similar to: broadcast over gre tunnel?

we have an external 2Mbit dsl connection and running on it are several gre vpn tunnels so far i''ve given priority to the vpn traffic (using htb) can i now put rules in for the tunnels to control traffic within each tunnel (that''s where our video conferencing etc runs)? or can i only control the real interface (eth1 in our setup)? if not can i somehow see the packets inside the

I am trying to setup GRE between two CentOS 4.5 boxes. I have tried several variations of what''s listed below, but none of them work. box1: modprobe ip_gre ip link set gre0 up ip tunnel add gretun mode gre local 66.1.1.161 remote 66.1.2.161 ttl 20 dev eth0 ip addr add dev gretun 10.253.253.1 peer 10.253.253.2/24 ip link set dev gretun up ip route add 10.2.0.0/16 via 10.253.253.2 box2:

Hello Lartc Mailing List: Been working on something the last week and a half and ALMOST have it working.., just need a few pointers from the wizards on this mailing list to nail it. Ok, my setup is a hub and spoke arrangement, hub is Cisco 2821 with IOS 12.4. Spokes are ruggencom RX1000 routers, Debian based with the following versions installed: rx1000test:~# uname -a Linux rx1000test

Hello, Here is my network: ------------------ ------------- ----------- Linux box ----------- GRE --------- Cisco ---------- ------------------ ------------- What I wan to accomplish. I want ripv2 to go across (both ways) through the GRE tunnel. No packets are being passed thought the GRE

I just installed Xandros 2.0 Desktop. I used apt-get to install iproute. I then downloaded wondershaper 1.1a from the website. I edited the script as the readme says. I went to console and started the wondershaper script...and i get the following error messages. RTNETLINK answers: Invalid Argument many times. Any ideas what is wrong? MArk _______________________________________________

Hi Guys, Here is our patch to allow broadcast packets over a GRE tunnel. Hopefully it might be accepted into the source someday. You need to enabled bridging and GRE tunnels in your kernel. No other options are required. The gre patch determines what type of protocol type to put in the GRE header based on the whether the packet is forwarded from a bridge or not. To use the patch: # Create

[Disclaimer : I'm not a network engineer] Hi, In a setup where OpenVSwitch is used with GRE tunels on top of an interface provided by tinc, I'm experiencing MTU problems and I'm not sure how to fix them. The manifestation of the problem is, from the user point of view, communication hang. And using "tcpdump -i there" displays lines such as : 18:54:00.345666 IP

Greetings, I''m new to LARTC and I''m trying to solve a problem with multiple clients accessing a game server. So I thought I''d give traffic control a shot. I''ve downloaded Wonder Shaper and have added this to the default script: tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 12 u32 \ match ip protocol 0x6 0xff flowid 1:3 I''m now quite sure

Hi all Does anyone know if i can use ethernet aliases like eth0:1 in advanced routing like multipath routing in order to avoid to have nxEthernet interfaces in my Linux box. Thansk in advanced -- Guillermo Gomez <ggomez@neotechgw.net> neotech _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO:

hello, i have 2 links to the ISP of 128kbit each, and i want to balance the trafic between them, but not staticly (local ip1-5 throw isp1, and the rest to isp2). I though at a ingress clasification, then routing by the mark, and at the exit nat (yes i must do nat :(((, but the clasification must be flow based, and i dont know how to do it. C _______________________________________________ LARTC

I''m rate limiting and prioritizing traffic upstream of a slow wan link using htb, classic wonder shaper type stuff. I''m using the following command for traffic that does not match any of my defined filters: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 50 It appears that local, non-routable traffic like arps and igmp are being snared by this and end-up queued in the lowest

Hi, I just installed wondershapper 1.1a on my ipcop firewall box. I have roadrunner cable with a ftp server setup. My download speed is 2mbit (I get 225 KBytes) and my upload is 384kbit (I send at 43 KBytes). What should the settings in wshaper? I can ping yahoo.com at 90msec with little traffic.....and at around 220msec with full upload traffic. Mark

Hi, i have one firewall/gateway server with two interfaces and a routing problem (?). eth0: external interface eth1: internal interface. Both ip address are valid. Services like DNS, HTTP is configured to run using eth1 ip address. The problem is when i try to connect from internet to firewall, i can´t see eth1 ip address... only eth0 ip address. So, when i try to connect to web

Hello again, I may have a common problem to solve but it seems it is harder than I thought... I have 2 internet providers (each one having a different gateway). Behind the router there are around 100 clients that are SNAT-ed. I want some clients to be SNAT-ed to the first provider, while the others to the second one. The following lines should work: iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s

[I sent this earlier but I guess the list is subscriber-only?] I just set up wondershaper, it has a simple filter on the downstream direction to limit the bandwidth usage: tc qdisc add dev $DEV handle ffff: ingress tc filter add dev $DEV parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 u32 match ip src \ 0.0.0.0/0 police rate ${DOWNLINK}kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1 This is effective but is there any way to

Hi. Im now decribeing my problem very clearly to see if anyone could help me. I have 3 (three) nics in my system. 1 is for my internet network - (eth1) 2 are for my 2 adsl lines that i use to connect to the internet (eth2 is my "master" adsl line) and (eth0 is my "slave" adsl line). I know that to make redundance work ill have to setup the ip route and ip rule in my

Hi, I''ve modified my copy of the wondershaper script to add a few filters that allow traffic to and from a few specific ips go through with a speed of up to 100Mbits... I increased the root from 10 to 100mbit, and added this bit of code a bit further down the script; # Real time hosts for i in 62.101.244.63/32 216.74.158.11/32 216.74.158.3/32 216.74.158.57/32; do tc filter add dev

Hullo :) I appear to be having a common problem, but the standard fix hasn''t worked for me :/ I''m using a 2.4.23 kernel, with QoS options thusly: # QoS and/or fair queueing # CONFIG_NET_SCHED=y # CONFIG_NET_SCH_CBQ is not set CONFIG_NET_SCH_HTB=m # CONFIG_NET_SCH_CSZ is not set CONFIG_NET_SCH_PRIO=m CONFIG_NET_SCH_RED=m CONFIG_NET_SCH_SFQ=m CONFIG_NET_SCH_TEQL=m

Hi All, As it is written in the "Linux 2.4 Advanced Routing HOWTO" GRE tunneling has some benefits compare to IP-in-IP, on of it benefits is the ability to transport multicast traffic through a GRE tunnel. I used the mrouted daemon and I know that the daemon supports tunneling but I don''t want to use its tunneling method. Assuming I have gre0 as my tunneling device I did the

Two easy questions after having read the LARTC HOWTO document (which by the way is a *fantastic* document. Congratulations to all who contributed!) First is: Can I prioritise my "drops" on incoming traffic when the link is overloaded. ie instead of just tail dropping, can I "prefer" to drop certain classes of traffic? If so, do I do this by setting up, say, a HTB tree