similar to: Puzzled why my scripts don''t give me the desired result

Could someone give me some help in prioritizing uploading traffic on my ADSL connection. Currently, I have set up a Linux 2.4.12 router/firewall/NAT to allow our network of users to access the Internet. --------- eth0 ---- Linux router/firewall/NAT --- eth1 ---- Local network a.b.c.d 192.168.1.254 I can''t seem to find enough information

Greetings, My question deals with the htb version of wonder shaper. I used it for some time without much alteration except I noticed something odd in the way the rates are set up for the 3 htb classes. The way I understand it, there are 3 classes: 1:10 - high prio class with rate ${UPLINK}kbit 1:20 - bulk/default class with rate $[9*$UPLINK/10]kbit 1:30 - bulk/default low priority

I''m trying to build a QoS system that would divide the outgoing traffic into four categories, each one also subdivided into two more categories. For that I chose a htb root qdisc subdivided into four classes, each of these classes contains also a htb qdisc. Until these point everything goes well, but when I try to attach a new class to the leaf htb qdisc a problem with the sintaxis

Hello, I’ve read this Article avout VOIP and HFSC http://automatthias.wordpress.com/2006/06/30/hfsc-and-voip/ I’ve got few questions ? Considering this tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:2 hfsc \ rt m1 ${UPLINK}kbit d 50ms m2 $[1*$UPLINK/10]kbit \ ls m1 ${UPLINK}kbit d 50ms m2 $[3*$UPLINK/10]kbit \ ul rate ${UPLINK}kbit rt = realtime curve ls = linksharing curve but m1 = ? m2 = ? d =

Hello, I''m a total tc newbie, and I''m trying to tweak the wondershaper script (http://lartc.org/wondershaper/) to get a slightly different result. Excuse me if I will not use the correct technical terms, it''s a whole new world to me :) wondershaper.htb creates 3 HTB classes; 1:10 is high prio, 1:20 is bulk (default), and 1:30 is low priority. The classes are

I have a setup where I have three NIC in a Debian box. I have eth1 conected to internet and eth0 NAT''ed to 192.168.1.1. eth1 and eth2 are bridged together, given ip 192.168.122.2. What I want to achieve is to perform traffic shaping on the bridge as well as prioritizing the traffic from eth0 very low. (This is from trental flat ...) However it seems that I am unable to perform thhe

Hi all, ive got 2 internet connections set up via the nano howto (which are working great) and we are running NAT. Was looking in to qos mainly to stop large http downloads/ftp downloads from hogging the line so that browsing for other users doesnt slow to a crawl, but if the line is free and no one is doing anything then for it to use the available bandwith. The wondershaper sounded exactly what

Hi, I''m really new to traffic shaping and try to implement the wshaper.htb script. I have a linux box that serves as vdr, mldonkey, samba, apache and mailserver (imap), connected to my LAN with 100mbit. I''m connected to the inet via adsl with a hardware router/firewall, got 384k downlink 64k uplink. When I have mldonkey running, imap (via Outlook) gets *very* slow (mails with

Hi I''m moving to hfcs (mostly succesfuly:) ), but I''ve encountered a strange problem: When I download something from this server using wget (one thread) via an idle uplink, I get no more than 130 kbit/s, and when I''m using prozilla (or start more wgets), I get about 200 kbit, but still it''s not all the link can do (240) - the rest remamins unused. Is this

Hi, I have been modifying the Wonder shaper to include another queue. My understanding was packets would be de queued to hardware in the following order: cbq1 -> sfq10 > sfq20 > sfq30. Also we only move onto the next queue when the preceding one is empty. However is seems to be prio xx number that reflects the order packets are de queued not to what flowid they belong to. If I

Did anyone ever answer this one? THIS is what I am trying to do: >[LARTC] cbq+sfq and DSCP marking >Maria Joana Urbano stmaria@dei.uc.pt >Thu, 13 Feb 2003 19:29:42 +0000 > > * Previous message: [LARTC] Monitoring.... > * Next message: [LARTC] two routes 1 network card > * Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] >

Hi folks, I''m trying to shape two clients in my LAN when accessing the internet. Actual situation is that EVERY traffic goes into 1:40, so the client which should fall into 1:30 does not get the lower uplink it should have, but the uplink defined for the client defined as 1:30 When I disable the definition of 1:40, every traffic falls into 1:30 (except for the traffic defined to be in

Hi I''m looking for a quick recipe for a newbie to control http traffic in my linux gw. My internet is overloaded already and vpn external clients are experiencing troubles (disconnecting in peak hours). Any suggestions ? Regards Guillermo Caracas/Venezuela On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 14:40, lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl wrote: > Send LARTC mailing list submissions to >

Hi all, I am very new to traffic control. I read the lartc how to and I am curently using the script in ch15 (cookbook) with some restricion : I excluded the ingress section and i implemented the rest on both interfaces of my firewall.(eth0 the internet interface and eth1 the LAN interface).find below the script use on eth1 (ssh priority one and all other 2)

Thanks for the tips Brian, Actually, I have many sorts of links, line PPOE ADSL, PPPOA ADSL which a use PPTP over PPOA relay, radio links that connect in the ethernet interface and cable modems. To change the SFQ queue size I must recompile de kernel? I think a saw some messages talking about that. One other thing, I have the 1:10 a 1:20 class, let''s assume there is no

As seen on my post at: http://www.sveasoft.com/modules/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=28112#28112 This works very well... It does NOT work with stable 4.0! sveasoft will be issuing a bug fix for this (4.1) in the near future. Final Rev of working script w/ asterisk support I'm not going to run alchemy on production machines until it is stablish. Remember to set your uplink properly and to set

Greetings, I have been reading the list for a little while now, but this is the first occasion I have had to post--of course, because of a problem. My problems began when I upgraded my RedHat 9 system to 2.6.10 from source. Aside from some other booting issues and things, all of which appear to be resolved, the only things NOT working are my scripts for traffic control. I get a whole host of

tc class add dev $DEV parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate ${UPLINK}kbit burst 6k tc qdisc add dev $DEV handle ffff: ingress tc filter add dev $DEV parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 u32 match ip src \ 0.0.0.0/0 police rate ${DOWNLINK}kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1 why does the download is being sent to class 1 which is limited by uplink ? why the rate is being mentioned in filter and in class ?

I am currently using the ultimate-tc script from http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.cookbook.ultimate-tc.html and I want to make sure that internet radio packets (mp3 streaming audio) will always get through no matter what. I have added some iptables commands like this: iptables -A OUTPUT -t mangle -p tcp --dport 8000 -j TOS --set-tos Minimize-Delay iptables -A OUTPUT -t mangle -p tcp --sport 8000 -j

Hi everybody, I have a network that only uses terminal services. Look at the diagram. 20 machines running WinXP <-> LinuxFW-1 <-> 1Mbit link dedicated fiber link <–> LinuxFW-2 <–> Terminal Server I’d like to give the maximum priority for bandwidth to terminal services (port 3389). I’ve changed the CBQ script from LARTC site to suite my needs, but every time I