similar to: NoMethodError (...occurred while evaluating nil.split)

I have an index method with a respond_to block that produces this error: NoMethodError (You have a nil object when you didn''t expect it! The error occurred while evaluating nil.accepts): The show method has the same respond_to block but doesn''t error out. If I take the respond_to block out of the index method, it works. If I give index params[:keywords] I get this error:

In R devel rev.66393 (2014-08-15) it was possible to do this: trace(optim, exit = quote(str(returnValue()))) but returnValue() does not seem to be available any more. The above was useful to get the output of a function when it was called deep within another function that I have no control over. Has this been replaced by some other equivalent function? P.S. This demonstrates that it no

The error occurred while evaluating nil.prefetch_primary_key? Hi, I have a problem with a model when I have 3 belongs_to relations in one the middle. This example is a subset of a grid-routing project: n 1 1 n +------------ Project Connection ------- ConnectionCost +------------ WaySearchRun

Hi All, My codegen is trying to generate some thing like this: entry: .... %34 = icmp ne i32 %33, 15 br i1 %34, label %then, label %else then: ; preds = %entry %returnValue = or i1 true, false .... br label %ifmerge else: ; preds = %entry br label %ifmerge ifmerge:

Hi, >> entry: >> .... >> %34 = icmp ne i32 %33, 15 >> br i1 %34, label %then, label %else >> >> then: ; preds = %entry >> %returnValue = or i1 true, false >> .... >> br label %ifmerge >> >> else: ; preds = %entry >> br label

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Cuong Pham <phamcuongbk at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > My codegen is trying to generate some thing like this: > > entry: > .... >  %34 = icmp ne i32 %33, 15 >  br i1 %34, label %then, label %else > > then:                                             ; preds = %entry >  %returnValue = or i1 true, false > .... >

Suppose a programmer wants to inject their own global label definition into the body of a function with some guarantee that it will not be removed by the compiler. One way to do this is to define a global label with an asm statement knowing that the asm statement will not be invoked until after the compiler's optimization passes have run, but the following case demonstrates that a label

Drear there: The problem I have is to lower an intrinsic function like this ” float @llvm.write.arg(flaot %src, float* %dst) “ I am lowering it with INTRINSIC_W_CHAIN, so the return value and the value to write to dst are generated with some operations using src: " // it is the frame index node corresponding to input pointer SDvalue frindex = Op.getoperand(3); … SDValue returnValue =

The team I am working with is using asm statements containing label definitions as a way of instrumentation so that when an application is loaded into their debug and test framework, the labels will cause breakpoints to be set at strategic points where they can query the state of the processor that the application is running on. ~ Todd From: Eli Friedman [mailto:efriedma at quicinc.com] Sent:

Hi Paul, Regarding the "No Touchie!" constraint idea for asm statements: would this be a new qualifier (like volatile) that could be applied to the asm statement? Since the constraint is not necessarily associated with an input or output operand, it seems that introducing the constraint via the qualifier field might work. All, The volatile qualifier on an asm statement already

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:46 PM, sarath chandra <sarathcse19 at gmail.com>wrote: > Hi James, > > First i converted the void * to int* and then did FPToSI...then did SHL...( > because CreateShl only accepts integers... i pointer casted it to int64 type > first)... Below is the code snippet.... > > > lhs = mBuilder.CreateStructGEP(firstArg, 0); > lhs =

Okay so heres my code which works fine, i''ll explain the problem below. <% for num in 1..-04Gazou6+pmm/bHYDwDEOA@public.gmane.org %> <table class="products" id="table1" cellspacing="2" cellpadding="3" border="3"> <tr> <td> <table width="25%"> <tr> <tr> <td><%=

Some formula methods for S3 generic functions use the idiom returnValue$call <- sys.call(sys.parent()) to show how to recreate the returned object or to use as a label on a plot. It is often followed by returnValue$call[[1]] <- quote(myName) E.g., I see it in packages "latticeExtra" and "leaps", and I suspect it used in "lattice" as well. This idiom

Hi Sarath, It would have really helped if you had removed the commented out code and inlined the calls to your homemade helper functions before sending it... You are doing this, in LLVM IR: %0 = getelementptr %Value* %firstArg, i32 0 ; i8** %1 = load i8** %0 ; i8* %2 = bitcast i8* %1 to i64* %3 = getelementptr %Value* %secondArg, i32 0 ; i8** %4 = load i8** %3; i8* %5 = bitcast i8* %4 to i64*

Yeah, that's the fault...got the answer...... Thanks James for the help... Struggling with this for so many days....... On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 4:02 PM, James Molloy <James.Molloy at arm.com> wrote: > Hi Sarath,**** > > ** ** > > It would have really helped if you had removed the commented out code and > inlined the calls to your homemade helper functions before

hi guys, I have a new development server (ubuntu 10). I have done the following (the versions match my existing development machine which works fine): 1. installed ruby 1.9.1p378 2. installed ruby gems 1.3.7 3. installed rails 2.3.8 (used "gem install rails -v 2.3.8") 4. manually installed my other gems including sphinx and thinking sphinx with "gem install ..." 5. ran

Not sure if this is expected or not. Only happened with a has_one :through I had setup. (Workaround is just to remove it and go through the association manually vs has_one ..., through: .) Not a big deal if no one has time to look at it, as it''s not a big enough deal to look into a fix on our side. In Rails (3.2.9) console if I do: MyModel.reflections.each {|name,reflection|

Hi I''m new to Rails (and Ruby) and I can''t get it to work properly. Every time I want to do something with my database-connection (e.g. use scaffold) I get this, or something similiar (from development.log): >> Beneath this code there''s some more text << ------- Processing CategoryController#index (for 127.0.0.1 at Tue Apr 26 21:43:45 CEST 2005)

Hey everybody, I am currently following the depot application from the book Web Agile Development with Rails (3rd Edition) but after creating the controller for the Store and the Cart model, I am always getting a nil product, no matter how many products I add to the database. I am very new with RoR (this only the page 110 of the book) and thus I am not very sure about what I could do to mitigate

#{RAILS_ROOT}/app/controllers/start_controller.rb:13:in `create'' --- class StartController < ApplicationController def create #------------Remove Tag--------------------------- @name = params[:name] @file = params[:filepath] @file = @file.gsub!(/^.*(\\|\/)/, '''') # replace html tags with blank post = Post.save(@params["removetag"]) end end --