similar to: RE: LARTC digest, Vol 1 #1523 - 17 msgs

>Alen, > > : can i add HTB rule on virtual interface? > : example: eth0:0 > >First, it''s not really a virtual interface--it''s just a convention from the old days of IP aliasing to have names like eth0:0. > The IP exists and is active on an interface, eth0 in your case. > The short answer is "no". Traffic control occurs just prior to the

Hi Roy, Strange. "kernel will resend then together with new ones" - this is interesting, since the firewall DOES know how to drop locally generated packets and the kernel doesn''t attempt to retry them. I am not an expert on this, but I think it might be interesting to check how the firewall does this. Another option would be to trick the kernel that the packet has been

I agree, but this is still better than crashing the machine... Aron -----Original Message----- From: Michael Renzmann [mailto:mrenzmann@otaku42.de] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 1:33 PM To: Aron Brand Cc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl; roy@xxx.lt Subject: Re: [LARTC] RE: LARTC digest, Vol 1 #1558 - 9 msgs Hi. Aron Brand wrote: > does this. Another option would be to trick the kernel that the

Martin, If I understand whay you are suggesting, there is a problem in your design: It will only work if you use Hide NAT. The problem is that the ip_src == IP0 rule is wrong: The ip_src is not changed by the router and it is not equal to the IP of any of the machine interfaces. Can you think of a solution that will work in the following reasonabl scenario: Lets say I have two T1 internet

Andrew: Differentiated Service on Linux HOWTO (work in progress) could be of some help for you. Have a look at http://opalsoft.net/qos Best regards, Leonardo Balliache >Message: 6 >From: "Burnside, Andrew" <Andrew.Burnside@thalesgroup.com> >To: "''lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl''" <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl> >Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 13:24:44

Message: 12 From: Gery Kahn <geryk@sphera.com> To: "''lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl''" <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 20:28:30 +0200 Subject: [LARTC] priority of class ->split traffic in 2 more classes ->tc class add dev eth0 parent 2:0 classid 2:21 cbq avpkt 1000 bandwidth ->100Mbit \ ->rate 70Mbit prio 3 maxburst 20 ->tc qdisc add

Здравствуйте lartc-request, Friday, October 03, 2003, 8:44:37 AM, you wrote: lrmdn> Send LARTC mailing list submissions to lrmdn> lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl lrmdn> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit lrmdn> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc lrmdn> or, via email, send a message with subject or body ''help'' to lrmdn>

Здравствуйте lartc-request, Sunday, September 28, 2003, 8:45:03 AM, you wrote: lrmdn> Send LARTC mailing list submissions to lrmdn> lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl lrmdn> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit lrmdn> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc lrmdn> or, via email, send a message with subject or body ''help'' to

Hey Andreas, how i catch this traffic using L7 filter?, i´ve installed l7 filter now, but i don´t kwnow to use the kind of filter...!!! Can you help me? Thx.- Terraja-based 2007/4/29, lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl <lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl>: > > Send LARTC mailing list submissions to > lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World

> Message: 9 > To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl > Subject: Re: [LARTC] Traffic Balance > Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 20:26:55 -0300 (EST) > From: favero@grad.ufsc.br > > list members: if u don´t wanna help, dont disturb! damn god! > everybody here know that LARTC tutorial to load balance is > incomplete! > Alexis: try http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt and search the list. > U

Hi I''m looking for a quick recipe for a newbie to control http traffic in my linux gw. My internet is overloaded already and vpn external clients are experiencing troubles (disconnecting in peak hours). Any suggestions ? Regards Guillermo Caracas/Venezuela On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 14:40, lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl wrote: > Send LARTC mailing list submissions to >

Alejandro, So, i did try the script that you give to me, and the problems its continues.- Maybe the problem was in the IPTABLES rules, i attach the complete script below: ##################### ifconfig imq0 up tc qdisc add dev imq0 handle 1: root htb default 30 tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 500kbit ceil 2000kbit tc class add dev imq0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate

Hi! >Message: 5 >Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 17:00:21 +0530 >From: Sudheer Divakaran <sudheer@svw.com> >To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl >Subject: [LARTC] Is Linux based Router feasible > >Hi, > >I''ve a local LAN consisting of about 150 machines. I''m using a Linux >machine as the gateway machine which inturn connects to two different >ISPs. My

Hi folks, I`ve a problem to use HTB and SFQ. The first script, below, to show a simple configuration, does work fine...!!! But, in the second example, does not work, becouse i put more code to clasify the traffic by protocol, http and ftp in this case. Somebody can tell me the errors? Thx, in advance.- NOTICE: IMQ device is to asociate with ETH1 my external iface. SCRIPT que funciona:

Anyone have any other ideas I could try to debug this issue? :) -- Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, Aron Rotteveel 2015-03-27 16:02 GMT+01:00 Aron Rotteveel <rotteveel.aron at gmail.com>: > Hi Kevin, > > Just did: same result. > > -- > Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, > > Aron Rotteveel > > 2015-03-27 14:32 GMT+01:00 Kevin Korb <kmk at

Hi Kevin, Just did: same result. -- Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, Aron Rotteveel 2015-03-27 14:32 GMT+01:00 Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Try it without any --delete options. > > On 03/27/2015 09:31 AM, Aron Rotteveel wrote: > > I am now running with --delete --numeric-ids --relative but the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Try it without any --delete options. On 03/27/2015 09:31 AM, Aron Rotteveel wrote: > I am now running with --delete --numeric-ids --relative but the > problem still persists. > > -- Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, > > Aron Rotteveel > > 2015-03-27 14:22 GMT+01:00 Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net >

I am now running with --delete --numeric-ids --relative but the problem still persists. -- Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, Aron Rotteveel 2015-03-27 14:22 GMT+01:00 Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Try also removing --delete-excluded. Without those two options there > should be no reason for rsync to require

Yes, I removed "--no-inc-recursive", without success. -- Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, Aron Rotteveel 2015-03-27 12:24 GMT+01:00 Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Have you tried removing --no-inc-recursive yet? > > On 03/27/2015 07:19 AM, Aron Rotteveel wrote: > > Hi Roland, > > >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Try also removing --delete-excluded. Without those two options there should be no reason for rsync to require gigs of RAM. Well, unless the other system has rsync 2.x. On 03/27/2015 07:29 AM, Aron Rotteveel wrote: > Yes, I removed "--no-inc-recursive", without success. > > -- Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, > >