similar to: ingress policy filter for variable rate

Hi ! I wanted to shape my analog modem connection so I took these two lines from the ''wondershaper'' script: tc qdisc add dev $DEV handle ffff: ingress #tc filter add dev $DEV parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 u32 match ip \ src 0.0.0.0/0 police rate ${DOWNLINK} burst 10k drop flowid :1 with DEV=ppp0 and DOWNLINK=24kbit. But, when I activate it, nothing comes back from the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all! when I activate wondershaper on my dsl connection (pppoa vc mux), i get three errors: # sh -x /usr/sbin/wshaper ppp0 + /usr/sbin/xmlstarter setenv tc_downlink + DOWNLINK= + /usr/sbin/xmlstarter setenv tc_uplink + UPLINK= + [ -z ] + cat /proc/avalanche/avsar_modem_stats + grep Connection Rate + awk {printf("%d", $8)} +

Hello everyone ! I''m new to the list :-). So I''ll tell you: I''m Eduardo Robles Elvira aka Edulix, a young student from the south of Spain. I''ve developed a simple project for local pc bandwidth shaping called Edulix Shaper script [1]. It''s based on the Wondershaper. I have it mostly finnished and debugged; I have only a final problem: Is it

Hello all, I have browsed archives and real all available HOWTOs, but I still have a few doubts. My set up is a router, as below. LAN(100MB)-------------(eth1)Linux-Router(eth0)---------------WAN(2MB/512) My aim is to cotrol both uplink and downlink bandwidth. For uplink control, I will use HTB on WAN interface. For downlink, I plan to attach HTB on LAN interface(both egress/outgoing). No

Hi all, ive got 2 internet connections set up via the nano howto (which are working great) and we are running NAT. Was looking in to qos mainly to stop large http downloads/ftp downloads from hogging the line so that browsing for other users doesnt slow to a crawl, but if the line is free and no one is doing anything then for it to use the available bandwith. The wondershaper sounded exactly what

hi there, this is my 1st message in the list. I would like to use this wondershaper.htb to limit the bandwith usage at home. My kernel config is: # QoS and/or fair queueing # CONFIG_NET_SCHED=y CONFIG_NET_SCH_CBQ=y CONFIG_NET_SCH_HTB=y CONFIG_NET_SCH_CSZ=y CONFIG_NET_SCH_HFSC=y CONFIG_NET_SCH_PRIO=y CONFIG_NET_SCH_RED=y CONFIG_NET_SCH_SFQ=y CONFIG_NET_SCH_TEQL=y CONFIG_NET_SCH_TBF=y

Hi, all I''ve got problems with tc qdisc ingress. I''m using vanillia kernel 2.6.14.4 patched with http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/routes-2.6.14-12.diff, and iproute2-2.6.14-051107. i am using ingress to limit incoming traffic : (DEV is eth1 / DOWNLINK is 7700) # attach ingress policer: tc qdisc add dev $DEV handle ffff: ingress # filter *everything* to it (0.0.0.0/0), drop everything

I''m trying to shape traffic on a Devil-Linux box. This note was originally sent to their maillist, because the LARTC list appears to have been down for the past few days. My mailbox was just flooded with a half dozen or so confirmation requests in response to my repeated attempts to subscribe to this list. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: drew einhorn

I tried installing the WonderShaper on my internal link, mostly to get the SFQ installed. I set uplink and downlink to 100000 to match the link speed and changed the bandwidth on the cbq line to 100mbit. This killed transfer speed *to* the box, knocking it from 30-40 Mbps down to about 800 kbps. Commenting out just the ingress control restored the speed. What about the ingress policer would do

Hello Thilo, What did you find superior with CBQ-wondershaper over HTB-wondershaper? We have not been using wondershaper specifically but our simple tests so far seem to show that htb is much easier to configure for a given target shape (i.,e accurate) compared to CBQ. Torsten -----Original Message----- From: Thilo Schulz [mailto:arny@ats.s.bawue.de] Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 8:55 AM To:

Hi ! I have a 56k modem internet connection and I want to control the BW of ftp downloads. But when I run the following script, my downloads are simply stopped (and they resume if I clear the rules): ----------------- #!/bin/sh DEV=ppp0 DOWNLINK=14kbit /sbin/ipchains -A input -i $DEV -p tcp -s 0/0 ftp-data -m 1 tc qdisc del dev $DEV root 2> /dev/null > /dev/null tc qdisc del dev $DEV

Hello list! In am stuck in getting the wondershaper script working. The last line of the script (tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 u32 match ip src 0.0.0.0/0 police rate 1800kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1) produces the following error: RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument Could somebody please give me a hint on how to fix this? Regards, borghart

Hi, I have a typical configuration for my firewall/gateway box: single network card, with a pppoe connection to the DSL modem. I''m already successfully shaping the uplink (how come that the wondershaper.htb doesn''t use the ceil parameter? It should implement bandwidth borrowing!) but i found the ingress policy a little bit rough. I''d like to keep the traffic categories

I have a setup where I have three NIC in a Debian box. I have eth1 conected to internet and eth0 NAT''ed to 192.168.1.1. eth1 and eth2 are bridged together, given ip 192.168.122.2. What I want to achieve is to perform traffic shaping on the bridge as well as prioritizing the traffic from eth0 very low. (This is from trental flat ...) However it seems that I am unable to perform thhe

Hi all. Since I move on to 2.6 kernel , filter ingress policy based on nfmark won´t work. Sorry for my english. Simple example: iptables -t mangle -I PREROUTING -j MARK --set-mark 1 ${QDISC_ADD} handle ffff: ingress ${FILTER_ADD} parent ffff: protocol ip prio 100 handle 1 fw \ police rate 128Kbit burst 10k drop flowid 2:11 # tc -s -d qdisc ls dev eth0 qdisc ingress ffff: ----------------

Hi I''m looking for a quick recipe for a newbie to control http traffic in my linux gw. My internet is overloaded already and vpn external clients are experiencing troubles (disconnecting in peak hours). Any suggestions ? Regards Guillermo Caracas/Venezuela On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 14:40, lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl wrote: > Send LARTC mailing list submissions to >

[I sent this earlier but I guess the list is subscriber-only?] I just set up wondershaper, it has a simple filter on the downstream direction to limit the bandwidth usage: tc qdisc add dev $DEV handle ffff: ingress tc filter add dev $DEV parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 u32 match ip src \ 0.0.0.0/0 police rate ${DOWNLINK}kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1 This is effective but is there any way to

Hi all, Whenever I start up TC and implement traffic policing using ingress, I get logs that goes something like this: Classifier actions preferred over ingress. What does that mean?? This are the relevent lines : tc qdisc add dev $DEV handle ffff: ingress tc filter add dev $DEV parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 u32 match ip src 0.0.0.0/0 police rate ${DOWNLINK}kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1

Hi, I''m really new to traffic shaping and try to implement the wshaper.htb script. I have a linux box that serves as vdr, mldonkey, samba, apache and mailserver (imap), connected to my LAN with 100mbit. I''m connected to the inet via adsl with a hardware router/firewall, got 384k downlink 64k uplink. When I have mldonkey running, imap (via Outlook) gets *very* slow (mails with

Hello one more time, As others seem to already asked without reply, I''m getting lower speed rates than specified via ingress. How do I know. Because I have this in my script: tc qdisc add dev $DEV handle ffff: ingress # Filter intranet traffic, so fit it to intranet speed tc filter add dev $DEV parent ffff: protocol ip prio 10 u32 \ match ip src $Q_2_HOSTS \ match ip dst