similar to: prio on fw and u32

hello... 1. Is it possible using u32 to filter marked packets? I have found only documents to fw filter to filter marked packets... 2. If u32 cannot filter marked packets is it possible to use fw and u32 together? I wanted to filter packets marked by iptables by fw, and packets depended on ip destination, src and others by u32, but something goes wrong :( the filters configuration is: $TC

PROBLEM: My filtering rules don''t seem to be working in the latest incarnation of my shaping script. I''ve changed from using multiple HTB classes to just one and a PRIO qdisc, and now my filters don''t seem to have any effect. OVERVIEW: What I used to have is pretty much the same as the htb wondershaper script (with some tweaks), which worked fine, but I noticed that my

Hi, I have a router/firewall running Linux (like the most of you) and I wanted to do some traffic control. I''ve created an root PRIO qdisc like the example in paragraph 9.5.3.1 (http://www.lartc.org/howto/lartc.qdisc.classful.html#AEN903) with three SFQ child-classes. I wanted for interactive (ssh, telnet, ftp-control) and dns-traffic to be placed in the first queue, http should go in

Hello, I am using a simple script, which is based on prio. The point is, that it is not possible to use htb on wifi networks, so I thought that prio will work fine, but it does almost nothing. All I wanted was to make the important packets like icmp, games, VoIP,... to go first, and to slow the things like FTP data transfer, etc. When I use $TC -s qdisc show dev ${IFACE}, I see, that the

Hey, I have such a script: tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1:0 htb default 21 r2q 2 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:0 classid 1:11 htb rate 100mbit tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:11 classid 1:21 htb rate 512kbit ceil 512kbit tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:11 classid 1:23 htb rate 1024kbit ceil 1024kbit tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:11 classid 1:25 htb rate 3072kbit

Hi all. I have a bridge running Linux 2.4.24 that I use as a bandwidth manager on a broadband wireless network. I''m using HTB and SFQ to prioritize that share bandwidth on a per-cell basis. My IP tables rules divide the traffic based on IPand traffic type (using layer-7 filter and ipp2p). My goal is to make sure that p2p traffic on the network doesn''t sink all of the

Hi, I''ve try to use htb to limit outgoing traffic but it seems that it doesn''t work. I guess the probem is the filter. Here is my script. #!/bin/sh echo "Add root qdisc, default traffic go to 1:30" tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 30 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100mbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:10

Hi, I have config like this ,... but all traffic goes to the default class 1:4, WHY ? What I'' doing wrong... filters are attached to the root ! tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1:0 root htb default 4 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:4 htb rate 55kbit ceil 55kbit prio 7 <--default class tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 20Mbit tc qdisc add dev

Is it possible to create 1 filter rule using fw selectors AND u32 selectors? Richard. -- ___________________________________________________________________ Recursion: see recursion +------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Richard Lucassen, Utrecht | | Public key and email address: | |

Hi, I''m trying to use prio qdisc with htb, however not the "usual" way (like for example FairNAT). Here is my idea: Root has HTB shaping traffic to link speed -> then goes PRIO queues -> each prio queue has HTB with sublasses for each user, should look like this: 1: htb qdisc | 1:1 htb class

Hello LARTC!!!! There is a question that kills me everytime I think about it. I just love HTB and for one year since I started to work wih it I had no complains until one day. One client needs to allocate the shared bandwith , based on priorities. The HTB as everybody knows have the CEIL parameter and also PRIO which are supposed to solve the problem. Now the problem: I configure everything, rate

Hi, I wanted to implement some QOS on my Linux Box with HTB, but after some time spend on the configuration and tests, I still don''t manage to have some correct results. Here are the details : -ROOT 2000 kbits -HIGHPRIO SUBCLASS 50 kbits prio 0 -SUBCLASS1 750 kbits prio 1 -SERVICE1 250 kbits prio 1

Hi all. I''ve written a small htb script that uses U32 and FW (marked by IPTABLES) filters, but TC doesn''t seem to be using the "cls_fw.o" module !!! I''m using redhat v9.0, kernel 2.4.8-20, iproute 2.4.7-7. Here is my script: ========================================================== ##################### #Interface definition #####################

Hi, In my LAN Iam trying to make following setup: - All the traffic generated by 10.0.2.1 should go to 10.0.2.11, If the destination of this traffic is internet than it should be placed on its interface eth1. Outgoing traffic on eth1 should be shaped.For this I am using fw filters and cbq. _______ 10.0.2.1 -------> 10.0.2.11(eth0 )----| A

Hi all, Here is a RRD graph ive just made of my packet shaping setup: http://www.overclockers.com.au/~mwp/temp/tc-1hour.png The app creating the P-25 traffic is bittorrent on the Linux box also doing the shaping. P-22 and P-23 is created by FTP transfers. Starts with bittorrent running. At 00:03, an FTP transfer is started on "cool.comp" (windows box). At 00:09, bittorrent is

Hi all, After reading a lot and searching on the INternet, I want to filter ASP and/or AH traffic According to /etc/protocols ESP and AH are IP protos 50 and 51 so this u32 filter should work ? (I can use fw filter because the firewall/VPN can''t mark pakets :-( tc filter add dev ethX parent X:0 protocol ip prio X u32 match ip protocol 50 0xff flowid X:XX ? Can someone confirm this ?

Hi all... How do i set U32 to filter a port range, instead of a single port? In normal use: source port 80 we use: "... match ip sport 80 0xffff ..." - I know that is something about the 0xffff parameter.... I need to filter ports 1 ~ 1024 to a higher priority class... i tried with IPTABLES MARK and TC FW, but it''s not working.... (...) # iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p

HTB and imq was used to control traffic. AC="tc class add dev eth0 parent" $AC 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100kbps burst 2k $AC 1:2 classid 1:10 htb rate 50kbps ceil 100kbps burst 2k prio 1 $AC 1:2 classid 1:11 htb rate 50kbps ceil 100kbps burst 2k prio 2 $AC 1:2 classid 1:12 htb rate 50kbps ceil 100kbps burst 2k please tell me if i do not set prio, what is the default prio? low delay class

Hello there, I''m trying to do some prio qdisc, but it doesn''t seem to work. Can anybody tell me why ??? here is my simple prio qdisc script: OPTIONS="bandwidth 100mbit allot 1514 maxburst 20 prio 3 avpkt 1000" IPTABLES="/usr/local/bin/iptables.static" INTERNAL=eth0 EXTERNAL=eth1 tc qdisc del dev eth0 root 2>/dev/null tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle

Hi! Could somebody tell me, what is difference between these two prio parameters in http://lartc.org/lartc.html#AEN2241 1) tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate ${UPLINK}kbit burst 6k prio 1 ^^^^^^ AND 2) tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 10 u32 match ip tos 0x10 0xff flowid 1:10