similar to: RE: RE: LARTC digest, Vol 1 #1558 - 9 msgs

Hi Roy, Strange. "kernel will resend then together with new ones" - this is interesting, since the firewall DOES know how to drop locally generated packets and the kernel doesn''t attempt to retry them. I am not an expert on this, but I think it might be interesting to check how the firewall does this. Another option would be to trick the kernel that the packet has been

Hi Roy, It seems that I wasn''t clear. Lets give an example. I have a machine with a single ethernet interface, with two IP addresses A and B. This is done using two virtual interfaces. A is my IP address in ISP-A. B is my IP address in ISP-B. The physical line to ISP-A is 1.5Mbps. The physical line to ISP-B is 256kbps. I want to shape the traffic so that, for example, HTTP traffic

Martin, If I understand whay you are suggesting, there is a problem in your design: It will only work if you use Hide NAT. The problem is that the ip_src == IP0 rule is wrong: The ip_src is not changed by the router and it is not equal to the IP of any of the machine interfaces. Can you think of a solution that will work in the following reasonabl scenario: Lets say I have two T1 internet

Hi all, I have setup two multipath route tables on my system for doing failover routing, What I want it''s that if GW at route1 of the MP is dead, traffic goes by route2, for doing that I have created the multipath routes as follows: ip route add table mail.traffic proto static nexthop via ${GW1} dev eth1 weight 1 nexthop via ${GW2} dev eth1 weight 250 But it does not run as I

Andrew: Differentiated Service on Linux HOWTO (work in progress) could be of some help for you. Have a look at http://opalsoft.net/qos Best regards, Leonardo Balliache >Message: 6 >From: "Burnside, Andrew" <Andrew.Burnside@thalesgroup.com> >To: "''lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl''" <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl> >Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 13:24:44

Message: 12 From: Gery Kahn <geryk@sphera.com> To: "''lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl''" <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 20:28:30 +0200 Subject: [LARTC] priority of class ->split traffic in 2 more classes ->tc class add dev eth0 parent 2:0 classid 2:21 cbq avpkt 1000 bandwidth ->100Mbit \ ->rate 70Mbit prio 3 maxburst 20 ->tc qdisc add

Здравствуйте lartc-request, Friday, October 03, 2003, 8:44:37 AM, you wrote: lrmdn> Send LARTC mailing list submissions to lrmdn> lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl lrmdn> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit lrmdn> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc lrmdn> or, via email, send a message with subject or body ''help'' to lrmdn>

Здравствуйте lartc-request, Sunday, September 28, 2003, 8:45:03 AM, you wrote: lrmdn> Send LARTC mailing list submissions to lrmdn> lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl lrmdn> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit lrmdn> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc lrmdn> or, via email, send a message with subject or body ''help'' to

> Message: 9 > To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl > Subject: Re: [LARTC] Traffic Balance > Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 20:26:55 -0300 (EST) > From: favero@grad.ufsc.br > > list members: if u don´t wanna help, dont disturb! damn god! > everybody here know that LARTC tutorial to load balance is > incomplete! > Alexis: try http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt and search the list. > U

Hi I''m looking for a quick recipe for a newbie to control http traffic in my linux gw. My internet is overloaded already and vpn external clients are experiencing troubles (disconnecting in peak hours). Any suggestions ? Regards Guillermo Caracas/Venezuela On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 14:40, lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl wrote: > Send LARTC mailing list submissions to >

Hi! >Message: 5 >Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 17:00:21 +0530 >From: Sudheer Divakaran <sudheer@svw.com> >To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl >Subject: [LARTC] Is Linux based Router feasible > >Hi, > >I''ve a local LAN consisting of about 150 machines. I''m using a Linux >machine as the gateway machine which inturn connects to two different >ISPs. My

Anyone have any other ideas I could try to debug this issue? :) -- Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, Aron Rotteveel 2015-03-27 16:02 GMT+01:00 Aron Rotteveel <rotteveel.aron at gmail.com>: > Hi Kevin, > > Just did: same result. > > -- > Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, > > Aron Rotteveel > > 2015-03-27 14:32 GMT+01:00 Kevin Korb <kmk at

Hi Kevin, Just did: same result. -- Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, Aron Rotteveel 2015-03-27 14:32 GMT+01:00 Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Try it without any --delete options. > > On 03/27/2015 09:31 AM, Aron Rotteveel wrote: > > I am now running with --delete --numeric-ids --relative but the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Try it without any --delete options. On 03/27/2015 09:31 AM, Aron Rotteveel wrote: > I am now running with --delete --numeric-ids --relative but the > problem still persists. > > -- Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, > > Aron Rotteveel > > 2015-03-27 14:22 GMT+01:00 Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net >

I am now running with --delete --numeric-ids --relative but the problem still persists. -- Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, Aron Rotteveel 2015-03-27 14:22 GMT+01:00 Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Try also removing --delete-excluded. Without those two options there > should be no reason for rsync to require

Yes, I removed "--no-inc-recursive", without success. -- Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, Aron Rotteveel 2015-03-27 12:24 GMT+01:00 Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Have you tried removing --no-inc-recursive yet? > > On 03/27/2015 07:19 AM, Aron Rotteveel wrote: > > Hi Roland, > > >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Try also removing --delete-excluded. Without those two options there should be no reason for rsync to require gigs of RAM. Well, unless the other system has rsync 2.x. On 03/27/2015 07:29 AM, Aron Rotteveel wrote: > Yes, I removed "--no-inc-recursive", without success. > > -- Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, > >

Hi Roland, Thanks for the reply. Memory usage on both machines seem fine. The server has 4GB's of RAM, of which about 3GB is used during the file list build and about 1.5GB is used during the actual transfer. The client has 16GB of RAM with a peak usage of 8.5GB. I just tried three transfers in a row and it consistently breaks at a certain point, after which I get the "ERROR: out of

Hi guys, i have a problem with a configuration what i''m trying to do. I have two computers with linux, A and B, connected in the same network with this configuration: PC1 A: 192.168.192.1 PC2 B: 192.168.192.30 The PC1 A is a firewall doing nat... this one is connected to the internet via an adsl modem and of course it have its own public ip , and the router B is a smtp server but

Ok! If there are indeed cross-compiling targets defined, then vs2005 projects probably should be maintained. In any case, this is all up to Jean-Marc, since he's the one that actually has authority to change it :) Jean-Marc -- what's your opinion? On 11/28/07, Aron Rosenberg <arosenberg@sightspeed.com> wrote: > > I pulled the test directory from 2003, but everything else