similar to: mysql-proxy vs. acts_as_readonlyable vs. ?

I would like to use SQLRelay for database connection pooling and query- based routing with a Rails application that I am just about done with. It is my first Rails project, and I thought it might be wise to get some feedback on this before I get too far in coding it. >From what I can tell, I am going to have to write a connection adapter for ActiveRecord if I want to use SQLRelay (http://

Is anyone else using acts_as_readonlyable in production? We have been using it in production for a few months now, but only recently got a problem where 1 out of 100 inserts on one (out of 30+) tables is going to the readonly db. Anyone seen something similar? Thanks, Marc --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Dear all, in the past I have been able to access websites with data directly. For example the following code works nicely mydata <- read.table("http://www.lifetable.de/data/MPIDR/POL_2004.txt", header=TRUE) But what happens if I need a username and password (a different site)? How do I do that? Or is it not possible to this in R? I tried something like this mydata.frame <-

Hi! I'm a bit new to Samba+LDAP integration, and most likely because of that I experienced this morning something I can't fully understand. I would appreciate if someone could explain to me what was really wrong. So, our name server was unavailable this morning due to OS update. Division's Samba and LDAP services are running on same server, and Samba is using TLS in connecting to

Since there is a filesystem state, we should deal with it carefully at mount, umount and remount. - At mount, the FS state should be checked if there is error on these FS. If it does have, btrfsck is recommended. - At umount, the FS state should be saved into disk for consistency. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 47

bob@hobbes.dtcc.edu wrote: > > this samba was built on a solaris 2.5 system and was running fine on a > solaris 7 3/99 system. when i installed the solaris 7 5/99 maintenance > update something broke. > > log.smb: > > [1999/08/06 11:04:41, 1] smbd/server.c:main(628) > smbd version 2.0.5a started. > Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1992-1998 > [1999/08/06 11:36:49,

Hi! I am doing backups from a number of machines to an rsync server. For some time I was trying to come up with a solution, which would prevent users from peeking at each other's files, which are backed up. Finally, I've hacked rsync, introducing a new option "write only" for rsyncd.conf. When set to true, this option forbids the transfers from server to the client, thus solving

Hi, on AIX, mkstemp doesn't open a file with the O_LARGEFILE option, so you can't transfer files > 2GB to an AIX machine. Here is a fix: diff -c -r rsync-2.5.6.orig/syscall.c rsync-2.5.6/syscall.c *** rsync-2.5.6.orig/syscall.c Sun Jan 26 21:09:02 2003 --- rsync-2.5.6/syscall.c Wed May 14 13:55:15 2003 *************** *** 151,157 **** if (dry_run) return -1; if

Marking volatile accesses as !unordered seems excessively conservative. For instance, LLVM is not able to optimize declare void @escape(i32*) declare i32 @read_only(i32) readonly define i32 @f(i1* %c) { entry: %a = alloca i32 %b = alloca i32 call void @escape(i32* %a) call void @escape(i32* %b) %a0 = load i32, i32* %b, align 4 %lv = load volatile i32, i32* %b %a1 = load i32,

On Fri, 2023-09-22 at 07:37 -0400, Kevin Korb wrote: > So I decided to do a quick test using the Linux kernel source tree since > it has lots of files. Excellent idea using kernel sources! A lot of different files... I will use this to create indicative benchmarks for different scenarios... > ? I duplicated a tree, used 'find . -type f -exec > chmod 444 {} +' to make read

-- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -------------- next part -------------- >From 3ec1380eb6425b4f73024200817bd6b192d3b0b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard

I'm still working my way through the filters before this series will be complete, but this is enough of a start to at least get some feedback on the idea of implementing another NBD protocol extension. Eric Blake (9): server: Internal hooks for implementing NBD_CMD_CACHE plugins: Add .cache callback file, split: Implement .cache with posix_fadvise nbd: Implement NBD_CMD_CACHE

Rich pointed out that making thread_model dynamic even for plugins makes some sense, so here is the code for doing it for 'sh'. I'm less confident on how to do it for OCaml and Rust (not to mention that those allow the plugin to already compile in their model, rather than the language binding glue forcing a model). The other languages (lua, perl, python, ruby) still need to be

Dunno whether it's worthwhile, but we definitely test for it, and if his two non-volatile loads were identical, we'd definitely eliminate them in GVN. On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > Could you explain why you think it is worthwhile to optimize code involving > a volatile access? > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 6:08 PM

Some feature additions to the shell script plugin allow us to test the export flags field reasonably easily. Rich.

This version doesn't crash or cause hung processes or stuck mountpoints, so that's an improvement. Rich.

This patch is just for review. It enables FUSE support in the API via two new calls, 'guestfs_mount_local' and 'guestfs_umount_local'. FUSE turns out to be very easy to deadlock (necessitating that the machine be rebooted). Running the test from the third patch is usually an effective way to demonstrate this. However I have not yet managed to produce a simple reproducer that

v1 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-December/thread.html#00123 v2: - Document "-" instead of "script=-" and use it in the test; and verify this also works on FreeBSD; and verify that it doesn't depend on the particular behaviour of our wrapper script and should work with installed nbdkit too. - Fix handling of zero flags parameter. -

Hi, Does someone know a document which explains the TDB structure. functionalites, and format of the TDB files etc. I need to understand why some of the TDBs like messages.tdb, unexpected.tdb, brlock if not read_only, locking.tdb, session.tdb, wins.tdb are called with TDB_CLEAR_IF_FIRST tdb flags. Why some TDBs are opend with O_RDWR|O_CREAT flags viz. gencache.tdb, group_mapping.tdb,

Change hard code 3 to O_ACCMODE. it'll be more sensible. Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong at cn.fujitsu.com> --- fuse/guestmount.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/fuse/guestmount.c b/fuse/guestmount.c index bd7ba50..a9bf4e3 100644 --- a/fuse/guestmount.c +++ b/fuse/guestmount.c @@ -583,7 +583,7 @@ fg_open (const char *path, struct