similar to: IProute and Traffic Control of PPC

Hi, I have a linux-box with 3 eth, 2 of us go into 2 ISP. My localnet is masquerade with this rule: Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination SNAT all -- 10.0.0.0/16 anywhere to:211.56.233.186 SNAT all --

i have both packages round, what are the diffs iproute2 justa follow on too iproute? Chris K Ellsworth _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Is there any linux distribution, with redundant internet connection management by ip included ? Thnx -- VETSEL Patrice Forum d''aide DEBIAN Francophone sur : http://kagou.tuxfamily.org/ _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hello all, My company is sharing it''s internet access with a neighbor and the neighbor in question was eating our bandwidth (both in upload and download) most of the time. I finally set up a linux router to limit the incoming/outgoing bandwidth to his network by adding a tbf on eth0 interface and eth1 interface of the router (neighbor is behind eth1 and we are in-between him and the

Hi there. My name is Lucas and I''m from Argentina. Firstly, forgive me for my english since it is not my native languaje. Now, I''ve been reading on how to compile iproute2 and found that I need to add the following to my kernel, which in my case it is 2.4.20, and it is also the one which this document I read talked about: CONFIG_NETLINK=y CONFIG_RTNETLINK=y # CONFIG_NETLINK_DEV

I''ve managed to get myself confused with what is probably quite simple so if there''s any definitive documentation then please give me pointers. I''ve read and tried the nano.txt document, that''s what I''ve based my current setup on and it isn''t working at the moment. I have two external links, a DSL link on eth1 and a cable link on eth2.

hi, I''ve encrountred some problem with iproute2... I''m building a router with kernel 2.4.20 but my script fail when I try to do a load balancing over a specific traffic, how explained on LARTC for balance the access between more link we should simple: ip route add default scope global nexthop via IP1 dev ETH0 weight 1 \ nexthop via IP2 dev ETH1 weight 1 for specific traffic

Hi, when iproute is installed then the default queue that it is giving to an interface is pfifo_fast. I would like to ask whether it is possible to disable this feature and rather have the kernel give by default to an interface the queue that it would give if iproute hadn''t been installed. I want to be able to customize the queue with tc only when it is necessary. Is this

Hi, not sure if it will work, i''ve 2 leased lines, behind line 1 is a webserver, this server should answer all incomming http requests through leased line 1, the webserver self parses other webserver, this outbound traffic should go over leased line 2. i''ve successfully added fwmark with iproute, but if i set the policy for the webserver to use leased line 2 (for parsing other

Hi all. Is it possible to use ipsec and also compress data from one linux box to another via a WAN link ?.. if yes how can i compress such data ??..by data i mean network traffic(internet) !! the corresponding linux box uses iproute & is linked with 2 isp. the idea behind is to use a maximum of the available pipe which is 2mb but with needs, has grown out... can u suggest how to do it or

Hi List, i have a realy strange problem with no solution yet, i''m using iproute together with the iptables mangle option, in a dmz network is a cisco pix present with another inet link behind, therefore i''m using the mangle option to split traffic on a protocol base like: iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth1 -s 192.168.1.5 -p tcp --dport 80 -j MARK --set-mark 3 and add the

Hi all How to add a static route to a hostname with iproute2? I tried: ip route add linux.com via 192.168.1.1 I got the following reply: Error: an inet prefix is expected rather than "linux.com". With "route command" I do not have problems route add -host linux.com gw 200.214.148.140 As the iproute2 is the standard in the current linus distros, I would like to know if is

Hi, I have the following situation: 1 gateway box with 2 WAN interfaces (eth1 and eth2). 1 LAN interface eth0 default gateway is eth2 I want to route all traffic with destination protocol tcp 22 (ssh) NOT over the default gateway eth2 but force them to find it''s route over eth1. All other traffic must go the normal way over eth2. Is this possible with tc or an other tool? --

hi all At last i got sucess !.. but am confused y it didnt work earlier..the difference today was that i reinstalled RH7.2 & complied kernel 2.4.16(not 17).. rest was same..... & the bandwidth too is under control!.. is it normal for to get more than said bandwidth--i mean i restricted a network with 8Kbit(with same script as below) but still was able to get a download(ftp) of

Hi all, I have setup two multipath route tables on my system for doing failover routing, What I want it''s that if GW at route1 of the MP is dead, traffic goes by route2, for doing that I have created the multipath routes as follows: ip route add table mail.traffic proto static nexthop via ${GW1} dev eth1 weight 1 nexthop via ${GW2} dev eth1 weight 250 But it does not run as I

Good morning, I''m writing to ask for collaboration in finding an improvement to a particular process. Today: To get traffic for our IDS sensors and a billing system, we collect everything at our core switches (2) by connecting a SPAN port from each switch to a server (so, 2 interfaces collecting traffic). That server changes the destination MAC address on all traffic to that of

Hi Andreas! I mainly understand what you mean, I tried to fix something on the script, I don''t know if I did it well. Can you take another look on it please and if is wrong to make the corrections directly on it so that I see where the mistake is... With this script I want to make limits for IP class 85.120.48.0/25 for international traffic in 256 KBps classes and for metropolitan

the question is simple. can i shape ppp interfaces using htb? thanx regards lucas -- ___ /\ \ __ __ _______ _____ _____ \ \ \ /\ \ /\ \ / _____\ / ____ \ /\ ___\ \ \ \_____\ \ \\_| \\ \____/_ /\ __ \\ \ ____ \ \ \_______\\ \______ / \ ______\\ \__\_/\__\\//\_____\ \/_______/ \/_____ / \/______/ \/__/ \/__/ \/_____/

Hi list, I try to install the following network: /-----------------\ | Firewall 1 | \-----------------/ ___________________| |_________________ | 10.2.6.1 10.2.2.1 | | eth1 | | 10.2.6.11

Hello all, This is just a self-aggrandizing note to inform you all that my rather brief introduction to traffic control using tcng and HTB is available now on TLDP. http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Traffic-Control-tcng-HTB-HOWTO/ I welcome any criticism. -Martin -- Martin A. Brown --- SecurePipe, Inc. --- mabrown@securepipe.com _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list /