similar to: generating nested resource path

I''m trying to write my first view spec; I''ve done some controller specs with integrated views, but thought that isolating the views for some of these tests might be nice. So I wrote this: > describe PlayerContainer, "show" do > > PARENT_ID = 12 > CHILD_NAME = ''Child Name'' > PARENT_NAME = ''Parent Name'' > >

Hi everyone, I am relatively new to rspec and I am running into a wall in testing my views. I have a RESTful resource Contracts with a nested resource of Line_items. I am trying to figure out how to test the "edit" form of the Line_items. What complicates this is the nested routing and how to account for it, and that there is a partial form (_form.haml) that both the edit.haml and

Hello People, (I am not good at ROR yet. This post could be very lame.) I am going playing with routes.rb. Well, pretty much any combination of mapping works, a part from: map.connect '':action/:id/:controller/'' In this case, the request is routed; however, I get: --------------------------------------- Showing app/views/inputs/start.rhtml where line #8 raised: No url can be

Thanks, first, to everyone who''s asked and answered questions on this list, and to the creators of RSpec - it is all very helpful. I''ve searched the mailing list, and had a couple 2hr googling sessions that didn''t help me find an answer. I''ve run into a problem getting my first non-trivial view spec to run. I get an error when trying to generate a link_to()

Hi -- I have a routes.rb file with the following in it: <CODE> map.resource :admin do |admin| admin.resources :users admin.resources :clients do |client| client.resources :client_properties end admin.resources :areas admin.resources :properties end </CODE> My problem is when I try to access the show or edit actions of the client_properties resource. The

Hi All, Rails 0.12.1 doesn''t seem to be able to handle requests that don''t provide the HTTP_HOST variable in my environment (apache2/fcgi). This isn''t really a huge deal in practice, but it points to an actual oversight in the code, or perhaps in my config. Thoughts? ActionView::TemplateError (undefined method `+'' for nil:NilClass) on line #1 of

Hello, I''m in troubles trying to use ''link_to_remote'' on Rails 2.1. Having this page: <h4>Editing project</h4> <% form_for(:project, :url => project_path(@project), :html => { :method => :put }) do |f| %> <p> Name <%= f.text_field :name %> Date <%= calendar_date_select :project, :target_date, :time =>

So, here''s the offending line. Note that I''m using edge rails. form_tag verifications_path(@user), :method => :post do verifications_path(@user) returns a string like "/users/3/ verifications". That eventually gets sent to url_for, which expects a hash. And then it blows up. It''s especially disconcerting since the documentation shows form_tag as

Hey ROR users, I have a small experimental web app which is for uploading files. The web app uses carrierwave, uploadify. It works fine on small size files. However, it can not handle large size files (>1G) efficiently. Then I decided using nginx upload module, it worked well on small size files after modification of codes,. But It fails on uploading large files (>1G) because of http error

Hi All, So I found a helpful web page that explained how I could use things like url_for in my mails: http://wiki.rubyonrails.com/rails/pages/HowtoUseUrlHelpersWithActionMailer However, I can''t test them properly. The problem is that when I create a controller in my unit tests and pass it into the ActionMailer, it''s not a real controller, set up as a controller is when it is

Hi guys, I was wondering if you are able to have a link_to_remote, having an image_tag and the link_to_remote has a mouseover event that updates a div. Does the image_tag need the mouseover event? I currently have: <%= link_to_remote(image_tag(@p_image.public_filename(:thumb)), :update => "big_pic", :onmouseover => {:action => :color_change, :id => @p_image.id})%>

Hopefully someone here can help me figure out why the ERB: <% form_for(@fund, :url => {:host => PRIVATE_HOST}, :html => {:class => ''fund'', :multipart => true}) do |f| %> raises an error in my specs: No route matches {:action=>"index"} but works fine in my app and generates the following, desired HTML: <form

Hi guys, I am new to this list and thought i''d say hello. I am using facebooker on a new project and so far I am really pleased with it. I saw that some users are having woes with the url_rewriter breaking urls for paths outside of the facebook canvas (i.e. your site supports both facebook and non-facebook users). I don''t have a prefect answer for this but I wrote a

Hi! It''s not really a big deal, because the workaround is easy, but I don''t really know if it''s a bug or a feature. Maybe someone can have a look on that. I have a problem with creating links within components. The scenario ============ My "index" action renders a "list" component by calling: <div id="list"> <%=

Whenever I try to pass an options hash to the link_to method (or url_for, or button_to) I get this error: undefined method `rewrite'' for []:ActionController::Routing::PathSegment::Result The trace ends with /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.13.2/lib/action_controller/base.rb:522:in `url_for''

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:1407 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1407.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: ea8bd669e4ddf4b0638663c1e27aa01fbc64be921f6c09f1afd396d830608927 libipa_hbac-1.13.3-22.el6_8.4.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2017:2505 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:2505 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: a13401b5a68e93e194fa862f3502ad7c93976151e61df31543612279904316d4 libipa_hbac-1.13.3-57.el6_9.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2018:0510 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:0510 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 7e2059795a5bc50e3b70cdb457d4daebc5de5384127e15e96b9185b2ca6cbd9c libipa_hbac-1.13.3-58.el6_9.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2019:0063 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0063 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: b22a1737a4e5697e44b3151c970a3433097410cf34039258b8fcfbfe8d1dc95b libipa_hbac-1.13.3-60.el6_10.2.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2017:0302 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017-0302.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 62c9102db1c4c156a2d187b9e34bcd225b5fb5a581042aff538fa47b853b9456 libipa_hbac-1.13.3-22.el6_8.6.i686.rpm