similar to: HTB: Packet header size option.

--- Mike Mestnik <cheako911@yahoo.com> wrote: > Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 09:51:21 -0700 (PDT) > From: Mike Mestnik <cheako911@yahoo.com> > Subject: Re: IPP2P: Simular project l7-filter. > To: Eicke Friedrich <tady@gmx.net> > > --- Eicke Friedrich <tady@gmx.net> wrote: > > Mike Mestnik wrote: > > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/l7-filter/

Sorry I pressed the wrong key and sent the message too early... > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Philipp Leusmann [mailto:philipp.leusmann@rwth-aachen.de] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. November 2006 12:53 > An: ''lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl'' > Betreff: Why did I need strange ceiling settings? > > Hi all, > > I recently installed traffic shaping on my

Ok, earlier I post a message explaining my problem with HTB and layer7 (or ipp2p), about not being able to shape the traffic. Well, actually this is what''s happening, I''m marking the packets (right now, I''m using ipp2p as Klaus adviced me to) with iptables, and my queue rules are made using tcng, I''m using the HTB qdisc, and traffic is going to the HTB class

It seems Andreas Klauer''s fairnat has experimental support for using HTB''s MPU and overhead options. fairnat.config: # Use MPU for HTB. From the LARTC Howto on MPU: # "A zero-sized packet does not use zero bandwidth. For ethernet, no packet # uses less than 64 bytes. The Minimum Packet Unit determines the minimal # token usage for a packet." HTB_MPU=0 # HTB_MPU=64

Hello. I have a 1024/256kbit ADSL and tried to shape outgoing traffic in order to improve latency. Here is my config. UPLOAD_RATE="256" UPRATE="$[4*$UPLOAD_RATE/5]" (a little smaller) UP70="$[7*$UPRATE/10]kbit" UP30="$[3*$UPRATE/10]kbit" UP20="$[2*$UPRATE/10]kbit" UPRATE="${UPRATE}kbit" IF="eth2" IPTABLES="iptables -t

Hello, some days ago, I was asking for help here about not able to do anything when I had bittorrent running, I will post the problem here: I''m using ipp2p to mark p2p packets, and then send them with -j CLASSIFY to the correct HTB class, I see traffic in the class when I start azurerus, and traffic does get shaped, but then I''m still not able to surf the web nor chat nor

http://sourceforge.net/projects/l7-filter/ Providse and posibly replaces your project. Thay use regex(in kernel space) to filter packets in much the same way you do. How ever regex is not going into the kernel! Here is a mail that describes the situation. http://lists.debian.org/debian-firewall/2004/02/msg00051.html Hopefully the l7 ppl will FINALY get a copy, now that I know thay

Hello, I''ve been trying to shape the bittorrent traffic (on my external interface, upload), but without luck, for this I''m using layer7 filter right now, but I''ve also tried ipp2p, with the same results, I might say that this is not a problem with this packet classifiers, the problem is with HTB, here''s why. When I open azureus (the bittorrent client I

I know there is that handy patch available to very efficiently use ATM bandwidth, but I was wondering what the best values to use with a non-patched iproute2 would be. Anyone here care to check my logic in coming up with these numbers and perhaps suggest better values? My transmit speed is 768kbps per ADSL line (I have two). This is the HTB shaping I do on the interface (logic used for this

Hi, there is something I''m not able to understand about HTB statistics. Why the qdisc show show how many packets are overlimits but in the classes there are always 0 packets overlimits or dropped? I try to expain with a simple example. I create a qdisc htb with only a class and then i do a lot of traffic. pc-innocenti:~# tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent root handle 1: htb default 10

Hi, got a 25/25Mbit connection which is quite stuffed. So I applied htb rules. Uplink: class htb 1:1 root rate 24500Kbit ceil 24500Kbit burst 4661b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 4661b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b level 7 Sent 430600689269 bytes 730147320 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) rate 23057Kbit 5520pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 lended: 199673949 borrowed: 0 giants: 0 tokens: -964

On http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/manual/userg.htm... There is a nice explanation on how/why to setup a hierarchy with HTB. Howerver what is missing is how to setup finters for this case? I had this working when I was using a seperat qdisc for each ?layer?, making each HTB only one level deep. Described in the attached qdisc.sh.GOOD. Described in the attached qdisc.sh is my current script,

Hi Here is something that worked with with 2.6.10-1.771_FC2smp and stopped working when I upgraded to 2.6.16-1.2069_FC4smp. These are fedora kernels and the network controller is an Intel Gbit (e1000) running a 100 Mbps Full Duplex. Don''t know how or if this matters but the 2.6.10 kernel has CONFIG_X86_HZ=1000 and the 2.6.16 has CONFIG_HZ=250 The idea is to just shape to , say 2Mbit, a

does anyone know a way to shape outgoing/upload traffic per ip? I have a network and i want to limit the upload with 100kbit per user. Ex: 192.168.1.20 ----> 1024kbit-DOWN / 100kbit-UP 192.168.1.21 ----> 1024kbit-DOWN / 100kbit-UP and so on....... Ive tried CBQ and HTB, but couldnt get is right. the only thing that I did in upload bases was: "tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root tbf rate

Hi. I wrote in a reply to a mail on here recently that you can''t set mpu (minimum packet unit) on HTB as you can on CBQ. I''ve just noticed that there is a patch on devik''s site which does mpu and overhead. http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/ For dsl users mpu is, for practical purposes going to be 106 - overhead is still variable though, depending on packet size.

An earlier exchange about someone seeing the rate larger than the ceiling is posted below. Andy explained the reason for the "above ceiling" rate in Daniel''s output . . . but I just saw an example that doesn''t fit. >> tc output >> class htb 1:14 parent 1:1 leaf 14: prio 1 quantum 3072 rate 256000bit ceil 282000bit burst 1820b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b

Hello there! Yesterday I started my experiments with HTB. I configured it this way: 1: root HTB qdisc | 1:1 HTB class rate 1000kbit | /-------+------\ 1:40 1:50 1:60 user1 user2 user3 rate 333 & ceil 1000 for everyone. User2 is disconnected and user1 and user3 are downloading. For all the time (t1-t5) there are ONLY these two users downloading! HTB should give

I want to thank the list and Andy Furniss for helping me get started with TC. Here is my current script with some additional comments. Please note that I can''t really endorse anything below, as I''m new at this. I can tell you that using the monitor_tc_top.pl script, I can see traffic going into all these classes and that my users seem very happy with the results (we are 57

Hello, I have a serious problem with HTB which I wasn''t able to solve myself. I run a masquerading router with ppp0 as interface to the Internet. Three clients need to share a downstream of 1 MBit, which I want to divide with tc. When I see a packet being forwarded to one of these clients, I give it the appropriate unique mark: iptables -t mangle -A FORWARD -d 192.168.34.141 -j MARK

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597 cheako911 at yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cheako911 at yahoo.com ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the