similar to: Port based VLAN Switch + tc + routing troube

Hello, I try to shape dhcp requests, but filter rule don''t work. My script is: # Init Shaper for dev eth1 tc qdisc del dev eth1 root # Init shaper root for dev eth1 tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 2: htb default 200 # Default shaper for dev eth1 tc class add dev eth1 parent 2:0 classid 2:200 htb rate 10Mbit prio 10 tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 2:200 sfq perturb 10 # Init DHCPD

hello, I have working htb system with about 1000 users. Until now I reload all rules at change, but it take too much time to apply. I cannot delete applyed filters. There is rules for one user: #!/bin/bash -v # Download shaper EX -> 2:20 /sbin/tc class add dev eth2 parent 2:20 classid 2:1775 htb rate 8000Kbit ceil 10000Kbit quantum 1514 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth2 parent 2:1775 sfq perturb

Hello, I have wrote some scripts to shape about 1000 workstations. My config: Pentium IV - 2GHz, 1Gb RAM, RedHat Enterprise Advanced Server 3, kernel 2.4.21-9.EL, iproute-2.4.7-11.30E.1 2 Gigabit Lan cards in bridge mode. I use htb. Everything work fine, but I have troubles with showing running configuration. # Init shaper root for dev eth0 tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 2: htb default 200

Hi all, I am testing one QOS system, I want to control bandwidth by VLAN id. Here is my test network: Internet Gateway | | QOS control box ( Bridge box, Redhat 9, 2.4.28 kernel with ebtables-brnf-8_vs_2.4.28 patch) | | VLAN Switch | | PC PC In my QOS control box, it is a bridge box, I used Redhat 9, 2.4.28 kernel with ebtables-brnf-8_vs_2.4.28

We are using VLAN tagging to put several networks on one machine. To ensure quality of service on one of the VLANs, we would like to prioritize (outgoing/egress traffic) one VLAN interface over the other (or others), but without capping bandwidth on any of the interfaces. We want to do this while being careful to minimize increases in latency on the prioritized interface. Since these are two or

On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 09:49:59AM +0100, M. Braun wrote: > > This is an interesting problem. I wonder how you would solve it if you > > would have a real (managed) switch instead of tinc to connect the > > access points and bridge nodes together? > > in the backbone we have HP ProCurve switches and all of them (except for > the oldest series from more than 10 years

After some digging in openvswitch code. My wild guess is that vlan tag reconfiguring triggered iface_configure_qos (vswitchd/bridge.c), which in turn called netdev_set_policing to reset ingress policing rate. Although there's no ingress_policing_rate set in my case, existing ingress qdisc still remove by default. Could some openvswitch guy help to confirm and suggest how to fix or workaround?

Hii All, VLAN is create in manageable switch, like Cisco Catalyst and other vlan cap= able switch. eac port in that switch can be assigned in different VLAN. so,= that switch capable to insert 802_1q to each incoming frame (Please correc= t if its wrong, i just newbie in VLAN).I want build VLAN but i don't have v= lan capable switch. Is possible to create a vlan capable switch using switc=

Hello - I am using kernel 2.4.27 and running into behavior I don''t know how to explain. I have 2 relevant interfaces. eth0 is external, eth1 is internal. My internal LAN is 10.10.10.0/24. My External range is 1.2.3.0/27 (dummied up). I have an H.323 videoconference device inside my internal LAN, but at IP Address 1.2.3.11/27. (IP Address dummied up.) I want to proxy ARP this

Hi, thanks for the feedback. > This is an interesting problem. I wonder how you would solve it if you > would have a real (managed) switch instead of tinc to connect the > access points and bridge nodes together? in the backbone we have HP ProCurve switches and all of them (except for the oldest series from more than 10 years ago) separate their forwarding database per vlan. HP calls

On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 12:31:20PM +0100, Michael Braun wrote: > I'm inter-connecting AccessPoints using a tinc mesh and have bridge-nodes to bridge this vpn into some existing backbone. > The AccessPoints bridge their users into 802.1q VLANs (per WiFi-Client, there can be multiple VLANs active on each AP) in the tinc mesh, and the bridge nodes bridge some vlans into the backbone. >

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Ben Pfaff <blp@nicira.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Qiu Yu <unicell@gmail.com> wrote: >> After some digging in openvswitch code. My wild guess is that vlan tag >> reconfiguring triggered iface_configure_qos (vswitchd/bridge.c), which >> in turn called netdev_set_policing to reset ingress policing rate. >>

You are very welcome. One thing that I am working on now involves removing the step toward the beginning: xe pif-reconfigure-ip uuid=<UUID of the bond created above> mode=static gateway=<GATEWAY> IP=<IP ADDRESS> netmask=<NETMASK> DNS=<DNS SERVER ADDRESS> I do not believe that this step is necessary since we will not use the pif directly. We will use

Hello I want to use vlans in my network and I would like to know if I cant filter for vlan ids to do traffic shaping? Anybody who has experience with such things? best regards Wolfgang

Hi, I'm inter-connecting AccessPoints using a tinc mesh and have bridge-nodes to bridge this vpn into some existing backbone. The AccessPoints bridge their users into 802.1q VLANs (per WiFi-Client, there can be multiple VLANs active on each AP) in the tinc mesh, and the bridge nodes bridge some vlans into the backbone. Now there is a router in the backbone that uses the same MAC on all VLANs,

With outbound QoS setting in Libvirt XML, libvirt will add a tc ingress qdisc for traffic shaping. Then if you set VLAN tag to that tap device, this qdisc will automatically gone by no reason. Could anyone shed some lights where should I look into? I'm really confused and got no clue here. Thanks! Steps to reproduce -- # virsh start instance-name # virsh dumpxml instance-name ...

While I am still in the process of working through this here are the steps I am taking to set up each machine. 1) Since each of my servers have multiple NIC ports I bond them together (see page 34 of the Administrators Guide) first. This is best down from the physical server and not via the remote console. If you do it remotely you will then have to reconfigure the management port before

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Qiu Yu <unicell@gmail.com> wrote: > After some digging in openvswitch code. My wild guess is that vlan tag > reconfiguring triggered iface_configure_qos (vswitchd/bridge.c), which > in turn called netdev_set_policing to reset ingress policing rate. > Although there's no ingress_policing_rate set in my case, existing > ingress qdisc still

Provides a mechanism to generate ip addresses for static networks and prefill the 'ip address' fields of the host and vm networking forms w/ the first suggested ip. --- src/app/controllers/vm_controller.rb | 2 +- src/app/models/ip_address.rb | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ src/app/models/network.rb | 11 +++++++ src/app/models/physical_network.rb |

Hi, has anybody a running setup with 2 or more tinc daemons in switch mode which transport 8021q tagged traffic? I am trying to connect two segments with about 4 x 1000 mac addresses (distributed on different vlans). I am always running out of memory on one side. This happens only on the side where the arp requests come from. Currently there is no unicast traffic between the sides; only