similar to: r2q

Hi everyone, My HTB script is showing me those "r2q change" warnings. I read that I should test with r2q values to gain accuracy and stop the warnings but I made some tests with r2q and with burst and I still get the warnings. Any ideas on this issue will be very helpful. The script seems to be working as the bandwidth for the IPs is being shaped. The NIC works at 100mbit and the

Hello again, I need to change the R2Q for my script, as setting the quantum manually for each class is painful. Can you tell me exactly where to set R2Q = x? I get syntax errors all the time. Should it be specified for each class? I do not know where to place this setting... Thanks in advance, Vlad Mihai _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list /

Hi, I''m getting this warning/error in /var/log/messages: May 26 18:21:05 mail kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10010 is small. Consider r2q change. Its a big deal? What should I do? Many thanks Oliver -- Oliver Schulze L. <oliver@samera.com.py>

hi. When I execute follow class setting qdisc 1:0 root htb default 2 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 10Mbit ceil 10Mbit parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 10kbit ceil 100Mbit HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change. <7>htb*g j=1014xxxxx HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change. <7>htb*g j=1014xxxxx HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change.

Salut lartc (lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl), 18:12:52 kernel HTB init, kernel part version 3.10 18:12:52 kernel HTB: quantum of class 100001 is small. Consider r2q change. 18:12:52 kernel HTB: quantum of class 100002 is small. Consider r2q change. 18:12:52 kernel HTB: quantum of class 100003 is small. Consider r2q change. 18:12:52 kernel HTB: quantum of class 100004 is small. Consider r2q change.

Hello, I''ve installed htb3 on my simple config (htb + sfq) . Something is now complaining that quantum is too small and suggest that r2q be changed. There seems to be no documentation on this. Ideas anyone? Regards John

Hello Everybody, I am successful in throttling down the Bandwidth to 8kbit using HTB. Below that I get report to change r2q. I want to bring down the Leaf class Bandwidth to 3kbit. My script is as below: Tc Script to throttle down the Bandwidth to 8kbit based on MAC address and IP address tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1:0 htb default 30 r2q 1 tc class add

Hi, I''m looking for a script in order to do traffic control on a ciber cafe LAN, with linux router. Ciber has about 40 hosts, and I haven''t much bandwidth (512kbit). Also, I''ve a squid cache and it works very good! I''ve found Jim QoS script, and FairNat. Which is more suitable for me ? Jim QoS ? FairNat ? other ? If I put FairNat, I would need ZPH patch

My gateway is showing these messages: htb*g j=4929 htb*r7 m=0 htb*r6 m=0 htb*r5 m=0 htb*r4 m=0 htb*r3 m=0 htb*r2 m=0 htb*r1 m=0 htb*r0 m=0 HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change. What does it means ? Thanks, Luciano Lima _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO:

Hi,lartc I used iproute-060110 with iptables1.3.4 on gentoo 2005r1 kernel 2.6.14-5. I find some error messages in system logfile: HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change. HTB: quantum of class 10010 is big. Consider r2q change. tcf_action_init_1: successfull police HTB: quantum of class 20001 is big. Consider r2q change. HTB: quantum of class 20020 is big. Consider

Hi, My system always complain with the warning below : HTB: quantum of class 10099 is small. Consider r2q change. I simply do not understand why... Below my tc commands : /sbin/tc qdisc del dev eth0 root /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1 htb default 99 /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:2 htb rate 128Kbit /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:2 classid 1:10 htb rate 80Kbit

hola listeros! existe algun script webScript, proyecto, herramienta o lo que sea, que sirva para medir el trafico total de una lan, como para hacer reportes mensuales por host ? necesito hacer algo asi: host Trafico/mes ----------------------------- 192.168.1.x1 xxxxx Bytes 192.168.1.x2 xxxxx Bytes 192.168.1.x3 xxxxx Bytes 192.168.1.x4 xxxxx Bytes ese seria un reporte a efectuar el ultimo

Hi, I have a Debian based NAT router. How can I manage upstream egress bandwidth based on the LAN ipadress in the network below? My goal is that host1 get a minumum of 10Mbit up/down and host2 gets a minimum of 90Mbit up/down, both max 100Mbit up/down? targethost 172.16.255.254 | | 172.16.0.1 natrouter

On 2/19/07, Salatiel Filho <salatiel.filho@gmail.com> wrote: > Well , thanks to imq all my client machines are now shaped and > everything is great ... > But now i have a doubt , is there a way to shape the traffic that goes > to the route [doing a wget from the router for example ]? > > > I have a PREROUTING IMQ0 and a POSTROUTING IMQ1 , everything is > working like

Hello, I have problems with htb. The problem is that when I download any file via shaper with htb, the traffic is very dinamic, it jumps, for example: if i have set ceil = 128kbit the results that it jumps from 112kbps to 144kbps or smth like that maybe its not very bad, but when the traffic drops down to 40kbps or less and then after 1 or 2 seconds jumps to 144kbps, its bad :-( and it is often.

imq and htb are used to control traffic. #tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle 1: htb default 0 #tc class add dev $IMQDEV parent 1: classid 1:1 htb \ rate 10000kbps ceil 10000kbps burst 15k I get the following messages: HTB quantum of class 1001 is big.consider r2q change <7>htb*g j=4129006 what is the reasonable range of rate ,or I have to set which parameter to set rate up to 10M(even

How can i redirect all traffic that not come from port 80 to a flow ? i was thing about some like tc filter add dev imq1 parent 1: protocol ip prio 7 u32 match ip sport !80 ...... But this not work. Another doubt, if i have two rules that intersects , for example , one filter with u32 match ip src 10.10.10.10 flowid 1:10 and other with u32 match sport 80 0xffff flowid 1:11 , which one will

Hi, im using this script to shape traffic as I want..i get this log on the kernel Log: HTB: quantum of class 10020 is big. Consider r2q change. HTB init, kernel part version 3.13 HTB init, kernel part version 3.13 How worryed should I be :) ??? Thanks people!? #!/bin/bash -x fast_mark=1 ultra_fast_mark=2 slow_mark=3 interfaz_externa="eth1"

//Just to not forget eth0 is WAN and eth1 is LAN . The box is NATing my lan. I configured tcng to shape both download and upload and i got connection loss again. Maybe it is my script fault or it is something bad with packets marking . this is how i mark outgoing packets iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p tcp -s 192.168.1.23 -j MARK --set-mark $ip and this part of my script which is intented

Hi ; MY script: tc-htb3 qdisc del dev eth2 root ipchains -F tc-htb3 qdisc add dev eth2 root handle 10: htb default 20 r2q 40 tc-htb3 class add dev eth2 parent 10: classid 10:1 htb rate 50Mbit burst 2000 tc-htb3 class add dev eth2 parent 10:1 classid 10:100 htb rate 12mbit ceil 50mbit prio 1 tc-htb3 class add dev eth2 parent 10:1 classid 10:20 htb rate 38mbit ceil 50Mbit prio 8 ipchains