similar to: Unit test preperation with migrations

http://dev.rubyonrails.com/changeset/856 looks to me like it''s not going to work, since there''s no way of specifying a password to pg_dump/dropdb/createdb. If you set PGPASSWORD in your environment it might work, but that''s not documented anywhere and isn''t done automatically in the Rakefile. See http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.ruby.rails/3693 for

hey guys, I''m having a problem here, I have a pc in my house that I use as a db server (postgresql). I have the pr-postgresql gem running and it works very well But when I try to "rake spec" I get these 2 errors C:/ruby/bin/rake: No such file or directory - dropdb -U "coleira" coleira_test C:/ruby/bin/rake: No such file or directory - createdb -E unicode -U

Hi I am using postgres And I have already development database..When I give rake db:test:prepare it gives sh: dropdb: command not found sh: createdb: command not found But how ever test db is created Same happens also when rake db:test:clone I would like to know why I am getting this message Thanks in advance Sijo -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, I get errors doing this: 1) createdb myapp_test 2) rake db:test:clone_structure 3) rake test:units rake aborted! PGError: ERROR: relation "matches" already exists I''m using the :sql schema format because there are some problems with postgres and the :ruby schema format config.active_record.schema_format = :sql It seems rake test:units is trying to create the tables

Hi all. I am using PostgreSQL in my current project and I have couple of questions on this topic. Previously I have used 3 databases for project. i.e. megaproject_development, megaproject_test and megaproject_development. But I don''t like this variant because of ''rake dump_db_structure'' writes a lot of PostgreSQL specific data for structure file (operators, functions,

TDD, SVN and migrations seem to be a natural combination for model development: create a test, add the column with a migration, write the code, and check it all in when you''re done. The trouble is that this ends up creating one migration per field. I guess it''s not horrible in and of itself, but it does have a code smell to it. Has anyone come up with a different way of doing

Hi Trying to get rcov going (has been working), but with the following context and specs it fails. context ''/account POST with invalid attendee'' do controller_name :account setup do Attendee.stub!(:create!).and_raise(ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid.new( Attendee.new)) end specify ''should raise on create'' do Attendee.should_receive(:create!).with({

I''m writing some code that accesses some lagacy database on PostgreSQL. Since the old database had some really ughly and weird naming conventions (like CamelCase). To work around this I created a second schema (named rails) in the same database and gave the tables and fields some rails-friendly names. The database user that Rails uses has its search_path set to the rails schema. That way

Folks, I don''t like that I have to grant CREATEDB rights to the test user to get testing working smoothly with Postgres. What is the philosophical reason that Rails wants to drop and recreate databases during the testing? It would seem to me that "pg_dump -c" (the "clean" dump option, similar to mysqldump''s --add-drop-tables ) would suffice when

Signed-off-by: Joey Boggs <jboggs at redhat.com> --- installer/modules/ovirt/manifests/freeipa.pp | 8 ++++---- installer/modules/ovirt/manifests/postgres.pp | 12 ++++++------ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/installer/modules/ovirt/manifests/freeipa.pp b/installer/modules/ovirt/manifests/freeipa.pp index e5de852..f91cd43 100644 ---

Hi everyone. I''m having a bit of a problem with an application I''m currently developing with Rails 1.2.3 and PostgreSQL, attempting to use test-first development. Here''s the scenario: * I have the usual three databases, with migrations. Testing has been working beautifully. * I need to store geographic data, so I add PostGIS to all three databases (along with

I''ve created several different Rails applications but I''m running into the same trouble with each one. Lets say I create an app called Test. I type ''rails test'' and it generates the directory for me. Now I edit my database.yml file. Then I create a database with Postgresql by typing createdb test. Now I go into Postgresql by typing ''psql

As part of a project to clarify what behaviour of C implementations is actually relied upon in modern practice, and what behaviour is guaranteed by current mainstream implementations, we recently distributed a survey of 15 questions about C, https://goo.gl/AZXH3S. We were asking what C is in current mainstream practice: the behaviour that programmers assume they can rely on, the behaviour

I am currently going through the process of installing/configuring an iSCSI target and cannot find a good write up on how to prepare the disks on the server. I would like to mirror the two disks and present them to the client. Mirroring isn't the question, its how I go about it is the problem. When I partitioned the two drives and mirrored them together, then presented them to the client,

Hi all, I need to install cerberus inside my rails app''s public directory... I agree that the best method would be to put the whole php app in it''s own subdomain, but for now (i''m just testing) that''s not possible... What would be the way to do that? thanks! rolando.- -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

My reading of the kernel.src.rpm doesn't indicate that Severn has ext3 htree patches. Stephen, were there any issues seen during Cerberus testing ? Regards, Yusuf -- Yusuf Goolamabbas yusufg@outblaze.com

Hello, Running dovecot 1.1.6 on centOS 5 and RHEL 5. With the settings: pop3_lock_session = yes mail_privileged_group = mail mail_location = mbox:~/:INBOX=/var/spool/mail/%u mbox_read_locks = fcntl mbox_write_locks = dotlock fcntl and /var/spool/mail permissions: drwxrwx--x 2 root mail 4096 Nov 19 10:16 mail/ Trying to connect via POP3 results in this error: --- Nov 19 09:31:01

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sean Silva" <chisophugis at gmail.com> > To: "Peter Sewell" <Peter.Sewell at cl.cam.ac.uk> > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 4:53:30 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] C as used/implemented in practice: analysis of responses > > > > All of these seem to fall into the pattern of

I have set up puppet to create a facts.yaml file for mcollective using the following line: content => inline_template("<%= scope.to_hash.reject { |k,v| k.to_s =~ /(uptime.*|timestamp|.*free|macaddress.*|ipaddress)/ }.to_yaml %>"), However, it is creating a lot of unnecessary changes by reordering the facts in the yaml output as you can see in the diff output between to

At useR 2006 I mentioned that it would be nice to have a way to specify binomial links that involved free parameters and described some experience with a Gosset link involving a free degrees of freedom parameter, and a Tukey-lambda link with two free parameters. My implementation of this involved some rather kludgey modifications of binomial, make.link and glm that (essentially) added a