similar to: Two Gateways and NAT??

hello, i have 2 links to the ISP of 128kbit each, and i want to balance the trafic between them, but not staticly (local ip1-5 throw isp1, and the rest to isp2). I though at a ingress clasification, then routing by the mark, and at the exit nat (yes i must do nat :(((, but the clasification must be flow based, and i dont know how to do it. C _______________________________________________ LARTC

Hi all Does anyone know if i can use ethernet aliases like eth0:1 in advanced routing like multipath routing in order to avoid to have nxEthernet interfaces in my Linux box. Thansk in advanced -- Guillermo Gomez <ggomez@neotechgw.net> neotech _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO:

Hi, I am migrating from one ISP to another, and would like to run both simultaneously for a while. So: (both netmask 255.255.255.248) [ISP1] 24.106.62.180 [ISP2] 209.181.237.230 | | | | \ / -----[ HUB ]----- | | -------- eth0 --------- | Linux FW/Server | ---------eth1 --------- | | [ HUB ] | 10.0.0.x/255.255.255.0 The default IP on

I need to route: from 196.33.50.0/25 (default route) to ISP1 from 196.33.248.0/24 (default route) to ISP2 ISP1 --------- fire --+---- 196.33.248.0/24 / | ISP2 --------/ +---- router ----- router ----- 196.33.50.0/25 What I''ve done: Default route via ISP1 created routing table ISP2 for default route via ISP2 I would like to do the following but they get

Hello, Thanks for the great Shorewall which has replaced my hard to maintain home-made scripts. First, what works. Our local network is 10.48.X.X with multiple vlan, each on a dedicated interface. We use Shorewall 4.4.11 from Debian Squeeze. We have a 2 ISP: - isp1 : an optical fiber provider with 10 Mbps. - isp2 : a DSL provider with 15Mbits/1Mbits. We use isp2 as the default outgoing

Hi, I just installed wondershapper 1.1a on my ipcop firewall box. I have roadrunner cable with a ftp server setup. My download speed is 2mbit (I get 225 KBytes) and my upload is 384kbit (I send at 43 KBytes). What should the settings in wshaper? I can ping yahoo.com at 90msec with little traffic.....and at around 220msec with full upload traffic. Mark

Hello,I have single linux router ( fedora core 1 ), 2 ISP, 1 internal network,1 IP space from every ISP My scenario: eth0 1.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.252 -> ISP 1 eth1 2.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.252 -> ISP 2 eth2 1.0.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 -> IP space from ISP1 eth3 2.0.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 -> IP space from ISP2 Config I try: /etc/iproute2/rt_tables: 10 isp1 20 isp2 ip

I''ve just started to recently look at CBQ and HTB, but I''ve been wondering whether or not something like the following is possible: I''ve got two external links: +--+ | |-----ISP1 |FW| | |-----ISP2 +--+ One link has a bandwidth cap, and the other doesn''t. What I want to do is, punt all outbound traffic out via ISP1

Hi there. Currently, our network design has two ISP lines and 3 subnets for LAN. Below are some details :- eth0 - isp1 eth1 - isp2 eth2 - subnet1 eth3 - subnet2 eth4 - subnet3 What i wanted to do is to assign incoming port 80 to our local squid server running on the firewall itself and assigned it to eth0(ISP1). I think it shouldnt be a problem as /etc/shorewall/rules provides a sample of the

I set up this config: +------+ -+ ISP1 +--+ +------+ | +-------+ +--+ linux | +------+ | +-------+ -+ ISP2 +--+ +------+ No problem. Standard setup with two ISP''s. Both routed subnets. Default gateway is ISP1. No magic here. Now I put a server behind the Linux box. I want the server to be reachable on an /extra/ IP in the routed subnet of ISP2. +------+ -+ ISP1

Hello everybody: Here is my "network layout": ISP1 ISP2 | | | | +-----eth0---------eth1------+ | | | FC 3 box | | | +-----eth2---------eth3------+ |

Hello again, I may have a common problem to solve but it seems it is harder than I thought... I have 2 internet providers (each one having a different gateway). Behind the router there are around 100 clients that are SNAT-ed. I want some clients to be SNAT-ed to the first provider, while the others to the second one. The following lines should work: iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s

Hi, At office, we have I ISPs. I want to lightly monitor each link latency in order to decide several routing. For that, I have only one external server: 1 IP, it's an OVH dedicated server. The quick picture is http://s24.postimg.org/n3436z64l/defaul_route.png Default route is via ISP1. If OVH-server pings IP1: - the request will go through ISP1: it's OK - the reply will go through

Hi all. I fear I''m slightly offtopic with this question, but I''ll keep it short: who is (or feels) responsible for the #lartc irc-channel in oftc.net? I''d appreciate if that person would get in contact with me (off-list) in order to discuss some ideas I have. Thanks in advance. Bye, Mike _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list /

I just installed Xandros 2.0 Desktop. I used apt-get to install iproute. I then downloaded wondershaper 1.1a from the website. I edited the script as the readme says. I went to console and started the wondershaper script...and i get the following error messages. RTNETLINK answers: Invalid Argument many times. Any ideas what is wrong? MArk _______________________________________________

Dear all Lartc, I try to split my Internet access to my 2 ISP with 1 linux (GNU/Debian sarge) 3 NIC router, I want all my users conneted with ISP1 and just some IP connected with ISP2 Here is my configuration: Internal network: 10.117.71.0/24 Interface eth0 ISP1: IP for my linux box: 1.2.3.4/29 Interface: eth1 Gateway: 1.2.3.5 ISP2: IP for my

Greetings, I''m new to LARTC and I''m trying to solve a problem with multiple clients accessing a game server. So I thought I''d give traffic control a shot. I''ve downloaded Wonder Shaper and have added this to the default script: tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 12 u32 \ match ip protocol 0x6 0xff flowid 1:3 I''m now quite sure

Hello, I connected the network 192.168.1.0 with 192.168.2.0 over the internet trough a GRE-Tunnel. I don''t know if I set up all things right: The client-pcs in both networks have a subnet mask of 255.255.255.0 and 192.168.2.x''s default gateway is the server wich has started the tunnel. The 192.168.1.x''s default gateway is 192.168.1.250 wich routes traffic destinated to

we have an external 2Mbit dsl connection and running on it are several gre vpn tunnels so far i''ve given priority to the vpn traffic (using htb) can i now put rules in for the tunnels to control traffic within each tunnel (that''s where our video conferencing etc runs)? or can i only control the real interface (eth1 in our setup)? if not can i somehow see the packets inside the

Dear list, Shorewall is running here with 2 ISP''s: ISP1: corporate ADSL-line with fixed set of IP''s ISP2: fast consumer-grade cable-connection with higher bandwidth All our main traffic (web, e-mail) is routed trough ISP1. Only for special purposes (frequent large ftp-transfers) ISP2 is used, configured trough tcrules. ISP2 is not so reliable as ISP1 (duh) and they sometimes