Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "finder_sql patch problem"
2006 Feb 28
3
[AR] #{id} namespace visibility used in finder_sql
Dears,
[Rails 1.0.0]
I''m working with a legacy schema, and around my 20+ models i''ve used
some AR constructs.
They are based on a finder_sql doing some dirty sql and using #{id}
from the ''pivot'' model for extracting data in other tables.
like :
class Division < ActiveRecord::Base
set_table_name "legacy_division"
set_primary_key
2006 Oct 30
2
It this possible: finder_sql-like behavior for belongs_to?
Guys,
I have a need to support as has_many/belongs_to relationship on a
legacy(kind of) schema. The reason I say kind of is that the schema does
have "id" columns that are used in many associations, but this particular
has_many/belongs_to association needs to support different ones.
I''ve attached to code at the end of this email. Suffice it to say I need to
use the standard
2005 Dec 27
3
Trouble combining :has_many, :finder_sql and :conditions to create a sub-search
I''m sure there''s something right under my nose that I''m missing. I
have two tables with two parallel one-to-many relationships. I wish to
use the :finder_sql parameter to essentially ''or'' the two foreign
keys.
What isn''t working for me is performing a ''sub-search''.
Let''s say the tables are "stores" and
2006 Jan 06
1
has_many with :finder_sql question
hi all,
I have a Class, Client, which has_many projects (Project class). the
projects depend on a session_id variable, however. So the question
is, how can I do the following:
has_many :projects,
:finder_sql => "SELECT p.* FROM projects p INNER JOIN
projects_users pu ON pu.project_id = p.id WHERE pu.user_id =
#{session[:user_id]}"
The problem is that I need to filter a
2006 Aug 15
2
has_many + finder_sql & :include
Hello,
In a model I have:
has_many :things, :finder_sql => '' select * from other_things '' +
'' where id = #{id} ''
When I do MyClass.find(:all, :include => :things) I get a weird error:
from
c:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-1.14.4/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract_adapter.rb:120:in
2005 Dec 30
5
HABTM with finder_sql problem (Rails bug?)
I''m building an app that needs i18n support across the entire database
(i.e. localized attributes). In order to do this I''ve created a
special HABTM join table that can be associated with _any_ other
table:
create table language_strings (
for_table varchar(255) not null,
foreign_id int not null,
language_id varchar(5) not null,
attr_name varchar(255) not null,
value text
2006 Jun 09
1
finder_sql issue with has_many :through
I have an inner join query that Action Record can''t seem to pull off
conventionally, so I''m trying to use :finder_sql to utilize an sql query
that works beautifully in SQL. The problem is, when I try to call the
method, I get the following:
private method `gsub'' called for #<Array:0x267de04>
Here is my has_many code:
has_many :mod_privileges,
2006 Jan 17
15
legacy database and finder_sql nightmare!
This is my first rails app with a legacy database and I''m having a
terrible time getting the models set up correctly. I have an order
table that has a primary field named order_number. I have a name table
with a primary of item_number. These two tables are liked by the
item_number and the order_number, but not as you might think. If the
order_number is 2500, then each entry in
2007 Mar 21
1
Eager Loading with custom :finder_sql
Is there any way to do eager loading when using custom :finder_sql ?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
2006 Jan 19
7
bug in has_many count?
I can submit a patch, but wanted to confirm I''m looking at this right...
The docs indicate that if you specify a has_many association with
:finder_sql, but no :counter_sql, it constructs the appropriate counter
sql by substituting the SELECT clause.
But has_many_association.rb doesn''t seem to do that -- it just passes
Base#count_by_sql the finder_sql, which doesn''t
2005 Dec 27
0
How do I combine :finder_sql and :conditions to perform a sub-search on a custom has_many relationship?
I''m sure there''s something right under my nose that I''m missing.
I have two tables with two parallel one-to-many relationships. I wish
to use the :finder_sql parameter to essentially ''or'' the two foreign
keys.
What isn''t working for me is performing a ''sub-search''.
Let''s say the tables are "stores" and
2010 Jan 25
0
has_many, :finder_sql, setting attributes
Hi all,
My question is somewhat complicated, but bear with me. My project has a
number of models: User, Program, and Team. Users belong to multiple
Programs. Programs have multiple teams, but Teams belong to one
program. For each Program a User belongs to, he can belong to multiple
Teams. (Think of this in an athletic context where users are athletes,
programs are universities). So my
2006 Aug 13
1
Is :finder_sql using #{id} broken?
Hi All,
It seems that :finder_sql in a HABTM association only interprets a
single quoted #{id} the first time through a query. I see examples
of this being used in a few places (though with has_many) and I don''t
really see how to use :finder_sql without a #{id}.
Am I missing something or is this just broken?
--
Paul Haddad (paul.haddad@gmail.com paul@pth.com)
2006 Jul 24
1
has_many + finder_sql
from the api I got:
<pre>
has_many :subscribers, :class_name => "Person", :finder_sql =>
''SELECT DISTINCT people.* '' +
''FROM people p, post_subscriptions ps '' +
''WHERE ps.post_id = #{id} AND ps.person_id = p.id '' +
''ORDER BY p.first_name''
</pre>
I would like to pass in the
2006 Mar 14
4
has_one
I''ve got an order model that stores order data.
One piece of data is a credit card type, which is a digit 1,2 or 3.
I have a cardType model that has an id, shortName and LongName for the
credit card merchant (visa, mastercard, amex).
I want to be able to say: order.cardType.shortName, but can''t seem to
get has_one working. It works with has_many and a finder_sql statement
on
2006 Feb 13
0
has_many finder_sql #{id} single/double quotes voodoo
I never would have figured this out in many moons:
has_many :subscribers, :class_name => "Person",
:finder_sql =>
''SELECT DISTINCT people.* '' +
''FROM people p, post_subscriptions ps '' +
''WHERE ps.post_id = #{id} AND ps.person_id =
p.id '' +
''ORDER BY p.first_name''
Variable
2011 Sep 27
0
has_many with :finder_sql returns [nil]?
Is it supposed to do that? I find it very confusing.
AR 3.0.10
class Unit
has_many :units, :finder_sql => proc {
"SELECT * FROM `#{table_name}` WHERE `location_id`=#{id} AND
`location_type`=#{Location::UNIT}" }
end
Both should return []. However...
>> Unit.first.units.find([1000000])
[2011-09-27 10:05:11|main|debug] Unit Load (4.0ms) SELECT `units`.*
FROM `units`
2006 Mar 10
4
problem when looping through habtm children in a view
I have this code in a view:
<% for topic in @topics %>
<%= topic.id %> <%= topic.dr_title %><br/>
<ul>
<% for doc in topic.child_documents %>
<%= doc.dr_title %><br/>
<% doc = nil %>
<% end %>
</ul>
<% end %>
Though the topic titles and IDs display correctly,
2006 Jan 18
3
legacy database on remote host
I''m getting this error in webrick then it crashes leaving nothing in the
log.
ruby: symbol lookup error:
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mysql-2.7/lib/mysql.so: undefined symbol:
mysql_sqlstate
Here is the standard query I would normally write to get the data.
select * from child,parent
where CONCAT(SUBSTRING(child.item_number,1,14,''00'') =
parent.order_number and
2005 Sep 10
4
has_too_many
Assuming you have Person that has_many :messages, what will it happen if it
has 10000 messages?
Will rails attempt to initialize @person.messages with 10000 rows from
database? If that is the case, is combining finder_sql and counter_sql the
common practice to avoid this?
Bogdan
_______________________________________________
Rails mailing list