similar to: two interfaces - borrowing bandwidth...

I'm looking for some information regarding the interaction of KVM, VLANs, firewalld, and the kernel's forwarding configuration. I would appreciate input especially from anyone already running a similar configuration in production. In short, I'm trying to figure out if a current configuration is inadvertently opening up traffic across network segments. On earlier versions of CentOS

Hello, can anybody help me how to configure vlans? There are vlans: vlan2 vlan3 vlan30 Server has one nic - eth0. vlan2 should be dom0 eth0(peth0) for management Each vlan3 and vlan30 should be has its own bridge. How to make it? Br Peter _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

On my debian woody (kernel 2.4.31) the tcpdump doesn''t work with imq0 devices. If I try to tcpdump imq devices there is no packet seen: [...] rt1:~# tcpdump -n -i imq0 Warning: arptype 65535 not supported by libpcap - falling back to cooked socket tcpdump: WARNING: imq0: no IPv4 address assigned tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on

Hello all, We have just concluded a very drawn out test of our domain that is having some trust relationship problems with Windows 7 desktops. Here is a breakdown of our setup: roark PDC running samba 3.4.7 (also has OpenLDAP) on VLAN 2 archives3 BDC running samba 3.4.7 (also has OpenLDAP) on VLAN2 arrowhead BDC "home server" running samba 3.4.3 on VLAN 9 archives4 BDC

Thank you everyone. OK, the mystery deepens, I guess. The machine does need to support several VLAN's, it is currently on a trunkport (8021q encapsulated), it made it into the ARP table - which I specifically tested for by physically unplugging the table, clearing the ARP table and plugging it back in. The ARP table currently looks like this: hq#show arp Protocol Address Age (min)

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-03 16:49 ------- We haven't seen this

I''m playing around with VLAN''s and I have a VLAN capable (layer 2) smart switch. I see a steady stream of martians in the logfile if I have the routefilter option set on the loc zone interfaces in /etc/shorewall/interfaces. I have two interfaces in the loc zone, eth1 and vlan2 respectively. vlan2 is an 802.1q trunk going towards the switch. Is this the expected behavior in

I couldn''t find anyone who had actually made it work via google so I guess I''ll ask here. My setup is a VPN point to point link. The VPN is a modified version of Openvpn where I''m using zlib compression to improve the compression a bit. The goal is to shape traffic coming from a routing server through the vpn to the endpoint of the vpn and in such a way maximize the

On 03/20/2016 08:51 PM, Devin Reade wrote: > In a CentOS 7 test HA cluster I'm building I want both traditional > services running on the cluster and VMs running on both nodes On a purely subjective note: I think that's a bad design. One of the primary benefits of virtualization and other containers is isolating the applications you run from the base OS. Putting services other

--On Monday, March 21, 2016 08:57:59 AM -0700 Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote: > On 03/20/2016 08:51 PM, Devin Reade wrote: >> In a CentOS 7 test HA cluster I'm building I want both traditional >> services running on the cluster and VMs running on both nodes > > On a purely subjective note: I think that's a bad design. One of the >

And additionally here are the detailed port configs on the switch end: hq>show interface Gi1/0/3 switchport Name: Gi1/0/3 Switchport: Enabled Administrative Mode: trunk Operational Mode: trunk Administrative Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q Operational Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q Negotiation of Trunking: On Access Mode VLAN: 48 (VLAN0048) Trunking Native Mode VLAN: 48 (VLAN0048) Administrative

Hi all, I''m trying to put a linux GW running with this seput: Internet -> DSL Modem -> VLAN2 \ eth2.2 Linux > Lan eth2.3

I just realized that I hadn''t actually asked a question when I posted this before. Let me try again... I am trying to configure a Linux box with all possible VLANs (4094 of them), and a subnet on each VLAN. Creating the VLANs isn''t a problem. But, when I try to use "ip addr add ..." commands to assign an IP address to each VLAN interface, I get to do about 280 of

My hardware is a Linksys AP with MIPS 300MHz and Linux kernel 2.4.20. The traffics are from two LAN switch ports to WAN port. And the traffics are generate at a rate of 80Mbit. So the total traffic to WAN port is 160Mbit. The shaping works well that the traffic to WAN port is about 50/30Mbit according to configuration. But the priority seems strange when the root rate is 50Mbit. When the root

On 25 January 2015 at 15:12, Boris Epstein <borepstein at gmail.com> wrote: > OK... but why does it need to be a trunk port? > Because a trunk port will "trunk" the vlan. A VLAN is basically a 4 byte "tag" that gets injected into the packet header when the packet enters the VLAN network. When we trunk a VLAN we say to the switch "pass packets on VLAN x but

Dear list, I have the problem that child classes don''t seem to issue the parent class to borrow from their parent. This is a simplified version of my script: tc qdisc del dev $DEV root tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1: htb default 10 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 10mbit tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 1kbit ceil 512kbit #groups tc

OK, thanks again for all your help. I have resolved this, finally. The problem was that I configured VLAN 48 as the native VLAN on the trunk port.That was a mistake as apparently the native VLAN is the one where Cisco does not bother to tag packets. For now I set the native VLAN to VLAN 1 and that works. Cheers, Boris. On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Boris Epstein <borepstein at

Hi there, I have two ethernet connections of 2Mbit/s each and I''m trying to add them together to one 4Mbit/s connection but I cannot get more than approximate 1Mbit/s! My setup: I have a LAN (10.2.18.0/24), connected to a larger network (10.0.0.0/8) by two WAN-connections with 2Mbit/s each. On each end I have a Linux router. I first setup the routers to use TEQL with one of the

Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:43:03 -0700 Subject: Re: [libvirt] Problem with Open vSwitch and dnsmasq From: aatteka at nicira.com To: dano1988 at hotmail.it CC: libvir-list at redhat.com; roberto.sassu at polito.it; paolo.smiraglia at polito.it; dev at openvswitch.org On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Daniele Milani <dano1988 at hotmail.it> wrote: I think I could try the first solution.

Hey guys, I have a question regarding shorewall and vrf functionality. I have shorewall 3.4.8 and kernel 2.6.24-gentoo-r8 I have tried to use iproute2 (ip route and ip rule) to establish multiple routing tables. The biggest problem seems to be, that I cannot add interfaces such as vlan interfaces to the routing table. My target is that linux takes attention of on which vlan interface