similar to: Oops on tc-graph.pl of all things

Hi, I''m trying to share internet on a LAN I''ve a linux router with SQUID (with ZPH support) + FAIRNAT The idea is: - fairness sharing internet - priorize interactive traffic - if a web object is on squid-cache (HIT), user can download it, with a rate = LAN rate I''ve: - Last Fairnat Script: www.metamorpher.de/fairnat/ - SQUID 2.5STABLE5 with ZPH patch

I reported this previously and it was verified. Is this a bug in netlink or what? Who should I report this to? Original Oops report: http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2004q2/012614.html Thanks. Linux rebecca 2.6.4 #1 Mon Sep 27 15:16:48 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Sep 27 19:02:58 rebecca kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000 Sep 27 19:02:58

Hi,lartc I used iproute-060110 with iptables1.3.4 on gentoo 2005r1 kernel 2.6.14-5. I find some error messages in system logfile: HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change. HTB: quantum of class 10010 is big. Consider r2q change. tcf_action_init_1: successfull police HTB: quantum of class 20001 is big. Consider r2q change. HTB: quantum of class 20020 is big. Consider

Hi, does anybody set up an icecast server delivering streams > 160KBit/s ? I tried that with liveice and shout but in both cases the stream stutters very much. So, I have eliminated the Net (stream to localhost), the CPU (P3/800 should be fast enough), and lame (can encode 320kBit/s 3 times faster then the wav has secs). So the Problem should be icecast. can anybody please enlight me?

> Hi, > > does anybody set up an icecast server delivering streams > 160KBit/s ? > I tried that with liveice and shout but in both cases the stream stutters > very much. So, I have eliminated the Net (stream to localhost), the CPU > (P3/800 should be fast enough), and lame (can encode 320kBit/s 3 times > faster then the wav has secs). So the Problem should be icecast.

At 11:16 2001-05-03 +0200, you wrote: >Hi, > >does anybody set up an icecast server delivering streams > 160KBit/s ? >I tried that with liveice and shout but in both cases the stream stutters >very much. So, I have eliminated the Net (stream to localhost), the CPU >(P3/800 should be fast enough), and lame (can encode 320kBit/s 3 times >faster then the wav has secs). So the

Hi guys , i am starting to "play" with qos in linux. Well , i am trying to setup an ingress filter but i do not know why it is not working. tc add qdisc dev eth0 ingress tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 1 handle 1 fw police rate 160kbit burst 256kbit drop flowid :1 After that : iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle --sport 80 -j MARK --set-mark 1 So , i think this

It seems Andreas Klauer''s fairnat has experimental support for using HTB''s MPU and overhead options. fairnat.config: # Use MPU for HTB. From the LARTC Howto on MPU: # "A zero-sized packet does not use zero bandwidth. For ethernet, no packet # uses less than 64 bytes. The Minimum Packet Unit determines the minimal # token usage for a packet." HTB_MPU=0 # HTB_MPU=64

Hi. I wrote in a reply to a mail on here recently that you can''t set mpu (minimum packet unit) on HTB as you can on CBQ. I''ve just noticed that there is a patch on devik''s site which does mpu and overhead. http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/ For dsl users mpu is, for practical purposes going to be 106 - overhead is still variable though, depending on packet size.

I work as network administrator in a dept. from a bigger company, and I want to limit traffic in the night down to 160Kbit, without disrupting comunication with peers from the entire company. To make my self clear, the company has 2 class C networks, 1 for our dept, and the other for the rest of the company. So, I want to limit traffic to the Internet, but the traffic to the other class C

Hey all. I''m trying to set up QoS using the HTB qdisc in a very basic setup, but it the example shown in the howto doesn''t seem to be working. While the packets show up in the correct classes, they appear to be completely ignoring the rates, meaning nothing gets shaped. My setup is that I''ve got a a bunch of machines behind my firewall/router: 1.2.3.1

I've had this problem encoding oggs where the output file is small, like 24kbytes for a 4 minute song (tested at 128 and 160kbit). I'm running Windows 2000 and this has happened in oggenc, oggdrop, and CDEX, though I've also been able to get good encodings with each of these. I think the only clean encodings have been .wav's that I've made myself with SoundForge or CoolEdit,

Hi, I''m new to the list. I intend to learn about some Linux Networking features to help myself and others. I''m looking to control the bandwidth in my office. Basically there are like 20 computers, a 2MB Adsl Line. And I would love to let them only use a certain amount of bandwidth. For example let every client use 20KB of internet bandwidth of the 210KB we can download

Hi, I appologise for the bad ettiquite of this, but I have tried looking for some HTB examples that would help me, and am having trouble understanding how the tc filters should work, but I can''t figure out why this isn''t working. I''ve written this script, based upon the ultimate traffic shaper at LARTC, to try and shape for me and my 3 housemates. The idea being to

This is one of my test classes: class htb 1:10 parent 1:1 prio 0 quantum 2048 rate 160Kbit ceil 400Kbit burst 1803b/8 mpu 0b cburst 2111b/8 mpu 0b level 0 Q1: where does "level 0" stand for? Q2: where does this b/8 stand for? Q3: this is on a i386 platform, so timer resolution should be 10mS. According to the doc the minimal burst should be 10mS*160Kbit=1600. Why is it 1803? Q4: I

Hi All, Please to advice me. I become crazy because i cannot find where can be problem. Obviously i miss something, but what ? I have Linux router for traffic control / ~400 users , 100 mbit bandwidth / . evereting was great until i try to implement IMQ for ingress shaping. Problem that i have is when i start follow iptables rule iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -j IMQ --todev 0 without

Anyone have a good way to knock my 160kbit mp3s down to 56k real time using *nix? Even if it is beta sorta working code, anyone have anything even close to fast enough to do this? matt --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org' containing only

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I've been off this list for a while now so I lost touch with ogg vorbis development. Could somebody please bring me up to date? As I take, the current RC2 release contains full 1.0 feature support (incl. channel coupling). Does this mean I can now start encoding all of my music as a ~128kbit/s ogg bitstream without fear of reduced

Hi, I''m trying to make a shaper / firewall to improve sharing of bandwidth on a ADSL (3mbit down / ½ mbit up) Since the ADSL is very asymmetric, down is unimportant, I make a ingress rate limit shaper to ensure, all shaping is at the Shaper, and not on the Router or the ISP. The Idea is then to make one HTB hierarchy and have each client (IP) filtererd and put in a child-HTB queue.

The debian vorbis-tools package is labeled version 1.0beta2-1 - does this mean that better compression for stereo has been implemented? (I forgot what the correct term for this was.) I am waiting with a couple of CD's I would have ripped and made mp3's of (I don't have a multi-cd shuttle in my laptop... ;), so that I can rather make ogg files, but I don't want to make them now and