.g:
category.converted_tracks_count
category.active_tracks_count
And when `track` changes its converted,
2008 Jun 05
3
how to specify controller '/admin/foo'
WeBrick handles the link correctly on development, but apache in
production does not:
<%= link_to "Orders", :controller => ''/admin/orders'', :action => ''index'' %>
The controller lives in ./app/controllers/admin/orders_controller.rb
From the production log, apache is looking for the "orders" action in
2006 Jan 06
6
HABTM problem not saving all associations
Hello all,
I have an Order object that has and belongs to many Products and has
and belongs to many Loan Types. This is so I can select multiples of
each in my order entry screen via checkbox groups.
I''m having some trouble with saving multiple HABTM associations for a
single model object; only the first HABTM association declared in the
model will save during the initial @order.save