similar to: Help with encryption

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2560 Bug ID: 2560 Summary: sshd: Description of hashed known_hosts file does not make sense and format is outdated Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

Hello, I'm trying to build a valid public ssh v2 RSA key from a java application but I have some problems understanding how the two numbers (e and n) are base64 encoded into ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub or ~/.ssh/authorized_keys2 file. My question is what exactly is encoded into the base64 string? For example for this public key: ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAABIwAAAQEA6p76zG+8aOkFZT1y4O+Y7n

Scenario: I have a main website. I want to allow other people with web servers to use rsync to synchronize mirror copies of my website. When the mirror website uses rsync to connect to the server, how can it be sure that the server is not an IP spoofing impostor that is serving up altered files?

Hello, part of a usual OpenSSH installation are quite some files containing key material, like private keys (id_rsa, id_dsa, id_ecdsa) and the corresponding public keys (id_rsa.pub, id_dsa.pub, id_ecdsa.pub). Inspired by a recent question on Stack Overflow [1], I had a look at the OpenSSH documentation to see what format these key files have. The sshd man page [2] contains some paragraphs about

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote: > > On Mar 24, 2015, at 5:09 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > > It's not a big deal, but it always annoyed me a bit when I hit it, so > I'll bring it up here. > > > > LLD represents an alignment X as log2(X) in some places and just X in > other places.

Is there a good reason why known_hosts stores the address of the server but not the port? This is annoying when one host is running more than one instance of openssh with different ports and different keys, or (less tractably) when a NAT in front of multiple hosts multiplexes which host is connected to by port number. I see no immediate security implication in fixing this, but am I missing

I guess I'm talking about atoms. Do we have notion of section in LLD? On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 3/24/2015 7:51 PM, Rui Ueyama wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote: >> >> On Mar 24, 2015, at 5:09 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com>

Hello subscribers, I have a very strange question regarding SSL setup on gluster storage. I have create a common CA and sign certificate for my gluster nodes, placed host certificate, key and common CA certificate into /etc/ssl/, create a file called secure-access into /var/lib/glusterd/ Then, I start glusterd on all nodes, system work fine, I see with peer status all of my nodes. No problem.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1158 Summary: Setting the environment in authorized_keys does not work Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.9p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1853 Summary: sshd doesn't seem to be able to auth a user using an rsa key of 20000 bit Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.7p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo:

I am a statistician and I come up to an interesting problem in cryptography. I would like to use R since there are some statistical procedures that I need to use. However, I run into a problem when using the modulus operator %%. I am using R 2.2.1 and when I calculate modulus for large numbers (that I need with my problem) R gives me warnings. For instance if one does: a=1:40; 8^a %% 41 one

I have an application i''m installing on my application server. I''ve been using WEBrick and for now i''d like to just keep using it working in prototype development mode. This works fine on my development machine using both http and https, where the host is ''localhost'' (ports 3000,3001). It also works fine on the application server http port 3000. The

I'm trying to do a modulus operator in R-1.2.2 on Windows -- specific version: R : Copyright 2001, The R Development Core Team Version 1.2.2 Patched (2001-03-22) Here's what the R language manual says: "R contains a number of operators. They are listed in the table below. [snip] % Modulus, binary" Here's what happens on the R console: > records <- 100000 >

It's not a big deal, but it always annoyed me a bit when I hit it, so I'll bring it up here. LLD represents an alignment X as log2(X) in some places and just X in other places. It's a bit confusing. Because I always think alignments in my mind in terms of 1, 2, 4, 8, ..., instead of 2^1, 2^2, 2^3, ..., I'd like to propose to always use real values. Any objections? --------------

Hi, This might be me missing something painfully obvious but why does the cube root of the following produce an NaN? > (-4)^(1/3) [1] NaN > As we can see: > (-1.587401)^3 [1] -4 Thanks! Greg

Dear R Helpers, I am trying to extract the modulus from divisions by a sequence of fractions. I noticed that %% seems to behave inconsistently (to my untutored eye), thus: > 0.1%%0.1 [1] 0 > 0.2%%0.1 [1] 0 > 0.3%%0.1 [1] 0.1 > 0.4%%0.1 [1] 0 > 0.5%%0.1 [1] 0.1 > 0.6%%0.1 [1] 0.1 > 0.7%%0.1 [1] 0.1 > 0.8%%0.1 [1] 0 > 0.9%%0.1 The modulus for 0.1, 0.2, 0.4 and 0.8 is

This patch supplies software IEEE floating point support. The comment from the patch reproduced below says all there is to say. This patch contains the prior "cleanup" patch; please don't apply that one. Please let me know of any bugs. It is tested reasonably well, but until I put together random tests it's hard to have 100% confidence. Neil. /* A self-contained host- and

## the following is a dream: add some sugar syntax to allow for contracts with teeth (in and out checking) > is.positive <- function(x) (all(x>0)) > exponentiate <- function( x ::is.data.frame , exponent ::is.numeric is.positive) :: is.vector is.numeric { x$base :: is.positive ## error also if base does not exist in x; may need some special IQ x$base^exponent }

Hi, OpenSSH 6.9 is almost ready for release, so we would appreciate testing on as many platforms and systems as possible. This release contains some substantial new features and a number of bugfixes. Snapshot releases for portable OpenSSH are available from http://www.mindrot.org/openssh_snap/ The OpenBSD version is available in CVS HEAD: http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html Portable OpenSSH is

Things are going along well, but there is one remaining area of confusion...."units". I understand exponents now...it's basically how you pass decimal values. That's easy enough. But "units"....in other words, I have a voltage I want to put in a report. If I include in the report descriptor the fact that it is actually a voltage, with units of "volts",