similar to: HTB Question

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "HTB Question"

2005 Apr 28
1
Packets Going to default class
Hi I have tested with FC3 but iam not able get any good results on that. in the list some one recomend me that > 3.17 HTB should work I saw latest FC4 test2 has the HTB 3.17 with iptables 1.3.0 i have install in my P4 box, and trying to test when iam uploading its working perfect, but when iam downloading its going to default class can some one experinced the same problem below is the my
2005 May 10
3
Packets going to default class iam having still the problem
Hi all Its been long time i have sending this message to this news group but i could not get proper responce from the authors or any experts that, is that bug or only the problem with my ssytem iam tryin this config with FC iptable 1.3.0 and latest TC tc utility, iproute2-ss050330 htb 3.17 iam trying past 2 weeks and digging all googles but could not able to come to conclusion whats wrong
2005 May 23
2
[Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: TC/HTB Graphs]]
Bogdan Coman wrote: > hareram wrote: > >> Hi >> >> iam looking to graph the tc classes and qdisc >> iam trying to access the stef scripts >> but its site is totally broken >> >> could some one point me where i can graph using good docs >> >> hare >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LARTC mailing
2003 Apr 15
3
IMQ+HTB problem
Hi all and tc Gururs i have patched the IMQ and htb to kernel, but when i do egress filtering, iam not able to see any traffic and excusted the following the commands modprobe imq numdevs=1 tc qdisc add dev imq0 handle 1: root htb default 1 tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100kbit tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 1:1 handle 10: htb default 1 tc class add dev imq0 parent
2005 May 21
2
TC/HTB Graphs
Hi iam looking to graph the tc classes and qdisc iam trying to access the stef scripts but its site is totally broken could some one point me where i can graph using good docs hare
2005 May 23
0
[Fwd: Re: TC/HTB Graphs]
hareram wrote: > Hi > > iam looking to graph the tc classes and qdisc > iam trying to access the stef scripts > but its site is totally broken > > could some one point me where i can graph using good docs > > hare > > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list > LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl >
2005 Apr 12
0
problem with Qos in FC2
Hi all Iam running FC1 with htb and tc, with iptables my setup with vlan trunking with linux box, and using cisco switch with fc1 iam able to run this config with b/w control well now i have upgraded to fc2 and tried fc3 also with out any b/w restrictions iam able to browse the sites very smoothly and able to access all the sites with out any problem when i introduce the Qos rule with 1 PC
2005 Apr 18
20
HTB stalling
Hi Couple months ago I started to have a strange problem with HTB. My setup is Fedora Core 2 + Pentium 2 233 + 128 MB of ram and its serving as a router. For some time since going to kernel 2.6 my HTB QoS Stalls for couple seconds, every couple minutes. If the connection load is bigger the stalling is more frequent and takes longer. I isolated the problem to be with HTB (CBQ works fine). The
2004 Sep 18
2
heavy uploads
Hi all iam using Iptables+TC+HTB on Redhat 9 working fine with the bandwidth control I am taging my eth1 with Vlan interface with Cisco Switch when even though i have mention ceil, its crossing more than Ceil, when they are effected Virus in their network or DoS attacks, its should be control the mentioned Ceil right, why this uploads are increaing.. when the uploads are increased all the
2005 Aug 08
7
Loadbalancing and failover using TC and Iptables
Hi all iam trying to deploy loadbalance and failover My setup description --Fedora Core 4 --Linux 2.6.12.3 #1 SMP Mon Jul 25 22:37:34 IST 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux --tc utility, iproute2-ss050314 --ip utility, iproute2-ss050314 --iptables v1.3.0 And i had deployed Following configuration #table main with priority 50, the highest one ip rule add prio 50 table main #table 201 ip rule add
2003 Nov 19
0
Load balancing and failover
Hi all i was going through the documents i need to achive the following setup, but iam confused to deploy but some one recomed me what will be good ------------------------ offic ------------------------ other office ----- Switch ----lan users ___________________ --- fiber link ___ wireless link now i want fiber both the links to be load balance from other office to this
2005 Jan 08
1
htb script
dear all iam newbie , i have 256 kbits of down link and 64 kbits of up link iam using squid and htb i have got this while browsing the net , there are some few issues i need help while running the script i want browsing to be as fast as possible , uplink especially kaaza should not eat my band width. eth1 got public ip address and eth0 is internal with network 10.0.0.0/24 iam also using nat
2004 Jan 08
2
Multihome- routes patch problem
Hi all iam trying to setup Dual gate using Julian patch DGD, but when i try tp patch to my kernel with fedora iam getting the following eroor can some one suggest me what is wrong or i need a latest patch for fedora [root@linux-2.4.22-1.2115.nptl]# patch -p1 < /root/update/update/routes-2.4.20-9.diff patching file include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_nat.h patching file
2003 Sep 18
3
Multiple Links
Hi all Iam planning to deploy Multiple Links using RH 9.0/ PIII 500Mhz/512MB RAM With all Patches related to Route and rest Mentioned in nano.txt Iam Running BGP 4 with all the ISP, but iam not doing Load balancing the Links Each Link have specific application and specific users. Eth0 is connected to Local Net eth1- ISP1 eth2- ISP2 eth3- ISP3 Now i want to make Specific Routes x.x.x.x
2005 Jun 16
1
Local unlimited traffic-international CIR
Hi all Iam planning to deploy new QOS system in my organization or small ISP I would like to achieve the following scenario 1. Many of the customers are connected to My ISP At this moment all the users are restricted either local or international traffic QOS is same. now i want to deploy all users which are travelling local services and other customers connected to my ISP
2004 Feb 02
3
layer7-filter with iptables problem
Hi iam running FEDORA, i have installed Source of iptable 1.2.9 with the patch layer7-iptables patch done with out any errors and i applied patch in kernel to the layer 7 patch and i have select the required option by doing make menyconfig done make dep make bzImage make modules make modules_install make install and rebooted with customer kernel when i type iptables -t mangle -A
2004 Jan 08
0
Fedora + TC
Hi all iam trying to migrate from my QOS Services from RH 9.0 to Fedora i saw that fedora shipping with latest TC with HTB patch Does any one see any problem with this version some expert coment will be apprciate hare _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
2001 Dec 28
1
need help in shaping traffic
hi all, my system with kernel 2.4.16 & 2.4.17( RH-7.2) has netfilter-1.2.4, iproute-ss010803, squid, dns with 4 ether cards.i am trying a simple situation where i want to shape traffic all the interfaces. at present iam using netfilter to allow a few ips, using transparent squid & iproute to limit bandwidth. i feel i must give more bandwidth for my local servers for my office &
2006 Apr 24
0
High Traffic Using HTB Tools
Hi all I have worked on HTB for the Customers traffic with VLANs working great, just b/w Limiting, not borrowing from each other class. but i never tried i high traffic Like 100MB internet Port with 100MB Traffic to internet iam trying to apply the rules in my Back Bone Router ( Linux RHEL AS 4.0) What is the people suggestion, how many of them in the list tested this kind of Trafic Just
2005 Jan 08
2
script
dear all iam newbie , i have 256 kbits of down link and 64 kbits of up link iam using squid and htb i have got this while browsing the net , there are some few issues i need help while running the script i want browsing to be as fast as possible , uplink especially kaaza should not eat my band width. eth1 got public ip address and eth0 is internal with network 10.0.0.0/24 iam also using nat