similar to: Refreshing a page gives a "stack level too deep" error.

I have two classes, InstructionalObject and Assets. They both have_many of the other, implemented through a join table (so it''s like a habtm without the habtm). For the next version of our app, we''re refactoring to RESTful, and i''m having trouble with my nested resources/routes. I tried this, in routes.rb: map.resources :assets do |assets| assets.resources

Hello List, I''m trying to generate examples for some list-helpers I have coded which use in my projects. Basically, the Playlist class uses one anonymous module in has_many that acts as helper between acts_as_list and my desired API: class Playlist < ActiveRecord::Base # associations go here has_many :playlist_items, :order => :position, :dependent => :destroy has_many

In my schema, a question has_many :answers. When the validations are run on a question, and one of the answers is not valid, then i get "Answers is not valid" coming out of errors.full_messages. I don''t want this, i''m already testing the validity of the answers and this is an ugly and uninformative error message. It looks like it''s the message i would get

Hi, I''m having a rather annoying problem which can only be explained with an example, so here we go. I have a Person class which has_many :assets. An Asset has_one :game. I would like every Person''s asset to be sorted by its game''s title, similar to this: has_many :assets, :order => ''game.title'' That doesn''t seem to work. A

e.g. class Asset < ActiveRecord::Base validates_presence_of :asset_number, :make, :model, :location, :name, :serial_number validates_numericality_of :asset_number validates_uniqueness_of :asset_number belongs_to :user belongs_to :location belongs_to :asset_type, :foreign_key => ''type_id'' end class Location < ActiveRecord::Base validates_presence_of :name

Hi, I am working on a project that is using Paperclip to upload multiple images to an Asset model. my Post model has_many Assets. As per this tutorial/screencast... https://github.com/Emerson/Multiple-File-Uploads-with-Paperclip-and-Rails-3/blob/master/app/views/posts/show.html.erb"> http://www.emersonlackey.com/article/paperclip-with-rails-3> This all works fine and I can

Im having an issue that seems to only happen when trying to use a transaction. Ive used transactions many times in the past and Im at a loss as to why im getting the stack level too deep problem. SystemStackError - stack level too deep: actionpack (3.2.13) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/reloader.rb:70:in `'' I have a StackOveflow with more detail -

I am currently working on a small database project to track company assets. Right now my Database consists of 3 tables. 1 for the equipment, 1 for the users info, and 1 for the type of equipment. I have all 3 databases working on a model test site using RoR. Where i am having trouble is getting the databases to talk together. I can''t find this answer anywhere else. My main table

I am displaying a bunch of records from a table called "assets". Next to each record i have a checkbox. When this box is checked i want to be able to save the id of the record into another table called "flagged_assets". All I need is the ID, nothing else. Im struggling with the logic to save to another table. I know how to do it if the asset_id is already in the

In 2fe70c1 (last year), rails changed from a static list of assets.paths to automatically register any path under assets/*. (This was not reflected in Rails Guides so I pushed an update to docrails.) However, in my opinion, these automatic asset paths create confusion. The result is that the first-level directories under `(app|lib|vendor)/assets` get swallowed and if I put assets into a

hey all In my schema, Lesson is many to many with Asset (through join table ''elements''), which are also many to many with Resource (through join table ''items''). This is all done with totally standard "has_many :through" - Lesson has_many :elements, :dependent => :destroy, :order => :position has_many :assets, :through => :elements,

I have two models: assets and makes. Make has many assets and an asset belongs to one make. I am calling this part of my asset controller from a search form with the parameters "search" (search term) and "field" (database field heading) which then renders a partial with the search results on it. ######################################################## if

I have two objects Task and Asset and I want to view image in show task. Here is my to models Task.rb has_many Assets :as => :attachable And Asset.rb has_attached_file :photo, :styles => { :large => "371*251>", :small => "72*72>"}, :url => "/assets/:id/", :path =>

Hi All, I am making a DAM (seems to be the hip thing to do these days). It is for the company that I work for. We have some really weird domain rules that have prevented me from just using a simple directory structure file permission system. I have come up with a solution but I wanted to run it by you gurus to ensure that I am not recompiling the wheel here. Basically the domain rule is: A user

Hi, I am doing an eager loading in ruby on rails using below statement ------------------------ Article.find(:all, :include => [:asset, :vote], :conditions=>"assets.parent_id is null", :order=>"stat_final_ranking desc", :limit=>20) --------------------------------------- the above statement resulted in this expensive query.

Didn''t have quite enough space to describe it there...basically i''m having a problem with the :uniq option in my tags. I''m using acts_as_taggable_on_steroid which adds these associations to my Resource class: Resource has_many :taggings, :as => :taggable, :dependent => :destroy, :include => :tag has_many :tags, :through => :taggings, :uniq => true

Just monkey patched Sprockets in our Rails 3.2.9 app to override the Cache-Control header for html assets that we need to tweak more often in development, but that we don''t want to use digests/fingerprinting with: # Sprockets 2.x patch if Rails.env.development? module Sprockets module Server private alias_method :sprockets_headers, :headers def headers(env,

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2224994/why-are-double-sided-polymorphic-relationships-lacking-in-rails -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Hello, I''m having a bit of trouble with the asset pipeline and, I think, Capistrano. In my app layout I have: <%= stylesheet_link_tag "application", "bootstrap" %> And the relevant bits of the app dir structure are: app/assets/stylesheets/application.css.scss # Contains ''require_self'' and ''require_tree .'' as usual

Dear All, I am using package fPortfolio to run minimum variance portfolio optimizations in R. I already know how to set portfolioSpecs, portfolio objects and constraints. Unfortunately I am not able to set the following type of constraints. I have a timeSeries object with returns data for roughly 1.5k assets for 261 subperiods (workingdays) and want to compute the global minimum variance