similar to: Net::LDAP

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 11000 matches similar to: "Net::LDAP"

2007 Dec 11
0
Net::ldap no bind result
Hi, im having some trouble using net::ldap. bind doesnt return anything (not even false) i basically use this code: user,psw = ''test'', ''test'' ldap = Net::LDAP.new(:host => ''myldapserverip'', :port => 636, :base =>''dc=ehb,dc=be'', :auth => {:method => :simple, :username => user, :password => psw) if
2011 May 05
1
functions pandit and treebase in the package apTreeshape
Hello. I'm trying to use the functions pandit and treebase. They are in the package apTreeshape. Once I've loaded the package, R responses: - no function pandit/treebase. Somebody knows why or what is the reason? Thanks, Arnau. ------------------------------------------------------------ Arnau Mir Torres Edifici A. Turmeda Campus UIB Ctra. Valldemossa, km. 7,5 07122 Palma de Mca.
2008 Nov 28
1
Rails Beginner.. NoMethodError
Dear all I encounter error when I login my Web application NoMethodError in AdminController#login undefined method `get_title'' for #<Class:0x63ac78> Here is part of my code controller/admin_controller.rb def login session[:user_id] = nil if request.post? if User.authenticate(params[:name], params[:password]) user = User.find_by_name(params[:name])
2015 Jan 27
0
Minutes of Jan 27 2015 VIRT SIG Meeting
Hi all, seems we are making good progress. Thank you everyone! * First Xen release via the SIG is imminent (see Xen section) * We are also close to a Docker release (see Docker section) * We also need to look at cross-SIG dependencies to be able to make use of Gluster support in the Storage SIG (see oVirt section) Regards Lars = Attendees = * Lars Kurth * George Dunlap * Sandro Bonazzola *
2008 Sep 03
4
delta index in Sphinx
Hello, all! Help me please to solve problem with Sphinx and its delta index. Configuration file is located in attachment to this topic. ------------------------------------------------------------------- mysql> select id, e_mail from users where e_mail LIKE ''%test%''; -------------------------------------------------------------------
2005 Aug 10
1
Firewall will definately increase jitters inyourvoice conversation
Wiley is definitely right. It would be dangerous not to have a firewall for security reasons. -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Wiley Siler Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 2:27 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Firewall will definately
2014 Dec 02
0
Virt SIG meeting minutes 2 Dec 2014
Below are the meeting minutes from today's meeting. Let me know if there are any additions or corrections. -George --- Attendees: Lokesh, George, Sandro, Lars. Agenda: - Docker update - Xen update - CBS (Can't do w/o KB) - oVirt questions Docker update (Lokesh): - Docker 1.3.2 in centos virt7-testing - "Not giving much trouble in CentOS" - going to update Docker
2006 Sep 08
0
Ruby on Rails Job - Northern, VA
Send your reply to myitrecruiter-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org Web Application Engineer The ideal candidate will have experience developing rich web applications (AJAX, XHTML, JavaScript, XML, CSS etc). We are looking for candidates with strong user-interface instincts. The successful candidate will have a passion for delivering high quality software and possess a high degree of
2005 Aug 10
2
Firewall will definately increase jittersinyourvoice conversation
Absolutely. Lokesh, I suggest you go to the Wiki and check out the security issues inherint in the implementation of SIP in Asterisk. http://voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20security http://voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+security+dialplan -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On
2015 Feb 13
1
docker 1.5 in virt7-testing
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:15:39PM +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote: > hi guys, > > docker 1.5 is now in virt7-testing repos, please test and feedback so we > can move to release.. > > thanks lokesh! > > - KB > Sure thing KB. Also, docker-registry will be ready for release by tonight (meaning working package and docs etc.) docker HEAD for c7 ------------------ I was
2018 Dec 24
1
NT_STATUS_NETWORK_SESSION_EXPIRED Domain member
I’m not sure if it will help you but we’re seeing something similar that I call the “10 hours problem” here. On any Samba - after 4.7.6 (we’re currently trying out 4.9.4 but still no go) - at 10 hours after it (smbd & winbindd) was restarted it new connections often (but not 100% all the time, but we think it is related to the number of connections, or active connections, or how many are
2015 Jan 19
2
SIG repo layout and conflicts between projects within a SIG
At the moment, we're essentially using yum repos as the "patch" mechanism to CentOS Base: SIGs populate a repo with packages they want to add / override, and all other packages default to Base. The current setup is that every sig has exactly one production repo per CentOS version. Also, we seem to be wanting to see SIGs not as individual projects, but to make the 'G' an
2016 Jun 10
2
[CentOS-devel] docker and docker-latest packages on CentOS Virt SIG
Moving this discussion to centos-virt@ as it's upto the SIG to decide on how this moves ahead. I'm hoping to have 2 new koji tag sets: virt7-docker-fedora-* (will have fedora rpms rebuilt) virt7-docker-el-* (will have rhel candidate builds before they are released or land in centos extras) The -el-* repos will help to have Virt SIG as sort of an upstream and early QA for both RHEL and
2015 Mar 13
0
docker 1.5 in virt7-testing
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:15:39PM +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote: > hi guys, > > docker 1.5 is now in virt7-testing repos, please test and feedback so we > can move to release.. > > thanks lokesh! > > - KB > KB, Just curious what's the latest re: docker testing and release? Also, where do people report bugs/issues for docker on centos? (can't find any in my
2016 Jan 14
0
hoping to reschedule SIG meetings to Tuesdays 1500 UTC
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5 at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > I can't make it to the current schedule for alternate Tuesday 1400 UTC > meetings. > > I was hoping we could reschedule it to 1500 UTC on the same Tuesdays > instead, or > any other slot which could work for all. > > What do other members think? > Ok for me > -- >
2016 Mar 01
0
docker 1.10.2 available
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Lokesh Mandvekar" <lsm5 at fedoraproject.org> > To: centos-virt at centos.org > Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 9:17:59 AM > Subject: [CentOS-virt] docker 1.10.2 available > > Docker 1.10.2 has just been built for virt7-docker-common-candidate > https://cbs.centos.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=78901 > > Please give it a
2016 Mar 01
0
docker 1.10.2 available
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Lokesh Mandvekar" <lsm5 at fedoraproject.org> > To: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS" <centos-virt at centos.org> > Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2016 12:09:47 PM > Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] docker 1.10.2 available > > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 12:43:32PM -0500, Jason Brooks wrote: > > I'm
2007 Jun 29
0
Continuous_builder question...PLEASE HELP!!!
Hi, I am trying to build a simple (at least that is what I thought after reading Rails Recipes # 46) continuous integration process into my subversion source repository. I am working on windows by the way. I can get the post-commit hook to execute the rake command in the correct build directory when I do a commit from my working directory. But the problem is I am getting a: "system cannot
2016 Jan 12
3
hoping to reschedule SIG meetings to Tuesdays 1500 UTC
I can't make it to the current schedule for alternate Tuesday 1400 UTC meetings. I was hoping we could reschedule it to 1500 UTC on the same Tuesdays instead, or any other slot which could work for all. What do other members think? -- Lokesh Freenode: lsm5 GPG: 0xC7C3A0DD -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type:
2016 Mar 07
2
status for centos-release-docker and docker packages
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 08:33:31PM +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote: > Let me look through the bits and see where we are and get this process > started up. We'd need to get some basic testing done, and then we can > promote it a bit. > > is the docker-1.10 stack completely in-place replacement/upgrade from > the existing distro hosted docker ( 1.8.2 ? ) Not a replacement for