similar to: RE: LARTC digest, Vol 1 #1558 - 9 msgs

Hello all, I have been doing a lot of archive searching over the last week reading posts on IMQ and it''s apparent stability / instability. I have seen a number of posts about it not being maintained as well. Can anyone talk to me about IMQ''s stability in a heavy throughput environment (20 Mbps) and what was causing IMQ to fail if you know. Thanks, Mike

I agree, but this is still better than crashing the machine... Aron -----Original Message----- From: Michael Renzmann [mailto:mrenzmann@otaku42.de] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 1:33 PM To: Aron Brand Cc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl; roy@xxx.lt Subject: Re: [LARTC] RE: LARTC digest, Vol 1 #1558 - 9 msgs Hi. Aron Brand wrote: > does this. Another option would be to trick the kernel that the

Andrew: Differentiated Service on Linux HOWTO (work in progress) could be of some help for you. Have a look at http://opalsoft.net/qos Best regards, Leonardo Balliache >Message: 6 >From: "Burnside, Andrew" <Andrew.Burnside@thalesgroup.com> >To: "''lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl''" <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl> >Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 13:24:44

Martin, If I understand whay you are suggesting, there is a problem in your design: It will only work if you use Hide NAT. The problem is that the ip_src == IP0 rule is wrong: The ip_src is not changed by the router and it is not equal to the IP of any of the machine interfaces. Can you think of a solution that will work in the following reasonabl scenario: Lets say I have two T1 internet

Hi I''m looking for a quick recipe for a newbie to control http traffic in my linux gw. My internet is overloaded already and vpn external clients are experiencing troubles (disconnecting in peak hours). Any suggestions ? Regards Guillermo Caracas/Venezuela On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 14:40, lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl wrote: > Send LARTC mailing list submissions to >

We run a Hosting farm behind a bridge/iptables firewall setup running Gentoo with kernel 2.4.20-gentoo-r6, connected to a dual 15Mbps international internet pipe / , as this: Net Pipe --------- eth1 Bridge/Firewall eth0 -------- Internal Hosting Network lately we have been looking at htb to somehow control excessive usage from the users behind, but in our implementation there seems to be an

Message: 12 From: Gery Kahn <geryk@sphera.com> To: "''lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl''" <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 20:28:30 +0200 Subject: [LARTC] priority of class ->split traffic in 2 more classes ->tc class add dev eth0 parent 2:0 classid 2:21 cbq avpkt 1000 bandwidth ->100Mbit \ ->rate 70Mbit prio 3 maxburst 20 ->tc qdisc add

Hi Roy, It seems that I wasn''t clear. Lets give an example. I have a machine with a single ethernet interface, with two IP addresses A and B. This is done using two virtual interfaces. A is my IP address in ISP-A. B is my IP address in ISP-B. The physical line to ISP-A is 1.5Mbps. The physical line to ISP-B is 256kbps. I want to shape the traffic so that, for example, HTTP traffic

Здравствуйте lartc-request, Friday, October 03, 2003, 8:44:37 AM, you wrote: lrmdn> Send LARTC mailing list submissions to lrmdn> lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl lrmdn> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit lrmdn> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc lrmdn> or, via email, send a message with subject or body ''help'' to lrmdn>

Здравствуйте lartc-request, Sunday, September 28, 2003, 8:45:03 AM, you wrote: lrmdn> Send LARTC mailing list submissions to lrmdn> lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl lrmdn> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit lrmdn> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc lrmdn> or, via email, send a message with subject or body ''help'' to

Hi After several days testing and studing howtos and docu again ... I want to limit all tcp trafic with the limit module to say one connection per second except some known trafic. (This is because of using p2p progs gets mi crazy which gets my adsl modem down and I share my net with some users and because of encryption of stream l7 does not work ...) As I understand the limit module does work

I have a router with about 300 clients connecting to it. It has htb with a class per client. I wnat to create a script to prioritise www trafic and ssh trafic over p2p trafic.... this is a sample of what i have now: /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:5 classid 1:8012 htb rate 35Kbit ceil 281Kbit prio 6 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:8012 handle 8012 sfq perturb 8 /sbin/tc filter add

> Message: 9 > To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl > Subject: Re: [LARTC] Traffic Balance > Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 20:26:55 -0300 (EST) > From: favero@grad.ufsc.br > > list members: if u don´t wanna help, dont disturb! damn god! > everybody here know that LARTC tutorial to load balance is > incomplete! > Alexis: try http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt and search the list. > U

Hi, I am an experienced libvirt user on Fedora versions from F15 to F17. I have developped scripts to route trafic from outside on multiple interfaces/multiples IPs to multiple VMs, and back to affect each VM the required external IP address. I have servers with more than hundreds external IPs, and up to 4 VMs, each of them route trafic on different external IPs. I have servers with Fedora

Hello, I've been given the task to study what would a good way to load balance SIP trafic. The prospective setup is : - call centers sending outbound SIP trafic (no inbound) from SIP devices (with public fixed IP address), - a couple of outbound SIP trunks to which trafic from call centers is to be forwarded - a load balancing system between call centers and SIP trunks. Load balancing

Hello, I have problems setting up HTB. This is my setup : NET 1024/256 ADSL || eth1 Linux Firewall eth0 || LAN 10.a.a.a I want to GUARANTEE for an IP (10.x.y.z) a 800kbit bandwidth for HTTP download. But When 10.x.y.z does no HTTP download, other trafic must get the whole bandwidth, of course. The script I use (see below) is quite the same as presented at (the greeeeat page) :

Yes sure here they are: The first one that i have received 2day and does not work almost at all: #!/bin/bash ETH_IN="eth1" ETH_OUT="eth0" BANDA_TOTALA="2Mbit" # pentru neclasificati ar trebui sa fie banda minima - 1k - aici ar trebui sa ajunga trafic necunoscut, # care nu e organizat in shape-uri BANDA_NECLASIFICATI="8kbit" #Shape generale /sbin/tc

Hi, I was reading document http://shorewall.net/MultiISP.html#idp3634200. Inspired by the document I was trying to establish the following changes: * one additional interface: COMA_IF * COM[A,B,C]_IF interfaces request IP address via DHCP * all non-RFC 1918 destined trafic is NATed from INT_IF to COMA_IF * all non-RFC 1918 destined trafic from GW is routed via COMB_IF by default * non-RFC 1918

Hi I have outgoing speed 128kbit and 5 users. So I want to cat outgoing traffic to 50kbit per user. The best Idea is make HTB queue 10kbit ceil 50kbit but one user (the Donkey one :) ) who using P2P take all the outgoing band. When I make HTB is trafic was very low Donkey doesn''t get any data or take only a little, outgoing traffic was about 1-2K, but In HTB trafic I have full outgoing

Hi. I newie here :) I want to do trafic control, but when i do something very small i get rtnetlink error. I found some requeriments... I recomplied the kernel with QoS''s enabled, but about iproute2, tc, etc... what version I need?... what i realy need for do trafic control? I want to do trafic control with dst ip, limiting the bandwith that one pc can consume. Thanks a lots bye. Amadeus.