similar to: Need help with HTB

//Just to not forget eth0 is WAN and eth1 is LAN . The box is NATing my lan. I configured tcng to shape both download and upload and i got connection loss again. Maybe it is my script fault or it is something bad with packets marking . this is how i mark outgoing packets iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p tcp -s 192.168.1.23 -j MARK --set-mark $ip and this part of my script which is intented

Martin Devera wrote: > If you read the manual, the algorithm will not work correctly > with {,c}burst < MTU ... > devik > I just tried to change {,c}burst to 1600, or leaving them by default but no visible result. here is the latest tc -s -d class show dev eth0 class htb 1:101 parent 1:1 prio 0 rate 40Kbit ceil 40Kbit burst 1599b/8 mpu 0b cburst 1599b/8 mpu 0b quantum 512 level

Hello! I need to switch from htb2 to htb3, because of speed issues (for me, htb2 is unable to handle more then 100mbit duplex with ~550 classes), kernel profiling shows htb_dequeue_prio at 1st place with 3x isolation. So, I''ve moved from 2.4.19 to 2.4.25 kernel (hi-pac for classification/marking and htb3 for queueing), and traffic rate drop from 100 to 20mbit. What can be wrong? The

Hi, I have a server and ten clients in a Gigabit network. The server has 125mbps network bandwidth. I want that the server has 40Mbps bandwidth reserved for client 1 (IP 192.168.5.141), and the rest bandwidth is for all other clients. My script looks like this (I use IFB for incoming traffic): #!/bin/bash export TC="/sbin/tc" $TC qdisc add dev ifb0 root handle 1: htb default 30

Eric, I''ve attached the output from the command you requested below. I''m using kernel 2.6.17.12 and tc version ss060323. I''m have a nforce4 onboard giggabit controller using the forcedeth driver, if that makes a difference. Charlie, I''ll take a look at the Apache model for throttling, thanks. I was going for tc because was going to try to add additional

In this simple htb setup: # tc -s -d class ls dev eth0 class htb 1:1 root rate 300000bit ceil 300000bit burst 1749b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 1749b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b level 7 Sent 13171835 bytes 13169 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) rate 45848bit 10pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 lended: 5272 borrowed: 0 giants: 0 tokens: -84429 ctokens: -84429 class htb 1:2 parent 1:1 prio 0

What''s going on here? I''m spewing UDP traffic at this thing, and it is exceeding the ceil. Anyone know how to fix this? class htb 1:613 parent 1:5 leaf 613: prio 6 quantum 2560 rate 20480bit ceil 103360bit burst 15Kb/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 1728b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b level 0 Sent 16591370 bytes 4159 pkt (dropped 39449, overlimits 0 requeues 0) rate 412384bit 6pps backlog 0b

Hello, I use HTB with linux-2.4.20-ac1 and iptables-1.2.7a (pathced for IMQ). I configured one HTB qdisc on an IMQ device. This qdisc has some classes (about 5) and all of the classes has qdisc pfifo. I sometimes got out from my linux (while I was working) and I found in logs: Dec 4 11:49:27 core kernel: HTB init, kernel part version 3.7 Dec 4 11:49:28 core kernel: HTB: quantum of class

tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 12 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:10 rate 30kbps ceil 100kbps burst 2k tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:11 rate 10kbps ceil 100kbps burst 2k tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:12 rate 60kbps ceil 100kbps burst 2k tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 u32 match ip src 172.16.11.2 flowid 1:10 i login

Hi, I''m trying to perform some (what I consider) basic traffic shaping on our network utilising HTB. I have mostly reused the example on the lartc.org site: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 10 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100mbit burst 24k tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 50mbit ceil 80mbit burst 19k tc class add dev eth0

Sorry I pressed the wrong key and sent the message too early... > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Philipp Leusmann [mailto:philipp.leusmann@rwth-aachen.de] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. November 2006 12:53 > An: ''lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl'' > Betreff: Why did I need strange ceiling settings? > > Hi all, > > I recently installed traffic shaping on my

Hi all, I have been getting some strange results with HTB in kernel 2.6.11, and was wondering if anybody could give me some advice. Also, if someone could direct me to the changelog for the recent versions so I can see if it is worth upgrading? Anyway, the problem can best be summed up by looking at the output of ''tc -s -d class show dev eth0''. Some of the relevant results

Hi, What exactly are the "tokens"? I thought each token allowed the sending of one byte, that tokens are stored in a bucket that can hold a max of "burst" tokens, and that this bucket is filled with tokens at "rate". But theory does not seem to explain the "tc -s .." output in the examples below. And I can''t figure out why or how... #tc qdisc

Hi, I''m trying to configure QoS on my linux in the following manner: I have a main link with 64K, so I divided it in 3 classes of 18K, 14K and 9K with an excess (not used for classified traffic, just to be shared) of 23K. This excess should be distributed proportonally among the 3 classes, that is, the class that has more rate should borrow more bandwidth. What is happening is

With the below script, whenever I ping 10.0.16.10 (which matches the only filter I have), traffic still get''s sent to the default 1:2 class instead of 1:1 and I don''t know why... Any hints? (kernel 2.6.12, iproute2-2.6.15) tc qdisc del dev eth0 root > /dev/null 2>&1 tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1: root htb default 2 tc class add dev eth0 classid 1:1 parent 1: htb rate

Hi all. I''m going on my 3rd week trying to get a simple traffic shapping to work the right way :( !! My goal it to shape the traffic coming from one machine (pc1) to another machine (pc2) throught the "eth0" interface. My test configuration is as follows: PC1   IP: 192.168.105.237   Mask: 255.255.255.0   OS: Red Hat Linux Kernel 2.4.20-8   Rules:

Hi, I have a default class for my un-marked traffic (prio 5) and a prio 0 class for the important stuff, but I do not understand why my download traffic is duplicated in both. It work fine for my upload traffic (same setting except the red class but I have the same result if I create an esfq instead). Any comments/information will be appreciated. Below my config : tc commands from my scirpt :

Hi all! I''m working in a " _really_ end user simple", yet powerfull, flexible, scalable, GPL htb/htb-init front end, but now, in the "test fase" im facing an utlimate problem... Absoult minimalistic scenario: #Use a FIXEDFONT to read this #inet-ethx-|FIREWALL|-lan-ethx <-> |client_host_1| # #FIREWALL class(rate,ceil) at lan-ethx

We run a Hosting farm behind a bridge/iptables firewall setup running Gentoo with kernel 2.4.20-gentoo-r6, connected to a dual 15Mbps international internet pipe / , as this: Net Pipe --------- eth1 Bridge/Firewall eth0 -------- Internal Hosting Network lately we have been looking at htb to somehow control excessive usage from the users behind, but in our implementation there seems to be an

Hi All, I am using the script below to limit download rates and manage traffic for a certain IP address and testing the results using iperf. The rate that iperf reports is much higher than the rate I have configured for the HTB qdisc. It''s probably just some newbie trap that''s messing things up but I''m buggered if I can see it. The following script is run on the