similar to: Time to rewrite DBMS, says Ingres founder

Dear R Forum members, I am wondering of anyone has used R to pull data from an Ingres SQL database? My initial thoughts would be to use the RJDBC package and Ingres's JDBC driver. Before I get this thing together, has anyone used this combination and can verify that it works, or can forewarn me of any "gotchas" that may be lurking in the shadows? One uncomfortable feature with

Do you guys know if anyone is working in Ingres adapter for Rails? thanks, -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060412/ed717cd6/attachment.html

What happens if I mark only some type of traffic for beeing shaped ? Is it put on a separate queue, so the traffinc not marked has some priority ?? -- __o _ \<_ (_)/(_) Saludos de Julián EA4ACL -.- Foro Wireless Madrid http://opennetworks.rg3.net

Ruby on Rails is easier to use than J2EE. http://www.regdeveloper.co.uk/2006/07/03/ruby_rails_part1/ http://www.regdeveloper.co.uk/2006/07/17/ruby_rails_part2/ -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

> if so, the assembly language docs say that > program behavior is undefined if such a function > ever returns. Yes, that's true, but for some static analysis applications such as control dependence analysis for programs that have arbitrary interprocedural control flow, one needs these additional non-executable control flow edges from noreturn functions to their immediate CFG

On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Max Stonebraker<max.stonebraker at gmail.com> wrote: > Is there any way to avoid having the unreachables inserted in the first > place? If there's sensible control flow after a function returns, don't mark it or calls to it noreturn. If in fact cannot return, the concept of control flow after the function returns fundamentally makes no sense.

> If there's sensible control flow after a function returns, don't mark > it or calls to it noreturn. How do I prevent llvm-gcc from labelling a particular function with the noreturn attribute so an unreachable is not inserted after a call to it? Does llvm-gcc keep a list of functions somewhere that it thinks do not return? Max On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Eli Friedman

What do you mean by "terminating function call"? Is it one with the "noreturn" attribute? if so, the assembly language docs say that program behavior is undefined if such a function ever returns. If your function could possibly return, it needs to not have that attribute. On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Max Stonebraker<max.stonebraker at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello

In a wiki, routes are handling web_index /:web {:controller=>"wiki", :action=>"index"} web_topic /:web/:topic {:controller=>"wiki", :action=>"view"} action /:web/:topic/:action {:controller=>"wiki"} That is the default action is "view". Two questions: 1. Can I constrain the patterns allowed for

Setup: RedHat 7.2 running Samba 3.0.20-1 Mixed clients with XP-SP2 and 2000-SP4 I just upgraded from 3.0.14a-1 to 3.0.20-1 and noticed the following errors when logging in from an XP machine: Aug 22 06:46:23 yoda2 smbd[1676]: [2005/08/22 06:46:23, 0] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_mem_get(532) Aug 22 06:46:23 yoda2 smbd[1676]: prs_mem_get: reading data of size 4 would overrun buffer. Aug 22

Hi. I am getting loads of errors "no backend defined for idmap config MYDOMAIN" after I upgraded from 3.5 -> 3.6 a couple of days ago. I read http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_3.6_Features_added/changed and did what man smb.conf suggested: idmap config MYDOMAIN : backend = tdb idmap config MYDOMAIN : range = 500-1999999 yet I still receive those errors. I used

On Aug 26, 2009, at 6:40 PM, Max Stonebraker wrote: > Hello, > > Does the LLVM Andersens alias analysis handle function pointers > precisely? I ran it and it looks like it says every function points > points to the universal set. Is this what I should expect? Hi Max, I don't know the answer offhand but please keep in mind that the current andersen's pass has many

Thanks for the reply. Would you happen to know whether there a global alias analysis written for LLVM that is more robust? Is the Steensgaard pass any more reliable? Max On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > At one point it handled function pointers. > As chris says, it's buggy and probably broken. > Some function pointers also do

There is no 2.3 release of poolalloc. This is a research project at UIUC and they do not do releases of it. -Tanya On Aug 23, 2009, at 6:25 PM, Max Stonebraker wrote: > Hello, > > How do I download the poolalloc module for llvm 2.3? This is the svn > command I was trying but it doesn't work: > > svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/poolalloc/RELEASE_23 > >

At one point it handled function pointers. As chris says, it's buggy and probably broken. Some function pointers also do point to the universal set (like global function pointers). On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Chris Lattner<clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On Aug 26, 2009, at 6:40 PM, Max Stonebraker wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Does the LLVM Andersens alias analysis

Might I suggest the following patch, because this issue has bite me too? You're lured in by the initial good results from the Andersens alias analysis, only to discover the bugs later on. Robert Zeh On Aug 26, 2009, at 9:11 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Aug 26, 2009, at 6:40 PM, Max Stonebraker wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Does the LLVM Andersens alias analysis handle

Tanya Lattner wrote: > There is no 2.3 release of poolalloc. This is a research project at > UIUC and they do not do releases of it. We have not done scheduled releases of the poolalloc source code. In the past, we have merely kept the SVN version updated with LLVM mainline (more or less). If you want to use DSA or poolalloc, I recommend that you update to the upcoming LLVM 2.6 release

I am a consultant needing to learn virtual machines. Using XEN Server 6 as tool. I will put real internet servers on it when stable. Been working fine till it crashed out of the blue. This problem is from a full wipe and reload. Problem: 1. Build XEN Server 6. Works fine after install reboot. 2. Reboot XEN Server. Big message "The underlying Xen xapi is not running"

I have found several instances where rsync refuses to copy a new file. I am using it to sync changes from a staging web server to production servers, and there are certain files that it just plain won't copy. The file is totally new. No such name has ever existed on the target server(, or on the source server until now). In this instance, I added 3 completely new files to the same

First I'd like to thank you, and everyone who has contributed to the isolinux development. It has been the solution to many of my development needs. Currently I am creating a Linux system that runs directly from CD. Currently the CD is working and I am using isolinux to boot the CD. The compressed kernel is approximately 2 meg and the compressed initial ramdisk is approximately 4 meg.