similar to: Memory footprint

We have a large bitcode file produced from a tool. It's about 23 meg. When we compile this with llc, the footprint is 4-7 gig depending on which target. On a desktop this is not such a problem but it is on mobile devices. The suspect is that the flow graph for the entire program is built and kept for the duration, even if no optimization needing it all is in progress. This would make us

Hey all, I have a potential project which calls for a very small form-factor computer like this: http://www.marvell.com/products/embedded_processors/developer/kirkwood/sheevaplug.jsp However, I am needing an FXS port integrated into a small footprint computer. Nothing larger than a WiFi router or gateway device, but the smaller the better, and able to run Asterisk with at least a spare USB port

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 What is the expected footprint of a tool using the LLVM JIT? I have created a simple project that uses the LLVM C++ API to JIT calls to XPCOM method signature... it works well, but the component DLL is very large (Linux x86-74, 5.8MB optimized and stripped). Is this normal? Am I linking to "too much" or not using the correct link flags?

Hello to everyone on the list, This is my first message sent to the list so bare with me on this one :) I've started learning C++ of September of last year in school. I think I'm fairly competent(I Hope :) at it and we were recently discussing bloatware in class. Vorbis seems so large and complex that I offen get intimidated, so I was wondering if anyone else would like to

Hi, In the past months we were working on two LLVM passes which use data objects of functions as input. One pass computes the "data-direction" (FORTRAN users know this as intent) of the object, i.e. whether it is read-only, write-only or read-write. The second pass injects code into the LLVM module that, when called at run-time, computes the memory footprint of the object. This also

I have a website up and running on TextDrive with Rails/lighttpd/fcgi. Unfortunately, as my account is a "shared server" account on TxD, they kill processes that are hogging resources (quite understandably). Unfortunately for me, my Ruby fcgi processes load up rather ... large (just under 50mb). It doesn''t take much to push it to 50mb, at which point it gets killed. Does

Dear all, I tried to read in a 3.8Gb RDS file on a computer with 16Gb available memory. To my astonishment, the memory footprint of R rises quickly to over 13Gb and the attempt ends with an error that says "cannot allocate vector of size 5.8Gb". I would expect that 3 times the memory would be enough to read in that file, but apparently I was wrong. I checked the memory.limit() and that

Hal, On 02/18/2013 06:33 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: [...] >> In the past months we were working on two LLVM passes which use >> data objects of functions as input. One pass computes the >> "data-direction" (FORTRAN users know this as intent) of the >> object, i.e. whether it is read-only, write-only or read-write. The >> second pass injects code into the LLVM

Hello This is my first mail for this list, so please be considerately. I'm trying to build a tiny version of samba for an embedded device. currently im using the version 2.2 with a footprint of smbd 2.4M. Thats to much. Is there a way/patch to build smbd without everything beside file exchage? I don't need printer, swat, ldap,.... support. Just exchange. I have disabled most of the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Chris Lattner wrote: > Finally, there is still a lot that can be done to reduce code size. For > example, building a JIT links in the .s file printers in, and they have > non-trivial size (big string tables etc). It would be great to refactor > the code to avoid things like this. I wouldn't be surprised if we could > shrink the

On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:02 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > We have a large bitcode file produced from a tool. It's about 23 meg. > > When we compile this with llc, the footprint is 4-7 gig depending on > which target. > > On a desktop this is not such a problem but it is on mobile devices. > > The suspect is that the flow graph for the entire

Hi, I want to use PXELINUX to load a DOS disk image which I currently use for Win2K/XP unattended installs. I want to move away from reliance on specific NDIS2 drivers and use the 3Com UNDIS3C driver instead. I have used this successfully to start the MSClient, but the problem is that the UNDI and PXE layer take about 90K of base memory, which means that WINNT.EXE has insufficent memory to run

Hi Sebastian, On 18/02/13 19:02, Sebastian Dreßler wrote: > Hal, > > On 02/18/2013 06:33 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > [...] > >>> In the past months we were working on two LLVM passes which use >>> data objects of functions as input. One pass computes the >>> "data-direction" (FORTRAN users know this as intent) of the >>> object, i.e.

On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Benjamin Smedberg wrote: > What is the expected footprint of a tool using the LLVM JIT? Right now it's ~1.5 to 2M for one platform, at least on darwin. > I have created a simple project that uses the LLVM C++ API to JIT calls > to XPCOM method signature... it works well, but the component DLL is > very large (Linux x86-74, 5.8MB optimized and stripped). Is

Hi, Current implementation: setequal <- function (x, y) { x <- as.vector(x) y <- as.vector(y) all(c(match(x, y, 0L) > 0L, match(y, x, 0L) > 0L)) } First what about replacing 'match(x, y, 0L) > 0L' and 'match(y, x, 0L) > 0L' with 'x %in% y' and 'y %in% x', respectively. They're strictly equivalent but the latter

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sebastian Dreßler" <dressler at zib.de> > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 7:49:39 AM > Subject: [LLVMdev] Passes for object memory footprint / data-direction > > Hi, > > In the past months we were working on two LLVM passes which use data > objects of functions as input. One pass

Hi all, I was trying to use LTO facility of LLVM to reduce the footprint of Clang itself. I build the ld-gold  and LLVMgold.so as described at [1] and then set the environment as described too. However, had to add the path for plugin manually as Clang was not able pass it to ld automatically. Following is the setting I used before starting to build (small foot Clang. CXX=clang++ -flto

Hello, I am attempting to train a random forest model using the randomForest package on 500,000 rows and 8 columns (7 predictors, 1 response). The data set is the first block of data from the UCI Machine Learning Repo dataset "Record Linkage Comparison Patterns" with the slight modification that I dropped two columns with lots of NA's and I used knn imputation to fill in other gaps.

How about unique them both and compare the lengths? It's less work, especially allocation. Pete ____________________ Peter M. Haverty, Ph.D. Genentech, Inc. phaverty at gene.com On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 1:30 PM, peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> wrote: > If you look at the definition of %in%, you'll find that it is implemented > using match, so if we did as you suggest,

Hi Manman (and llvmdev), I filed these two bugs to track the ideas that I was cooking: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17891 http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17892 TL;DR: I'm saying we should go from: !14 = metadata !{i32 786445, metadata !1, metadata !10, metadata !"y", i32 3, i64 32, i64 32, i64 32, i32 0, metadata !13} to: !14 = metadata