similar to: Consider r2q change, why !?

Hi, I have a default class for my un-marked traffic (prio 5) and a prio 0 class for the important stuff, but I do not understand why my download traffic is duplicated in both. It work fine for my upload traffic (same setting except the red class but I have the same result if I create an esfq instead). Any comments/information will be appreciated. Below my config : tc commands from my scirpt :

hello, i have a config that is with a large domain of rate, from 2kb to 40Mb and i have some problems with i don''t know how to deal with. so here are some classes 2 with q=1000, one with q 200000 and one with q=6400, all have been calculated by htb, in the code i speficien just rate,ceil, no quantum, no r2q, no bursts ($tc class add $IF_INT parent 1:2 classid 1:21 htb rate

hi. When I execute follow class setting qdisc 1:0 root htb default 2 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 10Mbit ceil 10Mbit parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 10kbit ceil 100Mbit HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change. <7>htb*g j=1014xxxxx HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change. <7>htb*g j=1014xxxxx HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change.

Bernard Łabno wrote: > Hello, > What does this line mean : > > HTB: quantum of class 10200 is small. Consider r2q change. > > > And how should I fix it ? I have dsl 1mb connection and 2 cards > (realtek-8139C and realtek-8100B/8139D) > > Could the above line cause this ? : > NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out > eth0: Transmit timeout, status 0c 0005

Hi, I have this message in my syslog: HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change. I don''t know why it''s there. I think all my setup is right. I am shaping traffic from my web server. It lives at three IP addresses, first is fast (and most important - aaa.bbb.ccc.1), second slower (aaa.bbb.ccc.2), third slowest (aaa.bbb.ccc.3). Total bandwidth is 2700kBps. Other

Hi, I''m getting this warning/error in /var/log/messages: May 26 18:21:05 mail kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10010 is small. Consider r2q change. Its a big deal? What should I do? Many thanks Oliver -- Oliver Schulze L. <oliver@samera.com.py>

Salut lartc (lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl), 18:12:52 kernel HTB init, kernel part version 3.10 18:12:52 kernel HTB: quantum of class 100001 is small. Consider r2q change. 18:12:52 kernel HTB: quantum of class 100002 is small. Consider r2q change. 18:12:52 kernel HTB: quantum of class 100003 is small. Consider r2q change. 18:12:52 kernel HTB: quantum of class 100004 is small. Consider r2q change.

I did chmod -R 777 /var/lib/dovecot and it worked. I just need to figure out what the correct setting are. Thanks everyone //Ger ----------------original message----------------- From:Ger Hooton Scoil Chro? ?osa Blarney [ghooton at scins.ie ] To:Robert Moskowitz [rgm at htt-consult.com ], chaouche yacine [yacinechaouche at yahoo.com ], dovecot at dovecot.org Date:Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:05:17

Hello, I''ve installed htb3 on my simple config (htb + sfq) . Something is now complaining that quantum is too small and suggest that r2q be changed. There seems to be no documentation on this. Ideas anyone? Regards John

Hello! One simple question regaring htb2->htb3 way. I''m using 2.4.25 kernel with tc3 from Devik''s site, RH9. My data flow is about 100Mbit duplex and is subject to grow, so I''m creating root class with 200Mbit rate, with r2q=10, quantum = rate/r2q, and 1500 < quantum < 200000 (sch_htb.c) with such r2q my default shaping window will be from 120Kbit to 16Mbit,

Hello Stef, I am working on a Bandwidth management project as part of my college curriculum.I am running TCNG 10-b but I am not able to classify packets based on MAC address using tcng, so I am running tc commands in /tcng/bin and they are working. But is there a way out to classify packets based on MAC address using TCNG. And, I am successful in throttling down the Bandwidth to 8kbit

Hello again, I need to change the R2Q for my script, as setting the quantum manually for each class is painful. Can you tell me exactly where to set R2Q = x? I get syntax errors all the time. Should it be specified for each class? I do not know where to place this setting... Thanks in advance, Vlad Mihai

Hello again, I need to change the R2Q for my script, as setting the quantum manually for each class is painful. Can you tell me exactly where to set R2Q = x? I get syntax errors all the time. Should it be specified for each class? I do not know where to place this setting... Thanks in advance, Vlad Mihai _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list /

Hi All, I cannot get the sieve_before to work. I have dovecot & sieve installed on Debian 7 as follows /etc/dovecot/conf.d/90-sieve.conf : plugin { # The path to the user's main active script. If ManageSieve is used, this the # location of the symbolic link controlled by ManageSieve. sieve = ~/.dovecot.sieve # The default Sieve script when the user has none. This is a path to a

Hi... I''m working with HTB, and have a question... what happen if I create a class of "8kbit" ?? I get a log : "HTB: quantum of class .... is small. Consider r2q change" but, my r2q=1 I can''t reduce that variable... how must I procced ? Thank you! mac _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

Hi, im using this script to shape traffic as I want..i get this log on the kernel Log: HTB: quantum of class 10020 is big. Consider r2q change. HTB init, kernel part version 3.13 HTB init, kernel part version 3.13 How worryed should I be :) ??? Thanks people!? #!/bin/bash -x fast_mark=1 ultra_fast_mark=2 slow_mark=3 interfaz_externa="eth1"

Hi everyone, My HTB script is showing me those "r2q change" warnings. I read that I should test with r2q values to gain accuracy and stop the warnings but I made some tests with r2q and with burst and I still get the warnings. Any ideas on this issue will be very helpful. The script seems to be working as the bandwidth for the IPs is being shaped. The NIC works at 100mbit and the

On 29.03.2017 13:44, Steffen Kaiser wrote: > On Tue, 28 Mar 2017, chaouche yacine wrote: > > > I would like to study how dovecot manages quota, especially how it > deals with the maildirsize file if one chooses to implement quota > according to the maildir++ specification. > > Quota is managed by the plugin, which hooks into some events. Check out > >

On 03/21/2017 09:06 AM, chaouche yacine wrote: > Hi Ger, > > sieve_before should be a path to sieve script file, not to a directory. > in your configuration, you set sieve_before to /var/lib/dovecot/sieve/before which is a directory. I don't get that reading: https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole/Sieve/Configuration Either file or directory. If a file, it searches for the svbin

Seems wrong to me too, Robert. If you put your private key inside your certificate, won't it be sent to the client along with it ? Bastian, are you using an old version of thunderbird ? googling for "SSL alert number 42" gave me two results indicating a bug in thunderbird versions 31,32 and 33. You can check these links if you wish : *