similar to: 2 isp''s problem

sorry, i''m confuse where to post my problem.. i was post to shorewall-users, but must read to support.html this''s my problem ----------- i have squid running on DMZ zone and my network using ProxyARP on eth1 and eth2 mylinuxbox slackware 9.2 my network can access to internet normal, but can''t redirect to squid server from firewall. sometimes my network can connect

Hi list, i have the following situ 2 ISP's one internal network. Load Balancing between the ISP's (with mpath) I want to route speciffic traffic over only one of the ISP's more specifficaly the ICQ traffic i have the following configs iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 5190 -j MARK --set-mark 0x5190 ip ru a from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx prio 201 t isp_rules1 ip ru a fwmark

hi all, i have this situation: isp1 | dmz ----- FW linux ----- isp2 |----------------------------------- vpn concentrator ----- various ipsec lan-2-lan | LAN In lan i have "pc zone" and "server zone", same network. Dmz and server zone browse internet through isp1, lan use isp2, and remote

[ I hope this isn''t a dupe. Evolution crashed on my last send and I see nothing in my logs that leads me to believe the mail made it out before the crash ] Well, it probably is working. I''m probably just misunderstanding something. Given routing rules that look like this: 0: from all lookup local 10000: from all fwmark 0x40 lookup CGCO 10001: from all fwmark 0x80

I made a script to test if in a moultiple gateway setup all default connection are up, regardless of the fact that that gateway is the default gw. Suppose adsl1 and adsl2 are present, and all traffic goes by default to adsl1, and you want to test if adsl2 is ok. 1. I use mangles from iptables to mark icmp packets to some test machines 2. I set up a routing table for each adsl 3. I use

I have a gentoo 2.6.14 box with 4 nics, LAN/DMZ/PUB1/PUB2 LAN and DMZ have a 1918 /22 each, PUB1 and PUB2 have a /29 each of which 5 ips are assigned. Using the mangle table, I give all packets a mark (according to local policies) in the range 1-10. Using ip rule, i pass marks 1-5 through the pub1 route table, and marks 6-10 through the pub2 routing table. Using the nat table, I SNAT to one

Hi, I have established two connections to the same ISP. After that ip route list showed this: 195.14.247.94 dev ppp0 proto kernel scope link src 81.173.141.207 195.14.247.94 dev ppp1 proto kernel scope link src 81.173.237.84 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.1 default via 195.14.247.94 dev ppp0 I want 192.168.0.2 to connect to the internet by ppp1 and all

On Dec 12, 2013, at 04:25 , Gasiunas, Vaidas <vaidas.gasiunas at sap.com> wrote: > To address these requirements we have developed a set of patches improving performance and malfunction safety of certain compiler passes and would be interested in contributing them at some point. Before proposing concrete changes, we would like to know what the general interest is with respect to making

Hello lartc maintainers and users! I have a router with two NICs. One NIC is connected to the Internet and the other to my internal LAN. I made a script for priorizing interactive traffic. The script matches TOS Minimize-Delay for priorizing interactive trafic, and fwmark for metropolitan packets. I have two root classes (simulating two circuits) : 1:1 for internet and 1:3 for metropolitan.

Hi Andy, > I would think you could use a simple allocation scheme on the host side and then allocate a single block (or perhaps one code block and one data block) in the target process to receive everything, since everything is loaded on the host before you need to copy it to the target process. But perhaps I'm missing something regarding your particular scenario. > In any event,

hi for those who was fallowing this topic I can say that IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED must be disabled! After few tests I''m quite sure that this was cousing my problems. Now I''m using 2.5.15 kernel without patch of Julian Anastasov and load-balancing is working. lartc split-access how to and http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt now both are working fine Now I will try to use fwmark

I have a working router (thanks to Julian''s patches and the threads on this site) load balancing over Dual ISP''s. Links for the curious (see router setup below as well) - Necessary Patches - http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/ How to Patch (I use Debian Sarge and downloaded the latest source from kernel.org) - http://www.desktop-linux.net/debkernel.htm Necessary Reading -

Could someone please explain what I should do to rectify this message that I get on trying to run a simple application in wine. ( Notepd works fine) ----------------------------------------------------- mcop warning: user defined signal handler found for SIG_PIPE, overriding fixme:commctrl:InitCommonControlsEx Unknown class! dwICC=0x8000 XIO: fatal IO error 2 (Success) on X server

Hi guys Can anyone give me any reason why BX should fail - tryig to install FreeBSD 4.7 on an old machine from CDROM. The machine loads a very old version of FreeBSD from hard drive (password long forgotten) so it seems to be running OK - it auto loads X windows - so the nachine seems to be running fine. Here is the output that I do not understand ;-( : int=00000000 err=00000000 efl=00030287

I configured multiple isp (actually only multiple gw) according http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html. Now NAT (Internet) seems to work, both external interfaces work ( I didnt configure load balancing because I dont need it). However I have problem that I can not ping from NAT to public ip of my Linux box. Problem is that I can not connect from 192.168.1.0/24 network to services

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Philipp Becker" <philipp.becker at sap.com> > To: "Philip Reames" <listmail at philipreames.com>, "LLVM Dev" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 6:55:59 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Making LLVM safer in out-of-memory situations > > Hi Philip, > > Thanks for the

On 12/12/13 4:25 AM, Gasiunas, Vaidas wrote: > Hello, > > Philipp Becker and me, Vaidas Gasiunas, are developers at SAP and part of a team developing a C-like domain-specific language for the SAP HANA in-memory database. We use LLVM as a backend to translate our language to native code, primarily on x86-64 platforms. Our programs are created dynamically, compiled and optimized in a

I have two ISP connections, and am having some issues. I can connect to any services on the firewall, like the smtp gateway, but anything on the internal server only works from one connection. The lartc guide has a good example for what to do for services on the box, but leaves it open for how to handle services on an internal host. I''ve tried using iptables to mark the packets

hi I have trying to remove the extra rules from my routing tables, however with no luck Also I want to know these duplicate entries have an effect on packets going routed? I have this overwhelming rules lists from my predessor who added the "ip rule add fwmark" entries in firewall script, and on each run of firewall script its creates an extra entry in routing table. Now what I want to

I''m having trouble routing on high fwmarks, I want to use a lot of different marks for 2 routes so that I can QoS based on the marks ip rule looks like this: 0: from all lookup local 32751: from all fwmark 31 lookup dslout 32752: from all fwmark 30 lookup dslout 32753: from all fwmark 29 lookup dslout 32754: from all fwmark 28 lookup dslout 32755: from