similar to: Nude Pic & Chat in Texas Women

http://arealtgp.servik.com/bdsm/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

############################## http:\\lakshmiraiprofile.blogspot.com ############################## --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

We still have some tickets available for the Women in Compilers and Tools reception that is held the night before the 2018 Euro LLVM Developers’ Meeting in Bristol, UK. Tickets are available here. https://www.eventbrite.com/e/2018-european-llvm-developers-meeting-women-in-compilers-and-tools-reception-tickets-42287427835 This is an evening reception on April 15th that includes dinner, drinks,

Hi everyone, X.Org will join the Outreach Program for Women (OPW) in Round 9 (December 2014 - March 2015). The OPW is "open to anyone who was assigned female at birth and anyone who identifies as a woman, genderqueer, genderfluid, or genderfree regardless of gender presentation or assigned sex at birth." For more details on the program see https://wiki.gnome.org/OutreachProgramForWomen

For upwards of 40 years North Face backyard clothing along with gear company continues to be the most trustworthy origin with regard to outside lovers everywhere. This really is the same to North face apex bionic jacket sale (http://www.northerfacestore.com/north-face-apex-bionic-c-5.html)wool jumper, which is made to supply it person the ideal combination of kind, match, purpose, and comfort.

Dear r-devel list members, I've recently encountered the following problem using predict() with a model that has raw-polynomial terms. (Actually, I encountered the problem using model.frame(), but the source of the error is the same.) The problem is technical and concerns the design of poly(), which is why I'm sending this message to r-devel rather than r-help. To illustrate:

I'm writing a script to sync some mp3 files. Due to a limitation in the number of destination files that can be read from my thumb drive, I'm not looking to preserve the original file structure (actually, I'm looking to sync *only the files* to the new destination directory). The source files are all subfolders under /backup/Music: ./Adrian Legg/Mrs. Crowe's Blue Waltz/Paddy

Hello, In the following I tried 3 versions of an example in R help. Only the two first predict command work. After : library(splines) require(stats) 1) fm1 <- lm(weight ~ bs(height, df = 5), data = women) ht1 <- seq(57, 73, len = 200) ph1 <- predict(fm1, data.frame(height=ht1)) # OK plot(women, xlab = "Height (in)", ylab = "Weight (lb)") lines(ht1, ph1) 2)

I am wanting to use the "[" operator in an S-chunk, e.g. <<>>= str(women) women$height women[,1] "["(women,1) @ to show the equivalence of three methods of extracting an element from a data.frame. However Sweave returns the last of these as women[1] in the S input chunk How can I force it not to do this and return "["(women,1)

Hello Group, I am having trouble with the sqldf package on unix. The same code works fine on windows. Silly Example script: # Load the package library(sqldf) # Use the titanic data set data(women) colnames(women) head(women) sqldf('select height, count(*) from women where height is not null group by weight') Unix Output and error: bash-3.00$ R --vanilla <testR.R

Hello there, I have two groups (men and women) and I know per group how many of them smoke or don't smoke (women 40 of 200; men 100 of 300). I would like to know how I can compare in R if men and women differ significantly in their smoking. However, because there are more men in the sample than women I cannot just compare the number of smokers and non-smokers in both groups, right?! (I would

(I enlarged this mail from r-core to r-devel since it's an interesting question for general discussion.) Douglas Bates wrote: > > In a recent r-patched I notice that when df is a data.frame > as(df, "list") does not propagate the names whereas as.list(df) does. > Is this intentional? Well, it's explicit anyway. The as() function uses method dispatch for coerce()

I am trying to import a SPSS.sav file into R. The attached file is not technically the file I am trying to import, but does replicate my problem. The actual file is much too large to attach. No matter what I do, I can not get R (base or Hmisc) to apply the value labels in the .sav file to the dataframe created in R. Here's the code that I am using. maine <- spss.get("test.sav") #

Hi all, I got curious about something, so in proper scientific fashion I obtained some data and analyzed it. Question: what is the female participation in the R-help email list? Data: the most recent list postings, obtained from the website. I took my best shot at classifying the names given in the email header as male/female, but ended with a fair number of unknowns. This dataset had 2797

Hello, everybody: I'm back to share a long piece of example code. Because I had trouble understanding the role of par() and margins when customizing barplots, I have struggled with this example. In case you are a student wanting to place legends or textual markers in the outer regions of a barplot, you might run these examples. There are a few little things I don't quite understand.

Any thoughts on the following? Am I missing something? [I am running R for Windows 0.63.1 on a Win NT 4.0 (workstation, sevice pack #4) box.] Thanks. FC. R : Copyright 1998, The R Development Core Team Version 0.63.1 Beta (Dec 5, 1998) R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. You are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type "?license" or

I've just discovered R and think it is terrific. I quickly reproduced results with a few lines of R commands that 7 years ago I had to do with a larger fortran code and many calls to NAG routines. (I'm mostly a computational plasma physicist, but occasionally delve into statistical analysis of data.) But I've come accross a very peculiar behavior of attached objects that cost me

Am 05.05.2016 um 23:19 schrieb Tanya Lattner: > Having a code of conduct like this is just as bad as having no code > of conduct at all. It trivializes the importance of a code of conduct > and its pretty much impossible to enforce. Regardless of what kind CoC you have: if it comes to having to enforce it, the community has stopped being open and welcoming. So I think this approach is

As part of carrying out a complicated maximum likelihood estimation, I am trying to learn to program likelihoods in R. I started with a simple probit model but am unable to get the code to work. Any help or suggestions are most welcome. I give my code below: ************************************ mlogl <- function(mu, y, X) { n <- nrow(X) zeta <- X%*%mu llik <- 0 for (i in 1:n) { if

Hi Hannah, Yes, that does give me more insight. The polygyny only doesn't matter, for even if there was polyandry it could be coded in the same way. If I understand this correctly you have one variable (SPRULE) that must contain information about the household of the individual and the identities of his (or her) relationship partner(s). The household number can accommodate up to three