similar to: named_scope and ordering

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "named_scope and ordering"

2009 Jul 23
11
Problem with named_scope
Here are my scopes: default_scope :order => ''posted_on DESC'', :conditions => { :status => ''visible'' } named_scope :positive, :conditions => { :rating => ''positive'', :status => ''visible'' } named_scope :neutral, :conditions => { :rating => ''neutral'', :status =>
2008 Jun 12
0
named_scope doesn''t check for critical method names.
I just entered this ticket. http://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994-ruby-on-rails/tickets/404-named_scope-bashes-critical-methods It turns out that in an ActiveRecord model like this Model << ActiveRecord::Base named_scope :public private def private_method end public def public_method end end The method public_method will be private because named scope
2010 Nov 03
0
Accessing (updating?) the proxy_scope chain for named_scope (Rails 2.3.x)
I have many named_scopes chained together in the normal way. So far so good. However in a couple of cases where: 1. The named scope is actually a correlated subquery and I need to pass additional scope into it sometimes. 2. Where the presence of a named scope in the chain should change the behaviour of a named_scope later in the chain Given: Product.price.volume.average_discount
2008 Jun 12
0
Mysterious interaction between RSpec 1.1.4 and has_finder/named_scope
I just opened a Rails ticket on a problem with named_scope in Rails 2.1, and cross-posted a message here which I send to rails-core. I''m still a bit mystified, because I''m having a problem caused by this on RSpec 1.1.4, but not on 1.1.3, and I don''t see a difference in code which would explain it. The basic problem, which I encountered upgrading our rails app to RSpec
2010 Sep 01
4
deprecation warning in Rails 3 about Base.named_scope
I recently upgraded to Rails 3, and this error has come up ubiquitously: DEPRECATION WARNING: Base.named_scope has been deprecated, please use Base.scope instead. Any ideas on how to get rid of it? Or should I just wait for something? There''s actually no place in my application where the code "Base.named_scope" exists, so I assume the problem is inherent in gems that
2009 Jul 11
2
offeride :limit named_scope default_scope
Hi, Rails 2.3.2 class TestD < ActiveRecord::Base default_scope :limit => 12 named_scope :limit, lambda { |num| { :limit => num} } end ruby script/console >> TestD.all TestD Load (0.7ms) SELECT * FROM "test_ds" LIMIT 12 => [] >> TestD.limit(14) TestD Load (0.3ms) SELECT * FROM "test_ds" LIMIT 12 => [] Any ideas why the default limit
2008 Jul 20
0
eager loading a named_scope
Hi, I''d like to eager load a named_scope like this: User.find(params[:id], :include => [:friends.married]) Any ideas? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To
2010 Jan 05
2
Conditional named_scope chaining with params (Need help)
Hello there, I have a model that has more then one named_scope. In my action Index of the controller that handle this model I want to do this in a drier way: if params[:ownership] == "mine" @posts = Post.tagged_with(params[:tags], :on => :tags).owner(current_user.id).paginate :all, :page => params[:page], :order => ''created_at DESC'' else
2008 May 13
6
Testing that named_scope is defined
Hi guys, I''m just beginning to use RSpec and I ran into the issue of testing a named_scope. I''m not actually trying to test its behavior, as it''s not my code, but I wanted to test at least that it''s defined. I tried doing this: describe Post, ".most_recent" do it "should be defined" do Post.method_defined?(:most_recent).should be_true
2010 Feb 11
3
Parameterized ActiveRecord Associations: Any such thing?
Hi list, how are ya? So, my current project is just begging for the ability to have parameterized associations in my ActiveRecord classes. Basically I need something that is a cross between named scopes and standard associations (has_many specifically). I''m wondering if such a thing exists or, if not, if anyone else has an elegant, equivalent solution? Example: class Sprocket <
2010 Jul 07
1
Ticket 5063: Typo in named_scope in activerecord tests category.rb
Hey all, Does someone want to look over a super-trivial patch I just submitted? It''s just correcting a typo; someone accidentally spelled "group_by_title" as "gruop_by_title" in the category.rb model in the activerecord tests. I just fixed it in the model, and in the two places it''s referenced in the habtm test. Thanks, Ben -- You received this message
2010 Mar 09
1
Ruby 1.9 and Searchlogic problem
Hello, After updating our Rails app to ruby 1.9 there are some problems with searchlogic, here you can find the error : Error : wrong number of arguments (1 for 0) Full trace ( passenger ) : /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/named_scope.rb:92:in `call'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/named_scope.rb:92:in
2010 Jan 15
1
Chaining queries in ActiveRecord
Hi all, Stuck at this problem for several days. Tried to use named_scope, scope_out, and plugin such as searchlogic, but no result. The problem is as follows: I have a pic table and tag table, and a join table called pic_tag (with only pic_id and tag_id) so that I can associate N pics to M tags. This is the tutorial way to set up a many- to-many association. I''m trying to implement a
2010 Dec 31
1
WickedPDF - wrong number of arguments
I''m trying to get this plugin to work for me. I''m having the following issue when I try to render a pdf (/fancy_things/45.pdf ).. Any suggestions? Thanks! ERROR: Started GET "/fancy_things/45.pdf" for 192.168.66.1 at Fri Dec 31 10:59:07 -0500 2010 Processing by OrdersController#show as PDF Parameters: {"id"=>"45"}
2010 Sep 23
6
Named scope in named scope ??
Hi, I would like to return a combination of named scopes in a named scope : For example, I have a named scope filter and I want to add a named scope eval_filters like Product.eval_filters([''x'',''y'',''z'']) is equivalent to Product.filter(''x'').filter(''y'').filter(''z'') Anybody know how can I
2014 Mar 01
0
Rails controller problems
1. Users_Controller CRUD expects param[:id] to create User instance. With Orders_Controller, I'd like to retrieve a list of users who have ordered. I know Orders_Controller expects param[:id] to be for creating Order instance. So does this mean if I want to retrieve a list of users who have ordered, I should create a method called 'get_orders' in Users_Controller? 2. Can
2010 Jun 24
3
DRY a named scope
Is there a way to DRY this up a bit? named_scope :has_valid_sysoid, lambda{|sysoid| (sysoid.nil?) ? {:conditions => ["nodesysoid IS NOT NULL AND nodelabel LIKE ''%-to-%''"], :include => [:ipinterface, :alarm]} : {:conditions => ["nodesysoid IS NOT NULL AND nodelabel LIKE ''%-to-%'' AND nodesysoid = ? ", sysoid], :include =>
2008 Jun 03
1
Custom counter cache
class Category has_many :tracks end class Track belongs_to :category, :counter_cache => true named_scope :converted, :conditions => {:converted => true} named_scope :active, :conditions => {:active => true} end I want to make custom counters for scoped associations, e.g: category.converted_tracks_count category.active_tracks_count And when `track` changes its converted,
2008 Jun 05
3
how to specify controller '/admin/foo'
WeBrick handles the link correctly on development, but apache in production does not: <%= link_to "Orders", :controller => ''/admin/orders'', :action => ''index'' %> The controller lives in ./app/controllers/admin/orders_controller.rb From the production log, apache is looking for the "orders" action in
2006 Jan 06
6
HABTM problem not saving all associations
Hello all, I have an Order object that has and belongs to many Products and has and belongs to many Loan Types. This is so I can select multiples of each in my order entry screen via checkbox groups. I''m having some trouble with saving multiple HABTM associations for a single model object; only the first HABTM association declared in the model will save during the initial @order.save