similar to: masquerade and tc problem

Dear all. I have data that looks like this: Biller Cycle Jan Feb Mar Apr May JuneAB 1 100 150 150 200 300 450JL 2 650 600 750 700 850 800JL 3 700 740 680 690 700 580IR 1 455 400 405 410 505 550IR 4 600 650 700 750 650 680IR 5 100 150 120 130 140 190IR 9 600 640 630 625 680 690 For each biller and cycle, I want to determine the six

I want to use DRb within my Rails app. Right now I''ve got a very basic class: class PaymentGateway cattr_accessor :ssl_config, :host, :port def self.gateway @@gateway ||= new end def process(amount, card, type = :auth) @biller.process(amount, card, type) end def set_card(user_id, number) @biller.set_card(user_id, number) end protected def initialize

In Excel, I have data that looks like this. Month Seg Prod Biller Cycle Sales 1/1/2008 A Table Phyllis 1 500 1/1/2008 A Table Phyllis 2 600 1/1/2008 A Table Phyllis 3 650 1/1/2008 A Table Doreen 1 345 1/1/2008 A Table Doreen 2 451 1/1/2008 A Table Doreen 6 550 1/1/2008 A Table Doreen 9 590 1/1/2008 A Table Doreen 11 860 1/1/2008 A Chair Phyllis 1 300 1/1/2008 A Chair Phyllis 2 350

Suppose: ipchains -A forward -s inside_net -d 0/0 -j MASQ -m 100 (similar setup with iptables: iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -s inside_net -d 0/0 -j SNAT iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -s inside_net -d 0/0 -j MARK --set_mark 100) eth0 = outside iface eth1 = inside iface now: tc filter add dev eth0 ... handle 100 fw should catch packets marked by the above rule in ipchains (iptables). Ok. When

Hi Tinc Mailing-Group, I am a bit stuck with firewalling rules at the moment. Maybe someone could please advise me a good rc.firewall script to use on my setup. If anyone runs an ipchains firewall script on their linux box which is ALSO running tinc, could they please mail it to me, for my perusal. I have tinc pre3 set up and working on my systems, however I can only get it to work if I set the

Hi, I''m running a Debian 2.2r2 on a university server with 3 public ip on one ethernet card (but soon we will have three cards). There''s a tunnel (implemented with vtund on a tun interface with local address 192.168.1.10 and remote 192.168.1.20) from this server to another server without public ip and behind a router. I wanted to make the second server visible to the world, so

Dear Tinc Experts, I have been struggling for some time now, with Tinc pre3, and firewall rulesets and routing. I did once manage to get Tinc to work okay in a test-bed environment. I then tried to set it up for a 'real-life' setup and cannot get it to work properly. My real-life setup looks like this: Network A: 192.168.1.0 / 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.7 tap1 device gateway >

To all those that wanted to know how I was filtering particular ICMP packets here is a few snippets from my firewall script which is based on one by Ian Hall-Beyer. I hope this helps you get started. Also note the output of the command: ipchains -h icmp Shawn Mitchell mentioned blocking all ICMP echos and especially broadcast echos. Perhaps he''d care to elaborate with a similar

Howdy, I tried tackling this on irc with Ivo, but I suspect that irc may really not be the best medium for technical discussions, so I'll reprise it here. I am trying to duplicate the "tinc from behind a masquerading firewall" example from the tinc web site: (home) <--> (masquerading firewall) <--> (office) 192.168.1.21 192.168.1.1/1.2.3.4

1. Have you looked here: https://cran.r-project.org/web/views/Spatial.html (I assume you have done some web searches on possible terms like "3D Earth Data R" or whatever) 2. You might try posting on the r-sig-geo list rather than here, where relative expertise may more likely be available. Cheers, Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along

Hi Folks, I''m using a 2.4.x kernel and TC from the iproute2 package so that I can limit traffic through my gateway. I''m using this to mark packets when they leave the LAN: /sbin/ipchains -A forward -j MASQ -i eth0 -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d 0.0.0.0/0 -m 1 When the packets return, I need to have them marked again so that the ingress filter will limit the bandwidth in the opposite

If you have "value" as a function of latitude and radius, isn't that a 2D (not 3D) scalar field? Which can be plotted using a regular heatmap. If you want a curved edge where depth=0 (radius=?), that's not too difficult to achieve. Not quite sure what continent boundaries mean in this context, but that could possibly be added to. Or do you want a 2D slice superimposed within a

Hi everybody, why in the new 3.0.3/4 when a new windows machine join on domain samba search (in ldap backend) on ou=Users and not in ou=computers? my smb.conf: ldap passwd sync = Yes ldap admin dn = "cn=ldap manager,dc=intra,dc=local" ldap suffix = dc=intra,dc=local ldap group suffix = ou=Groups ldap user suffix = ou=Users ldap machine

I just recently installed OpenSSH 2.5.1p1 on a RH6.2 box (kernel 2.2.17). I run ipchains to do packet filtering, allowing incoming connections only to 22 and 80 (and some other ports for specific machines). I was able to run prior versions of openssh in this fashion (I've run it from the first release, I think). Upon installing 2.5.1p1 I found that my attempts to connect hang, here is ssh

Hello David, After some experiments and discussions I came to the following result concerning private NT-Box connecting to a LAN via ipchains and using all NETBIOS services (incl. domain-logon): Cross-subnet browsing with NETBIOS could only be done by a local master browser in the private net. I first thought of using Samba on the Linux router for that. But the Samba service would have to use

I figured this out -- looks like 2.5.1p1 is now using ports < 1024 on the client side (wasn't before?). I had a ipchains rule to allow ACK packets to 1024:65535, which was good enough for <= 2.3.0p1 : #allow only ACK tcp packed ipchains -A input -j ACCEPT -i eth0 -s any/0 --dport 1024:65535 -p tcp ! -y So I added the following : #allow return from ssh connections ipchains -A input -j

Hi Raymond, I also struggled 3 days to set up a direct connection between a RH7.3 box and a WinME box with a crossover cable for experiment and met with frustration. The setup of WinME box has no problem and it can connect to other Win boxes for file sharing. IP Address RH7.3 192.168.0.1 WinME 192.168.0.2 Ping started connecting but both boxes can't see each another. I also doubt

---------- Forwarded message ---------- Received: from lists.securityfocus.com (lists.securityfocus.com [216.102.46.4]) by blues.jpj.net (right/backatcha) with SMTP id VAA15167 for <trevor@JPJ.NET>; Tue, 27 Jul 1999 21:17:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 28179 invoked from network); 27 Jul 1999 19:14:06 -0000 Received: from lists.securityfocus.com (216.102.46.4) by lists.securityfocus.com

Thanks for your idea. It should be a 2D slice/plane embedded into a 3D space. Could be static, I just need to make a single figure from it for illustration of the Earth together with its interior in 3D. So, the interior would be a slice in 2D along a fixed longitude. And along this 2D slice would be a heatmap. Again, embedded in 3D, since it would be shown as a slice of Earth in 3D. Duncan?s

On Mar 28, 2009, at 1:34 AM, Mihai Balint wrote: > On Mar 28, 2009, at 4:39 AM, Anthony Danalis wrote: >> On Mar 27, 2009, at 9:15 PM, Dan Gohman wrote: >>> >>> On Mar 26, 2009, at 8:28 AM, Mihai Balint wrote: >>>> This summer however, I plan to create an "optimization" that >>>> automatically fixes memory leaks in programs - obviously