similar to: Non-traditional Failover Query

Hello guys I don''t know if this thing has been posted before (if it was , please forgive me). I have 7 computers at home and I want all of them to have access to the internet. In order to do that , I set up a linux router (2 network cards) as a usual router (eth0 : 82.77.69.75 - internet connection ; eth1 : 192.168.10.1 - local network) . The other computers have ips ranging from

Hi all I''m new in this list and i hope to lear and to help if possible. But firt i need help :-( I have this messege in my syslog when my classes and qdiscs goes down. Can any one know what does it mean? Thnx in advance. Yannick Arrimadas Bot Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel: HTB init, kernel part version 3.17 Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel: Unable to handle kernel paging

OK - this is starting to get frustrating... Are there any known issues with 2.6.9 and traffic shaping? I am using 2.6.9 with geoip 20041115, and get odd oopses. The following script oopses my box: ----------------------------------------------------- #!/bin/sh -x IFOUT=''eth1'' IFIN=''eth0'' TC=''/sbin/tc''

Hi, I am trying to categorize the network traffic and to send it out across two different providers. For this I mark the packets in the firewall (in the PREROUTING chain of table mangle), and then use another routing table for the marked packets, which has a different gateway from the main routing table. Basicaly I am following the cookbook example in this page:

Hi all, I''m having some problems setting up qdiscs on a bridge.The config looks a little like this: ifconfig ifb0 up # Bring up the IFB for this bridge. tc qdisc add dev eth2 ingress tc qdisc add dev eth3 ingress tc qdisc add dev ifb0 root handle 1:0 cbq bandwidth 100Mbit avpkt 1000 cell 8 # Raw qdiscs on each bridge port tc qdisc add dev eth2 root handle 1:0 cbq bandwidth

Howdy all, I posted this message to the netfilter mailing-list and didn''t get much response. I apologize if anyone here is getting this for a second time. Anyway, I recently migrated my firewall from a FreeBSD box running ipfilter, ipnat and dummynet to a Gentoo Linux box running netfilter and tc. I have to admit that I''m having problems visualizing tc in my head. So, I was

Hello i have some problems on 2.6.14 kernel dummy and iproute :) i have server with 2 nics : eth0 <> inet eth1 <> lan dummy0 (i want to shape incoming traffic from lan machine on this interface) my config: tc qdisc del dev dummy0 root tc qdisc add dev dummy0 root handle 1: htb tc class add dev dummy0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100kbit ceil 100kbit tc class add dev dummy0

Hi all, I am running Slackware 10.1 with Kernel 2.6.14.3 includes iptables 1.3.4 with layer 7 My network diagram below: - INTERNET --- LINUX_ROUTER_FW --- PCs Below is my simple iptables script: - echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -m layer7 --l7proto applejuice -j MARK --set-mark 1 iptables -t

Hello, list members, can i limit pps rate with linux? How? -m limit does not fit, as i understood: it can help with low rates only (is that true? any suggestions?) Thank you, -- _,-=._ /|_/| `-.} `=._,.-=-._., @ @._, `._ _,-. ) _,.-'' ` G.m-"^m`m'' Dmytro O. Redchuk

Hello, I am using a simple script, which is based on prio. The point is, that it is not possible to use htb on wifi networks, so I thought that prio will work fine, but it does almost nothing. All I wanted was to make the important packets like icmp, games, VoIP,... to go first, and to slow the things like FTP data transfer, etc. When I use $TC -s qdisc show dev ${IFACE}, I see, that the

Hello, Could someone experienced suggest good solution for failover advanced router ? The router for which I need redundancy is quite complex: 1) has 5 interfaces 2) uses the same network and the other network IP aliases on some interfaces 3) uses bunch of policy routing rules 4) uses proxyarp feature on some interfaces 5) uses complex iptables setup [propably not important in this

I''m still trying to figure out this problem, I appreciate any suggestions... What I''d like to do is have a second default gateway path that never gets taken unless the first one goes into the "dead" state. I have installed Julian''s patch and it works great for loadballanced connections using the nexthop code, but I would like to setup the second default route

Hi Guys, I would just like to have advice and pointers of the best way would be, Someting like BGP or OSPF? I have 2 internet connections at diffrent locations. let say connection A and B 1.) router A has a fast internet connection and a seperate interface for clients using /lan/pppoe/ipsec etc and another ethernet interface going to router B 2.) router B has similiar setup as router A and

Hi all, I am wondering if anyone can help me to resolve a problem. I am trying to use tc command in linux to drop udp packets of specific diffserv value. I am able set diffserv value successfully in the udp packet using command:- [root@scotch src]#iptables --table mangle --append OUTPUT \ --out-interface eth0 --protocol udp --source-port 5060 \ --jump DSCP --set-dscp 8 but i am not able to

I''d like to setup a box with 2 NICs as a firewall which will also rate limits outbound traffic. What happens when/if that box hangs or is rebooted? I''d like a solution that when there is a failure, traffic can still go through the box even though the firewall and rate limiting functions will no longer be in effect. I believe that this is "failing closed" but have

Hi all iam trying to deploy loadbalance and failover My setup description --Fedora Core 4 --Linux 2.6.12.3 #1 SMP Mon Jul 25 22:37:34 IST 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux --tc utility, iproute2-ss050314 --ip utility, iproute2-ss050314 --iptables v1.3.0 And i had deployed Following configuration #table main with priority 50, the highest one ip rule add prio 50 table main #table 201 ip rule add

Hello, Is there a way to route p2p traffic on a separate ISP connection, just as you would choose a separate connection for http traffic? I tried all sorts of setups based on: http://www.braindump.dk/en/wiki/?wikipage=PolicyRouting but with no luck. Please help :) (ipp2p is up and running) _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

here''s the setup (two dsl - same provider) +-----> link1 LAN----- linux box --| |----------internet +-----> link2 the setup is ok in terms of the failover requirement. the other link takes over when one is down. however, there is a very noticeable lag when both lines are up. i''ve tried changing

hello all, previously i had some problems setting up a load balancing network, but now after re-applying the julian patch, it works good, but my doubt is that if we have statically provided and IP Rule for some network to use some particular gateway like follows, ip rule add prio 203 from 192.168.1.0/24 table 203 ip route add default via 203.88.135.213 dev eth1 src 203.88.135.212 proto static

Hi There, I am also trying to do the same for my network. I have two links from different ISPs and I want to configure a failover and load balancing Linux router. I am facing same problem here, that how to detect link failure and let Linux box switch the gateway. I know it works when the first gateway is physically down and not reachable. But what to do if my link is up but there is problem