similar to: New IMQ device implementation supporting device EOS

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "New IMQ device implementation supporting device EOS"

2004 Apr 01
1
ESFQ updates
Hi. On Mar 12, Corey Hickey posted here(http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2004q1/012038.html) an updated esfq patch for kernel 2.6. Has anyone backported it to kernel 2.4 ? Original esfq patch is not being kept in sync with kernel sfq, it seems. What people have been using with esfq and kernel 2.4.25, the original 2002 esfq patch ? Rubens
2004 Apr 01
1
wireless sta MAC NAT
Hi all, not sure this should be post here.... but i hope some one could help me. :> I''m newbie in the ebtables MAC address NAT and filtering stuff... i want to bridge a wireless client to a wired network, problem is AP would not accept frame not initiate from associated STA... so i guess i could solve it by natting mac with ebtables stuff.. question goes below.... 1.
2004 Oct 20
2
structure has no member named `imq_flags`
hi When compile kernel 2.6.8.1 with imq patch the following message is print: net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_IMQ.c: In function `imq_target'': net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_IMQ.c:19: error: structure has no member named `imq_flags'' what is that? when patch the kernel no problem message. the patch is linux-2.6.8-imq-3.diff i''m scan in google but nothing found Thanks
2008 Feb 25
3
eos on continued page
On 25-Feb-08, at 9:34 AM, xiphmont@xiph.org wrote: > I'd say both; libogg should ignore the incomplete packet or flag a > structural error, and the spec should be clarified. I guess libogg should return -1 if you try to ogg_stream_packetout() after the eos packet. The eos flag pretty clearly applies to the *page* not the packet, so I think how that gets translated into the
2008 Feb 25
2
eos on continued page
On 25-Feb-08, at 3:42 PM, Conrad Parker wrote: > ok. If the correct behaviour should be to ignore the incomplete > packet, that should also be clarified in the spec. Fair enough. What if no packet ends on the eos page? What about additional pages after the eos page? > I'd find it useful if it was not considered a structural error, as it > allows us to very simply chop files
2008 Feb 24
2
eos on continued page
Hi, I'm working on a new ogg file chopper (porting 'hogg chop' to C). These work pagewise, ie. they just copy the pages that are needed from the input to the output bitstream. I'm modifying the last page in the output bitstream so that it has the eos flag set. The last page is always one that has a granulepos set (that of the last packet finishing on that page). But let's say
2008 Feb 25
1
eos on continued page
On 26/02/2008, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hmm, good point. Maybe it requires a MUST specification... But then, it > would not be conformant to have a partial packet on the last page.... I'd definitely prefer that the recommendation to not have an incomplete packet on a page marked eos is a SHOULD not a MUST, so that eos pages don't need to be
2008 Feb 25
2
eos on continued page
>> There general idea with Ogg has been to distinguish non-fatal from >> fatal errors. libogg reports these by returning -1 while still >> returning the next valid bit of data. > > ok, would non-fatal translate into a SHOULD recommendation in the > spec, and fatal translate into a MUST? I assume there there are cases where a MUST isn't respected, yet libogg is
2004 Jan 04
4
IMQ problems :-(
Hi I have built a custom TMB Mandrake kernel (2.4.22) with IMQ and ESFQ support. I statically compiled both (mistake?) ESFQ is sorted and working fine (I have succesfully patched IPROUTE2). I have got to the stage where I can see the IMQ device as UP with ifconfig. I can use TC to add QDISCs to the IMQ device. However I just cannot sort out IPTABLES to actually redirect packets to the IMQ
2008 Oct 29
1
forcing eos on last theora packet (was Re: Theora 1.0 RC2)
2008/10/29 Romain Beauxis <toots at rastageeks.org>: > > I am currently implementing theora for our application. > In our model for generating ogg streams, we may want to stop > a stream while not providing a new YUV data buffer for encoding. > > Current API doesn't allow such thing, since the eos flag is set by the > packetout function only when the last_p parameter
2004 Jan 23
16
IMQ Stability
Hello all, I have been doing a lot of archive searching over the last week reading posts on IMQ and it''s apparent stability / instability. I have seen a number of posts about it not being maintained as well. Can anyone talk to me about IMQ''s stability in a heavy throughput environment (20 Mbps) and what was causing IMQ to fail if you know. Thanks, Mike
2004 Mar 02
2
imq or ingress+htb?
Todays quick question: Ive had problems with imq and getting my setup to work as planned. Im thinking that a better solution for shaping incoming traffic would be to put a little limit in the outer interface of the router box with ingress, and the shape traffic on the inner interface with htb. Would that be better than using imq? -- Patrick Petersen <lartc@schmakk.dk>
2005 May 24
6
Problem with marking packets...
Hello everyone... I have a little trouble and need some help :P How can I check on which interface the packet is going (eth0, eth1; I have two ISP and on eth3 little LAN), using to check it TC and IMQ? (HTB script) I tried to mark packets, but on chain POSTROUTING this does not work... Maybe because packets fall on IMQ before signing. I tried marking it on FORWARD but packets also
2004 Jun 23
7
http bandwidth control
Hi I''m newbie on this and i would appreciate some pointers on how to limit the http trafic to my users from my linux-gateway box. Thanx in advance -- Guillermo Gomez <ggomez@neotechgw.net> neotech _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
2004 Aug 12
0
Imq implimentation
hello all, i intend to impliment Jiri Fojtasek''s imq implimentation here http://hyperfighter.jinak.cz/qos/ on my Linux shaper for production use,I will like to ask if people have implimented it and find it stable and useful as stated in the site. My bandwidth manager will have 3 interfaces , eth0 -internet(live ip, bridged with eth1), eth1(live ip bridged w eth0), eth2 -lan(local
2004 Jun 24
5
Frottle + Bridge + IMQ
Hi, I''m trying to configure IMQ to work on the same machine with frottle (http://frottle.sourceforge.net). The problem is both feed themselves packets through netfilter queueing mechanism, but currently there can only be one netfilter queue per protocol family. To explain why I need IMQ in the first place I have to explain what frottle does. It is a deamon that tweaks the behaviour of a
2002 May 03
2
Some questions concerning IPtables (& IMQ/SFQ)
Hi there! Some questions I couldn''t find an answer for: IPtables: - Is it possible to filter those ACK-packets (to eleminate problems with ADSL-connections) with IPtables? It wasn''t possible with IPchains, so u32 had to be used. Now there is this nice little --tcp-flags option. But I just don''t know if this is all I need. The u32 was checking for packetsize too. So if
2004 Sep 08
3
Help! VLAN tagged traffic not shaping :-(
Hello, I have a linux box sitting between (and bridging/firewalling) 2 LAN segments. I''m using Bridge/Netfilter/IMQ/tc(htb) to control (shape) mail/web traffic that traverses the 2 networks. The networks also have some VLAN tagged traffic flying around. My linux box behaves OK with VLAN traffic except that the shaping doesn''t seem to work. Normal http shapes alright but as soon
2008 Feb 25
0
eos on continued page
On 26/02/2008, Ralph Giles <giles@xiph.org> wrote: > On 25-Feb-08, at 3:42 PM, Conrad Parker wrote: > > > ok. If the correct behaviour should be to ignore the incomplete > > packet, that should also be clarified in the spec. > > > Fair enough. What if no packet ends on the eos page? What about > additional pages after the eos page? good point, they've
2004 Apr 24
9
newbie: TC[NG] with (256kbit/s down and 768kbit/s up) on a router
Hi all, this is really not really very easy to understand, or, to get in. Well, I''ve the following configuration on the router box: LAN - interface: eth0 - network: 192.168.2.5/24 - bandwidth: 100Mbit/s INET interface - interface: ppp0 - network: .dynamic.ip./0 - bandwidth: DOWN=1536kbit/s and UP=256kbit/s the LAN interface is to serve 6 other clients with internet and