similar to: HTB MPU

OK, here it is. Near perfect bandwidth calculation for ADSL users. Patch iproute2 with the HTB stuff and then this: It''s still a hack (as far as I can tell) because we are patching the rates tables, and hence I think it is only loosly coupled with the actual calculation of bytes in each bucket. However, it works very nicely for me! I have only been lightly testing with

I have been trying to optimise my ADSL connections for VOIP. Funny things were happening - for example increasing the ping packet size by 50% had no effect, but then adding one byte had a major effect. It took me a while to figure out that I was seeing the effects of the fixed ATM cell size. This is probably obvious to some of you. For the rest: ADSL uses ATM as its transport. An ATM

Guys Considering the festive season is upon us, thanks to everyone contributing to the list and helping all the readers with your great input! I don''t want to mention names, I''ll most certainly leave someone out. With this mail I''d like to test some theory on bandwidth management, with my own successes and failures during the past year. Sharing a link between 200

I know there is that handy patch available to very efficiently use ATM bandwidth, but I was wondering what the best values to use with a non-patched iproute2 would be. Anyone here care to check my logic in coming up with these numbers and perhaps suggest better values? My transmit speed is 768kbps per ADSL line (I have two). This is the HTB shaping I do on the interface (logic used for this

I posted earlier when I noticed that htb was releasing packets in pairs, even though my burst/quantums were 1 pkt. To fix I set HTB_HYSTERESIS 0 in net/sched/sch_htb.c . This gives a noticable gain in upstream worst case latency, for me with 256kbit/s up I used to see +90 sometimes, now it''s +45. For the many who have 128 up it should limit them to +90 rather than +180. Andy.

This is one of my test classes: class htb 1:10 parent 1:1 prio 0 quantum 2048 rate 160Kbit ceil 400Kbit burst 1803b/8 mpu 0b cburst 2111b/8 mpu 0b level 0 Q1: where does "level 0" stand for? Q2: where does this b/8 stand for? Q3: this is on a i386 platform, so timer resolution should be 10mS. According to the doc the minimal burst should be 10mS*160Kbit=1600. Why is it 1803? Q4: I

It seems Andreas Klauer''s fairnat has experimental support for using HTB''s MPU and overhead options. fairnat.config: # Use MPU for HTB. From the LARTC Howto on MPU: # "A zero-sized packet does not use zero bandwidth. For ethernet, no packet # uses less than 64 bytes. The Minimum Packet Unit determines the minimal # token usage for a packet." HTB_MPU=0 # HTB_MPU=64

Hello there! Yesterday I started my experiments with HTB. I configured it this way: 1: root HTB qdisc | 1:1 HTB class rate 1000kbit | /-------+------\ 1:40 1:50 1:60 user1 user2 user3 rate 333 & ceil 1000 for everyone. User2 is disconnected and user1 and user3 are downloading. For all the time (t1-t5) there are ONLY these two users downloading! HTB should give

Hi I''m using wondershaper like script. But noticed imperfect scheduling. By googling, I found some patches that takes the aal5 atm overhead in the scheduling algorithms. http://www.adsl-optimizer.dk/ADSL-optimizer/ Before trying it, has anyone tried these patches? they apply on 2.4.29 kernel and 2.6.9 TC. I use centos4 with a 2.6 kernel, so I can''t try these easily. Thanks

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I''m using HTB to shape my outgoing traffic over a ADSL-link with PPPoE with a nominal bandwidth of 128kbit/s. My goal is to favour small packets like ACKs and interactive services like ssh; in other words, I want to achieve low lantency. If there are some big packets going over the wire, everything works fine. But if there are

Hey all. I''m trying to set up QoS using the HTB qdisc in a very basic setup, but it the example shown in the howto doesn''t seem to be working. While the packets show up in the correct classes, they appear to be completely ignoring the rates, meaning nothing gets shaped. My setup is that I''ve got a a bunch of machines behind my firewall/router: 1.2.3.1

Hello, I have a serious problem with HTB which I wasn''t able to solve myself. I run a masquerading router with ppp0 as interface to the Internet. Three clients need to share a downstream of 1 MBit, which I want to divide with tc. When I see a packet being forwarded to one of these clients, I give it the appropriate unique mark: iptables -t mangle -A FORWARD -d 192.168.34.141 -j MARK

Hello! I need to switch from htb2 to htb3, because of speed issues (for me, htb2 is unable to handle more then 100mbit duplex with ~550 classes), kernel profiling shows htb_dequeue_prio at 1st place with 3x isolation. So, I''ve moved from 2.4.19 to 2.4.25 kernel (hi-pac for classification/marking and htb3 for queueing), and traffic rate drop from 100 to 20mbit. What can be wrong? The

Hi everyone. I''m new to this list and I have some questions regarding HTB class. I was trying to see how tc sets the parameters for HTB, but really couldnt understand them. So, I thought that I might ask the wizards. It''s mainly from the source code. 1. What is the cell_log ? (its everywhere in the code) 2. Why does htb calculate its burst(buffer) with tc_xmit_time() ? Is

//Just to not forget eth0 is WAN and eth1 is LAN . The box is NATing my lan. I configured tcng to shape both download and upload and i got connection loss again. Maybe it is my script fault or it is something bad with packets marking . this is how i mark outgoing packets iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p tcp -s 192.168.1.23 -j MARK --set-mark $ip and this part of my script which is intented

Hello, 1. I currently have a 128kbps cable link to the internet..and I''m sharing this connection with others. I''ve made the following script(for alocating bandwidth depending on the services used: browsing, squid, games like counter-strike, icmp, ssh), which unfortunately isn''t working very well as the response times I''m getting upon pinging the server

Hi, I''m trying to configure QoS on my linux in the following manner: I have a main link with 64K, so I divided it in 3 classes of 18K, 14K and 9K with an excess (not used for classified traffic, just to be shared) of 23K. This excess should be distributed proportonally among the 3 classes, that is, the class that has more rate should borrow more bandwidth. What is happening is

Sorry I pressed the wrong key and sent the message too early... > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Philipp Leusmann [mailto:philipp.leusmann@rwth-aachen.de] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. November 2006 12:53 > An: ''lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl'' > Betreff: Why did I need strange ceiling settings? > > Hi all, > > I recently installed traffic shaping on my

What''s going on here? I''m spewing UDP traffic at this thing, and it is exceeding the ceil. Anyone know how to fix this? class htb 1:613 parent 1:5 leaf 613: prio 6 quantum 2560 rate 20480bit ceil 103360bit burst 15Kb/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 1728b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b level 0 Sent 16591370 bytes 4159 pkt (dropped 39449, overlimits 0 requeues 0) rate 412384bit 6pps backlog 0b

Hi all, this is really not really very easy to understand, or, to get in. Well, I''ve the following configuration on the router box: LAN - interface: eth0 - network: 192.168.2.5/24 - bandwidth: 100Mbit/s INET interface - interface: ppp0 - network: .dynamic.ip./0 - bandwidth: DOWN=1536kbit/s and UP=256kbit/s the LAN interface is to serve 6 other clients with internet and