similar to: straight join in rails

Hey all, I''d really appreciate some eyes on https://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994-ruby-on-rails/tickets/5845-activerecord-3-eager-loading-fail#ticket-5845-19. There''s a small issue in Rails 3 eager loading, and this ticket has an accompanying patch. Sssociations that show up twice in a Relation chain like: Article.includes(:comments).includes(:comments =>

Hi! I just started using RSpec and have some question that I couldn''t find answers to. If I have a result that can have two valid values, is there a better way of writing the following assertion? [value1,value2].should_include actual Is there a more elegant way of performing should_satisfy on a collection, for example I currently use something like collection.each {|x|

Hi! It seems that migration doesn''t use single transcation to execute the needed migrations for the database upgrade, so if I have database at version 5, and I wrote some migrations 6..10, and error occurs while executing migration 7, the database stays in state 6? I also think that migration taks could use some more verbosity, for example if migration fails, there''s no

Hi! Is there an option that I could provide to the spec runner that would make it stop after it encounters the first spec that fails? Esad

Hi! The following example doesn''t work for me: http://pastie.caboo.se/41732 However, if the call to msg() happens in the specify block after the expecation and not in the setup, it will pass. Why is this? I thought the setup method was there to actually ''construct'' the context and the specifications are some kind of "postconditions" that only need to be

Hi! I''m using Migration to define my database schema and these "ALTER TABLE t ADD FOREIGN KEY..." look really ugly - that''s why I wanted to ask it would be possible to simply add add_foreign_key method to ActiveRecord? Are there any reasons this isn''t yet implemented? Greetings, Esad -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi! Is there a nicer way of writing File.should be_exist(''filename'')? File.should exist(''foo'') throws NoMethodError in ''specification'' undefined method `exist'' for #<#<Class:0x3ec1c30>:0x3ebc308> (I''m using rspec from the trunk) Esad

Hello rspec-users, I''ve encountered a strange bug in rspec, but it may be me who is wrong. I''m running latest version from the trunk (r1678) of both rspec and rspec_on_rails. Please consider the following model: class Url < ActiveRecord::Base def after_save Contact.create!(:primary_email => ''user at example.com'') raise

Would it make sense for rake db:migrate to support creating databases if it is not found, with blessing from user to prevent typos, or as an additional command line switch. Or am I just being too lazy? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi! I''m thinking of implementing datagrid like functionality for showing data (models) in grids so that I don''t have to re-invent the view/controller for each table I need. There are number of parameters that need to be customizable: column titles, row style depending on the data (i.e. showing all rows with balance<0 in red), is column sortable, sort-algorithm etc. To

Hi! Is it possible to render the action within the after_filter method, or is the rendering performed before? I have something like this: class FooController after_filter :send def a @content=... end def b @content=.. end protected def send send_data(@content,...) end end However, when calling the action a or b, the @content doesn''t get sent, but instead

Hi! I''m writing a datagrid plugin and would like to render the datagrid using a .rhtml template. However, I''d like to avoid placing this template in app/views/shared, but it should reside somewhere within vendor/plugins/datagrid/... Any ideas? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, I ve defined the following relation in one of my models with a dynamic where condition: has_one :selection, :foreign_key => ''object_id'', :conditions => ''selection_type = 1 and account_id = # {self.send(:account_id)}'' That works perfect, however when I try to eager load that relation I am getting the following error when doing a

I am a bit of a rails and rspec noob. I am trying to use rspec in conjunction with CruiseControlrb. When I run a cruise build having spec errors, the build does not indicate a failure. I have tried to track down why this is the case, and my best guess is that the spec task is kicking off the spec via a ruby() method in rake, and that ruby method does not propagate my spec failure back to

hi there, I have in my controller, the following to catch a link_to_remote: def form_part_add_personnel @credit_types = CreditType.find(:all) p = Credit.new() p.id = rand.to_s[2..-1] render :update do |page| page.insert_html :bottom, "script", :partial => ''films/form/personnel'',

I was wondering how can I insert straight xml, ie "<a>test</a>" inside the builder syntax. For example, i want to be able to do something like this xml.A do xml.B do "<a>test</a>" end end should give: <A> <B> <a> test </a> </B> </A> Anybody have a clue on this one? --

i have one extension going straight to voicemail, while others that are configured identically don't, so i don't think it's an overall config problem. nor do i think it's a callerID problem. maybe it's an enduser operation that i can't find documentation on? che*CLI> -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/48-1' -- Executing Macro("Zap/48-1",

I installed a new * server and copied the sip.conf and extensions.conf from my existing setup to the new box. I created my outbound trunk with a different broadvoice account and am able to dial out without issue. I am able to dial all extensions but I go straight to voicemail without any ringing, this happens to both local and outside numbers calling my extensions. I have the correct firewall

Hi, I am having a problem with inbound calls (from a SIP VIOP provider). When caller ID information is not available, the calls go straight to voicemail. We are using a mix of either Sipura 841 phones or SPAs. When the call is passed to the phone/SPA, Asterisk reports "Got SIP Response 406 "Not Acceptable" back from..." I have searched a while now and can't seem to

Hi, Is there a way to associate a user's the login (imap-login) process with the user's 'imap [' process? We are trying to lock down an issue to make sure we full understand it. /proc and shared memory tools weren't particular useful. Just for context, we are having an intermittent locking index cache locking issue that appears to impact only a subset of our users. The