similar to: HTB: quantum of class 100001 is small. Consider r2q change

hi. When I execute follow class setting qdisc 1:0 root htb default 2 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 10Mbit ceil 10Mbit parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 10kbit ceil 100Mbit HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change. <7>htb*g j=1014xxxxx HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change. <7>htb*g j=1014xxxxx HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change.

Hi, I''m getting this warning/error in /var/log/messages: May 26 18:21:05 mail kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10010 is small. Consider r2q change. Its a big deal? What should I do? Many thanks Oliver -- Oliver Schulze L. <oliver@samera.com.py>

Hi everyone, My HTB script is showing me those "r2q change" warnings. I read that I should test with r2q values to gain accuracy and stop the warnings but I made some tests with r2q and with burst and I still get the warnings. Any ideas on this issue will be very helpful. The script seems to be working as the bandwidth for the IPs is being shaped. The NIC works at 100mbit and the

Hi,lartc I used iproute-060110 with iptables1.3.4 on gentoo 2005r1 kernel 2.6.14-5. I find some error messages in system logfile: HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change. HTB: quantum of class 10010 is big. Consider r2q change. tcf_action_init_1: successfull police HTB: quantum of class 20001 is big. Consider r2q change. HTB: quantum of class 20020 is big. Consider

Hello, I have problems with htb. The problem is that when I download any file via shaper with htb, the traffic is very dinamic, it jumps, for example: if i have set ceil = 128kbit the results that it jumps from 112kbps to 144kbps or smth like that maybe its not very bad, but when the traffic drops down to 40kbps or less and then after 1 or 2 seconds jumps to 144kbps, its bad :-( and it is often.

Hi, My system always complain with the warning below : HTB: quantum of class 10099 is small. Consider r2q change. I simply do not understand why... Below my tc commands : /sbin/tc qdisc del dev eth0 root /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1 htb default 99 /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:2 htb rate 128Kbit /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:2 classid 1:10 htb rate 80Kbit

Hello Everybody, I am successful in throttling down the Bandwidth to 8kbit using HTB. Below that I get report to change r2q. I want to bring down the Leaf class Bandwidth to 3kbit. My script is as below: Tc Script to throttle down the Bandwidth to 8kbit based on MAC address and IP address tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1:0 htb default 30 r2q 1 tc class add

Dear list: I have a problem I cannot handle yet, and need to solve it as soon as possible. Would be very greatful with anybody who can help me. I have a 512/512 link to internet, that I want to share between several computers. I have eth0, with a public IP address, conected to Internet, and also, eth1, with a private IP address, for network with the surfing computers. I have a main class with

Hello Stef, I am working on a Bandwidth management project as part of my college curriculum.I am running TCNG 10-b but I am not able to classify packets based on MAC address using tcng, so I am running tc commands in /tcng/bin and they are working. But is there a way out to classify packets based on MAC address using TCNG. And, I am successful in throttling down the Bandwidth to 8kbit

Hi Stef, Sorry to write to you directly but my list membership is not working, I receive the archive but cant send to the list, cant delete myself because I don''t exist and can''t rejoin as they say I do exist, anyway hope you don''t mind Can you tell me what the difference between these two scripts is please. What I want to achieve is a high speed channel 1000kbit from

Hello, I have recently started looking at tc and iptables. I have an htb-queue with two classes 1:10 and 1:20 where 1:20 is the default. Then I use iptables to mark all packets I send out on eth1. I then filter marked packets into class 1:10. I expected all packets sent on eth1 to end up in class 1:10, but some packets still go to 1:20. Did I do it wrong? Thank you for any help. regards, David

tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 12 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:10 rate 30kbps ceil 100kbps burst 2k tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:11 rate 10kbps ceil 100kbps burst 2k tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:12 rate 60kbps ceil 100kbps burst 2k tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 u32 match ip src 172.16.11.2 flowid 1:10 i login

//Just to not forget eth0 is WAN and eth1 is LAN . The box is NATing my lan. I configured tcng to shape both download and upload and i got connection loss again. Maybe it is my script fault or it is something bad with packets marking . this is how i mark outgoing packets iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p tcp -s 192.168.1.23 -j MARK --set-mark $ip and this part of my script which is intented

Hey, I have such a script: tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1:0 htb default 21 r2q 2 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:0 classid 1:11 htb rate 100mbit tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:11 classid 1:21 htb rate 512kbit ceil 512kbit tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:11 classid 1:23 htb rate 1024kbit ceil 1024kbit tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:11 classid 1:25 htb rate 3072kbit

Hello. I have a 1024/256kbit ADSL and tried to shape outgoing traffic in order to improve latency. Here is my config. UPLOAD_RATE="256" UPRATE="$[4*$UPLOAD_RATE/5]" (a little smaller) UP70="$[7*$UPRATE/10]kbit" UP30="$[3*$UPRATE/10]kbit" UP20="$[2*$UPRATE/10]kbit" UPRATE="${UPRATE}kbit" IF="eth2" IPTABLES="iptables -t

With the below script, whenever I ping 10.0.16.10 (which matches the only filter I have), traffic still get''s sent to the default 1:2 class instead of 1:1 and I don''t know why... Any hints? (kernel 2.6.12, iproute2-2.6.15) tc qdisc del dev eth0 root > /dev/null 2>&1 tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1: root htb default 2 tc class add dev eth0 classid 1:1 parent 1: htb rate

Dear all, I''m new to traffic shapping although i have gone through marking and HTB queueing but i felt trouble in tc filter . I wonder if any one give me the hints about quantum or r2q. i guess quantum is used when two class has same prio and rate and want to give first priority between them and control the borrowing traffic. It should be set more than MTU too. But my

hello, i have a config that is with a large domain of rate, from 2kb to 40Mb and i have some problems with i don''t know how to deal with. so here are some classes 2 with q=1000, one with q 200000 and one with q=6400, all have been calculated by htb, in the code i speficien just rate,ceil, no quantum, no r2q, no bursts ($tc class add $IF_INT parent 1:2 classid 1:21 htb rate

----- Original Message ----- From: Michał Joachimiak To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 3:45 PM Subject: HTB - Really Big problem Hello everybody! Since week i dig lists and www and can''t find solution for my problem. I''m using HTB 3.13 kernel 2-4-25 smp iptables 1.2.9. I''ve got situation like this: LAN------Linux Box(routing only)------- Linux

Hello. I''m running linux box with Slackware 9.1 and compiled kernel 2.4.31 with "yes" to VLANs and "yes" to all QoS. On this box i have more ethernet interfaces: eth0 eth1 eth2 and so as more vlan interfaces: eth0.100 eth1.3 eth1.4 This is entrace(uplink) router to our whole network and my goal is to shape users on this machine. I want for this purpose use HTB so