similar to: ****************Free sex pic downloads***********************

Only Free Sex is one of the best and old xxx sites! Daily Updates - New Movies and pics every day Free Chat Bonus Adult Dating Services and much more from over 84 categories! http://forexha.blogspot.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send

*How early sex affects teenagers ? Girls who have sex at an early age are at slightly greater risk than their peers for feeling <http://tomorrowsmedicinetoday.blogspot.com/2007/06/early-sex-affects-teenagers.html> * *depressed, a new study has found<http://tomorrowsmedicinetoday.blogspot.com/2007/06/early-sex-affects-teenagers.html> * *FOR MORE INFORMATION LOG

Women in Texas. Nude Pic & Chat http://golddating.servik.com/texas.htm --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Good Morning Friends Free download software and watch software profile http://priyamaniforyou.blogspot.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from

Hi all, I have a problem with expiring sessions in the case with using mem_cache_store. I''ve been using ActiveRecord session store till now and expired them with SQL query. Yesterday I switched to memcache for storing sessions, however I can''t set an expireation period. My current config is this: ======================== memcache_options = { :c_threshold => 10_000,

On Jun 16, 2009, at 1:17 PMPDT, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Hello, Aaron > >> Can I ask what platform ABI's are documented other than Itanium ? > I'd bet all platform ABI are more or less documented. > >> I need to get to understand PIC on x86, x86_64 and PowerPC for the >> COFF and MachO backends. > ABI is normally induced by platform, not by

Due to the LTO modifications to the build system it is not possible to do old non LTO builds that involve some old PIC behaviour, this means Cygwin and possible other platforms old behaviours is broken, and they are not LTO'ed yet either. Would it be possible to have both the old PIC behaviour and the new LTO based behavious coincide via a flags like --enable-lto=(yes,no) and for older PIC

Aaron, > Maybe we should collect references and do some LLVM PIC documentation and > put it on LLVM website ? What you mean as "LLVM PIC documentation"? What should be included there? > Okay. We need documentation, what is the difference between DynamicNoPIC and > full PIC ? >From TargetMachine.cpp (actually this is show in llc --help): cl::values(

I was having problems with my exception handling due to mixing PIC and non-PIC code into my executable. Now I'm confused as to how I'm supposed to do this correctly when I do have to mix different code types. The basic setup: - shared library which throws and catches exceptions, some exceptions leave it's library bounds - main executable which throws and catches exceptions, exceptions

>> 2. ABI docs for Darwin (x86, x86_64, ppc, ppc64) you might find >> somewhere @apple.com. There you can have all 3 types of PIC code: >> static (no pic at all), DynamicNoPIC and full PIC. > > Okay. We need documentation, what is the difference between > DynamicNoPIC and > full PIC ? The best way to figure this out is to run a small program through and look at

Anton, >> Can I ask what platform ABI's are documented other than Itanium ? > I'd bet all platform ABI are more or less documented. Right. Maybe we should collect references and do some LLVM PIC documentation and put it on LLVM website ? >> I need to get to understand PIC on x86, x86_64 and PowerPC for the COFF >> and MachO backends. > ABI is normally induced

Actually, GCC will generate non-PIC for n64. Maybe that is a recent addition, but we are using its results. Even if PIC may be faster and smaller code, it seems that non-PIC is still useful for bare-metal. That's the driver of my interest. I guess we can just test what happens when that part of the conditional is removed. As a side note, if it isn't supported then we should probably

Hello, Aaron > Can I ask what platform ABI's are documented other than Itanium ? I'd bet all platform ABI are more or less documented. > I need to get to understand PIC on x86, x86_64 and PowerPC for the COFF and MachO backends. ABI is normally induced by platform, not by architecture or object file format (however they can influence on it). 1. Windows is PIC by design. Google for

Hello, Rafael > On linux X86_64, calls to local but externally visible functions > should use the PLT. Access to local (same compilation unit), variables > can just use RIP relative access. Right, this is just optimization. AFAIR, current code already does this for 'normal' PIC - it just checks for linkage and doesn't assemble call via PLT for stuff with internal linkage.

The short: Linking to libspeex.a when generating a .so using libtool results in a non-portability warning. This is due to PIC code and non-PIC code intermingling. How can I go about fixing this whilst still using an installed libspeex present on the user's system? The long: I am using autoconf + libtool to generate a codec plugin for speex (sipXmediaLib), and I'm trying to eliminate

Hi Folks - I''m pretty new to ACPI (don''t know my ASL from a hole in the ground :-), but I think the _PRT method has the PIC/APIC cases reversed. I''m looking at tools/firmware/acpi/acpi_dsdt.asl. The ACPI spec says a _PIC method (if defined) will be called with an argument of 1 if the host is using APIC interrupts. If the host is using PIC interrupts instead, it

On 07/08/2011 01:25 PM, Yuri wrote: > ELF that MCJIT writes on x86_64 has relocations in it. Particularly, > R_X86_64_PC32 relocations are used for the sections .gcc_except_table > and .eh_frame related to exception processing. > I am not sure where is general documentation on relocation types, > including R_X86_64_PC32. Looks like it's nowhere to be found on the web. > But

On Mar 11, 2010, at 6:07 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Mar 11, 2010, at 5:47 PM, Robb Kistler wrote: > >> I'm trying to build a very large shared library (bundle) for PPC on >> Mac OS X 10.5. The build looks something like this, where >> mybundlebitcode.o is the large object >> >> llc -relocation-model=pic -o=mybundle.s mybundlebitcode.o >> gcc

ELF that MCJIT writes on x86_64 has relocations in it. Particularly, R_X86_64_PC32 relocations are used for the sections .gcc_except_table and .eh_frame related to exception processing. I am not sure where is general documentation on relocation types, including R_X86_64_PC32. Looks like it's nowhere to be found on the web. But 32-bit relocation can't be used in 64-bit code since it

Has anyone experimented with generating non-PIC for MIPS64 and the n64 ABI? Currently MipsISelLowering.cpp uses conditions like: if ((getTargetMachine().getRelocationModel() == Reloc::PIC_) || IsN64) { } around any PIC code generation. Is generating non-PIC just untested, or is it known not to work? I can't find any discussion of it anywhere. I ran into this when trying to see why