similar to: split inbound traffic

Sorry all, this is the missing email that I referred to previously. I inadvertently sent it only to the original poster rather than the list. Sorry for the wasted b/w for those who don''t care... Ed W -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [LARTC] RED/GRED implementation for InBound Traffic Control (from ISP) Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 22:04:30 +0100 From: Ed Wildgoose

I''ve read through the nano documentation, and it says that it wont handle scenarios where the main traffic is input. Also, I''ve read through the linuxvirtualserver documentation, and i dont think that applies to me either, as that set up intercepts traffic and manipulates the final destination IP and port for the traffic. What I would like to do is 1) from the ISP standpoint,

Hi all, Can anyone show me pointers on how to get this implemented on a Linux box with tc rules? I also want to know, just how efficient is this Algorithm. AFAIK, inbound traffic control can''t really be achieved without losing bandwidth. In some of the howtos'' I''ve read, one guy had to limit his downspeed to 1/2 his bandwidth to actually control it. And he was saying

Hello, does anyone have a working solution for the shaping both incoming and outgoing traffic in such way, that for a given class the sum of incoming and outgoing traffic is specified? My ISP does the same thing, it gives me just a line of a defined rate, no matter the traffic direction (i.e. here is the line, the clock speed is 1024kbps, do what you want). I''m a litte bit familiar

Hello, does anyone have a working solution for the shaping both incoming and outgoing traffic in such way, that for a given client the *sum* of incoming and outgoing traffic is somehow defined? My ISP does the same thing, it gives me just a line of a defined rate, no matter the traffic direction (i.e. here is your line, the clock speed is 1024kbps, do what you want). I''m a litte bit

Dear all My current setup is the following: Normal Hosts --------+ eth0 eth1 | +----------+ +-<->| F/W box |--<-> Internet | +----------+ High priority hosts--+ My eth0 is a normal 100MBps LAN and my Internet connection is a 1Mbps ADSL line. What I want to achieve is to have normal hosts to share a big

+---------------+ +----+ ISP A | | | |-----------------| | +----+ | | +------+ | ROUTER | NET C | www | | LINUX |----------------| |

Hi you all, I''m working on outbound load-balancing between multiple (actually 2) ISPs. Examples given in docs/articles are perfectly working, but I would like to go a bit further. My idea would be to have a "cheap" LinkProof (from Radwar) box, and the major difference between this box and a Linux solution is that a LinkProof can be installed without changing the IP addressing.

The university is like a ISP to give access to Internet to several faculties, but we want to restrict the traffic, we needed a traffic shaper to do this, I wanted to have something like (Packeteer INTEL NETSTRUCTURE 7370 aplication server) which it is a bridge where I not need IP for my networks cards. somebody knows one good one to work it on Linux? Regards.

Hi, I have a linux-box with 3 eth, 2 of us go into 2 ISP. My localnet is masquerade with this rule: Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination SNAT all -- 10.0.0.0/16 anywhere to:211.56.233.186 SNAT all --

First of all, I''d like to thank Andy Furniss for his direction and for helping me get a working example up and running. For the following set up to work, you will need a linux computer at the ISP (server), a linux computer at the client location (client), and some a public range of IP''s you plan to send down to your client. (as this configuration involves patching the linux

Hi! I was updated kernel from 2.4.22 to 2.4.23 and now tc tools can''t correctly determine default (pfifo_fast) qdisc on interface: # tc/tc qdisc ls dev ppp0 qdisc pfifo_fast 0: [Unknown qdisc, optlen=20] but, if I assign f.e. cbq qdisc for some device all show correctly: # tc/tc qdisc ls dev ppp1 qdisc tbf 8009: rate 32Kbit burst 10Kb lat 1.5s qdisc cbq 66: rate 10Mbit

Hi, I think you now have 2 Links to the internet. You want to route web traffic (transparent proxy triffic) via one link and the rest via the other link. If it is the case, It is possible to do. I have done it. here I have mentioned eth0 and eth1 eth0 is connected to one link (link1) eth1 is connected to other link (link2) , via this link, web traffic will be routed. echo 210 link1 >>

Hi list, i have the following situ 2 ISP's one internal network. Load Balancing between the ISP's (with mpath) I want to route speciffic traffic over only one of the ISP's more specifficaly the ICQ traffic i have the following configs iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 5190 -j MARK --set-mark 0x5190 ip ru a from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx prio 201 t isp_rules1 ip ru a fwmark

>In theory yes, but it is shaping inbound transfers to my server. >YOu''re not doing any other sort of Ingress filters are you?? No >I dont care about destination port. That line was commented. BUT, incoming transfers are being shaped for some reason. >Could this be shaping on the ISP side?? What >happens when the tc rules >are shut off?? No, everything works fine

A Linux gateway has two interfaces: eth0, with a routable address on an ISP''s network, and eth1, which is 10.0.0.1 on a private network. There are several hosts connected to eth1, and these are allowed to send packets out of eth0 only after they login via a form at http://10.0.0.1. Once a host logs out, the gateway should no longer route packets for it. Each host also has a specific

J, What i meant is...like in Linux you make use of the two external connections and collate them as mentioned in the document. Can you try keeping the Linux box in front of the two windowze boxen and collate the two LAN connections coming from them as mentioned in the HOWTO???. Trevor On Sat, 2003-06-21 at 01:28, Tesla 13 wrote: > Hello Trevor, > > Windows computer with DSL line

Hi , this probably was asked many times before , but here it goes.. Until now i was using dsl_qos_queue - http://www.sonicspike.net/software/ Which limits outbound traffic and does packet priorites with iptables using MARKed packets.. works very well , I run a ftpserver + webserver so it''s usefull to set these 2 with lowest priority and my multiplayer gaming running on certain UDP ports

Howdy all, I posted this message to the netfilter mailing-list and didn''t get much response. I apologize if anyone here is getting this for a second time. Anyway, I recently migrated my firewall from a FreeBSD box running ipfilter, ipnat and dummynet to a Gentoo Linux box running netfilter and tc. I have to admit that I''m having problems visualizing tc in my head. So, I was

Hi Roy, It seems that I wasn''t clear. Lets give an example. I have a machine with a single ethernet interface, with two IP addresses A and B. This is done using two virtual interfaces. A is my IP address in ISP-A. B is my IP address in ISP-B. The physical line to ISP-A is 1.5Mbps. The physical line to ISP-B is 256kbps. I want to shape the traffic so that, for example, HTTP traffic