similar to: Private Address Routing via Tunnels

Hello I have /25 addressed on a box (virtual devices on eth0) and I want to tunnel some of these addresses to my home network. One address to my gateway (a.b.c.d, external IP) and one address to my internal network (192.168.0.0/24-style). I will use the tunnels for irc, smtp and surfing. What protocol and which technique is easiest and best to use? One more thing. I don''t want to set up

Hi, Does anyone tried to get ipip or gre tunnel behind NAT environments. ? i''m trying to make both side tunneling with ipip or gre with private address just like belows.. A -------------------FIRWWAL -------------------INET ------------------- B PRIVATE PUBLIC PUBLIC (10.100.0.1) (211.xxx.xxx.xxx) (

Hi guys, I''m trying to setup an IPIP tunnel between a Cisco router and a firewall running Debian GNU/Linux Sarge with Shorewall 2.0.13. I''ve read and implemented the http://shorewall.net/IPIP.htm document, but I don''t understand why there should be at the same time a "tunnel" and a "tunnels" script. Shorewall still refuses to let the

On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 11:28:47AM +0100, <Alpt>: ~> On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 11:29:21AM +0100, <Alpt>: ~> ~> The multipath code creates new cached routes. Since ~> ~> after connect the socket is "connected", i.e. saddr and ~> ~> daddr are known and they are always provided when resolving ~> ~> route ~> ~> ~> ~> So, the connected

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution|

This is really strange behavior .. root@garfield ~# ip tunnel add testing123 mode ipip remote 192.168.1.1 local 192.168.1.12 root@garfield ~# ip tunnel show .. testing123: ip/ip remote 192.168.1.1 local 192.168.1.12 ttl inherit root@garfield ~# ip tunnel add testingabc mode ipip remote 192.168.1.1 local 192.168.1.12 root@garfield ~# echo $? 0 root@garfield ~# ip tunnel show .. testing123:

I''ve tried with iproute and it works now ! commands for A: ip tunnel add mode ipip tunl1 local IP_A remote IP_B ip addr add dev net1 local virtual-IP_A remote virtual-IP_B ip link set net1 up Same on B. And then from A i''m able to ping virtual-IP_B. It seems one can not use tunl0 as a tunnel name, is it true ? I think it will be a good thing to add to the section 5.2 of the

After carefull reading (LARTC) and experimentation, I am in a dead end... I am using several IPIP tunnels (linux ipip module, IP protocol 4). I''d like to filter packets going through these tunnes to different classes, on the ingress device, based on source and destination IP _INSIDE THE TUNNEL_. First I tried the nexthdr bit. As explained in LARTC, nexthdr jumps to the next header

I was trying the following setup with IPIP tunnels, one that used to work through another ISP, but no longer... Internal network | Linux box 1 (kernel 2.2.24) iif=10.0.0.1, extf=a.b.c.d, tunf=172.16.0.1 | |local metropolitan network | Another Linux box 2 (kernel 2.2.17, or 2.4.19, same result) iif=irrelevant, extf=x.y.z.v,

I have been studying traffic control in linux these days. I became to know there are several qeueuing displines such as tbf, cbq, htp, etc. But, there isn't the comment whether they support IPv6 traffic. I got this question because there is no comment about how to connect qdisc classes with IPv6 flow using "tc filter" command, and I think the "tc filter" command

Hi I am trying to setup an ipip tunnel to another linux router and am having serious problems. A bit of background first though because we may be going at this from the wrong angle. I have a router that runs bering firewall of a CF flash card that is going to act as a gteway for the amateur radio amprnet network. Heres what I need from it- I have an internal network 192.168.1.1 etc and a

I am desperately trying to impute missing data using 'imp.mix' but always run into this yucky error message to which I cannot find the solution. It's the first time I am using mix and I'm trying really hard to understand, but there's just this one step I don't get...perhaps someone knows the answer? Thanks! Jens My code runs:

This may be answered somewhere but i tried googling for it with no luck, so... What''s the limit on number of traffic classes (classid) you can define on Linux ? -- Using M2, Opera''s revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Hi! Can I create the unnumbered GRE tunnel with iproute2 utility? Can someone provide me a link/howto/example_config how to do it? The topology is one tunnel between two linux boxes: -- eth1-|__|-eth0 <-------------> eth0-|__|-eth1 -- I''m trying now with: ip tu add tun1 mode gre local loc.IP remote rem.IP ttl 255 dev eth0 ip addr add tun1 0.0.0.0 ip link set tun1 up but it

Hi All: Ok, here is my network: 192.168.1.0/28 is the network behind the Cisco, the Gig0/1 interface is 192.168.1.1. Linux box is 192.168.1.96/28 behind with 192.168.1.97 the Eth1 interface. I have the Ipsec tunnel up and working between them using preshared keys. So that works. Here is the Cisco tunnel setup: interface Tunnel6 ip address 192.168.2.110 255.255.255.240 tunnel source

A stupid question: which is recomended? I have 1 interface eth0. I need to set about 20 virtual interfaces eth0:xx on it. If I create them with ifconfig eth0:xx I see it with ifconfig and with ip addr ls. If I set it with ''ip addr add'', ifconfig don''t show them, but ''ip addr ls'' and ''route'' show them. So, which is better?

Hi there, I''m trying to achieve the classic load balancing using the multipath. The gateways are: A (tunl0) and B (tunl1) This is the classical situation covered by the HOWTO: one computer with two Internet connections. The problems come when I try to use the same IPs for both A and B. So A is 10.229.25.8 and B 10.229.25.8. I cannot do otherwise, I''m forced to use the

Hey everyone , I'm using tinc from iran , and i've been using tinc with tcponly for a few years now , to bypass the filtering , and have access to the free internet , but recently , our government started to apply some sort of exotic filtering scheme , they've completely blocked outgoing and incoming ssh requests , and ssl encrypted packets , and the only thing allowed is https !! ,

mdew:~# tc qdisc add dev imq0 handle 1: root htb default 12 r2q 1 Cannot find device "imq0" mdew:~# lsmod Module Size Used by Not tainted ipt_REDIRECT 728 0 (autoclean) ipt_MARK 728 2 (autoclean) iptable_mangle 2100 1 (autoclean) ipt_REJECT 2712 4 (autoclean) iptable_filter 1672 1 (autoclean)

Hi, I have a problem with GRE tunneling. I read Advanced-Routing HOWTO about this and I did all as is written in this documentation. Even the same example is here which I need for my project. I want create (by means of GRE tunneling or IP in IP tunneling) virtual private network VPN - in first phase without IPsec in other phase with IPsec. I have two local networks distant apart with two routers.