similar to: multipath routing question

I have a gentoo 2.6.14 box with 4 nics, LAN/DMZ/PUB1/PUB2 LAN and DMZ have a 1918 /22 each, PUB1 and PUB2 have a /29 each of which 5 ips are assigned. Using the mangle table, I give all packets a mark (according to local policies) in the range 1-10. Using ip rule, i pass marks 1-5 through the pub1 route table, and marks 6-10 through the pub2 routing table. Using the nat table, I SNAT to one

Hi, I''ve been trying to setup 2 DSL links in the office, both on the same firewall/router/gateway. the firewall is running kernel 2.6.11 (custom built on debian). this is the network diagram: 150.101.124.y/29 (internode''s gw) | | |150.101.124.x/29 (eth2)

Hello newsgroup, I hope somebody with more routing experience then me can help me with the problem I have. The setup is as described below. A dual internet provider routing, multiple local area networks, and a dmz network with one public and one private ip range. I followed the instructions at lartc.org, and so far everything is working. The default route is via

Firstly I don''t think this is a shorewall problem, but I suspect shorewall might be able to solve it for me. I''ve posted this so far at http://mandrakeusers.org/index.php?showtopic=18942 I''ve stumble upon a problem that has me stumped I have a multipath router using 2.6.8.1 with patches from here http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#routes basic setup: ___ ISP1

Hello Shorewall list, I''m a happy Shorewall user since a few years now and everything works fine for me except one thing that I try to implement since a week, the multi-isp. I''ve downloaded the 2.4.0 Stable release yesterday and tried the RC2 since a week. My config is a Debian running a kernel 2.4.27 home made with the CONNMARK.diff patch applied I''m using 2 ISP,

Hi folks, sorry for my bad english, but I am not a native speaker. I want to setup a virtual firewall-host in a UML-Session. I''m using Kernel 2.4.27-um1 and shorewall 2.2.2-2 from Debian sarge. I have 4 nic''s in my System: eth0 -> localnet 0 eth1 -> localnet 1 eth2 -> wlan eth3 -> DSL/ppp0 I''m using four bridges br0,br1,br2,br3. The UML firewall host is

Hi, I have been a shorewall user for a long time now, and it has been working flawlessly. I have now changed ISP and my new DSL connection is PPPoE. My setup is as follows: internet <--------> 3com812 Officeconnect (bridge mode) <----> eth0 <-------> linux box <----> eth1, eth2, eth3, eth4 <---> other internal networks Things are working fine, but the link is

Hello, I have set up a multipath gateway. System is a linux 2.4.29 kernel, iproute 20010824, iptables 1.2.11. here is the setup: firewall:/# ip rule 0: from all lookup local 100: from all lookup main 152: from all fwmark 10 lookup wan1 153: from all fwmark 20 lookup wan2 201: from 213.223.96.121 lookup wan1 202: from 82.236.230.217 lookup wan2 1000: from

I have a private lan that is connected to the world via 3 dsl lines. I put up a linux box that handles all the dsl lines, lan gateway and all is working well...until...one of the dsl lines goes down. My routing table is: x.x.x.x dev ppp0 proto kernel scope link src x.x.x.x x.x.x.x dev ppp1 proto kernel scope link src x.x.x.x x.x.x.x dev ppp2 proto kernel scope link src x.x.x.x

Hello. I have the problem that I have two gateways on the same subnet, 80.237.244.1 and 80.237.244.33. Both gateways are 100 MBit cards, so I have 2 times 100 MBit to the Internet. The NIC in the server is a gigabit-card, so this card is easy able to use both gateways for outgoing traffic. Now I just want to use both gateways for my outgoing traffic but no matter what I do, it doesnt work. I

Ok folks, here goes.. I have been boggling with a problem for the past week, and still haven''t found a solution.. I''m trying to route traffic from two providers through a Linux machine. But that is not the problem. The ISP''s have provided me with a WAN IP class for both of the lines, to be routed into a DMZ where the machines a to respond to their respective

Hello, I''m receiving this error while restarting/starting Shorewall : Processing /etc/shorewall/init ... WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan20 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan10 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan30 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan50 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan100 My route -n

I am having a little trouble getting my head around this so any help would be appreciated. I have just signed up a new service and have been allocated the following subnet which gives me 30 usable IP addresses. 210.15.xxx.192/27 The connection is made via pppoe which works fine and the connection creates ppp0 and assigns 210.15.xxx.193. Now I want to use 4 IP''s in a DMZ and the reset

Hi all, I have the following configuration: _______ +------------+ / diginet link | | | +-------------+ Provider 1 +------- __ | | | / ___/ \_

Hi, I have a PPPoE server running on a linux box that accepts multiple PPPoE sessions from clients. I'd like to bridge each of the sessions together so that it looks like just one interface. Below is a diagram: br0 | ------------------------------- | | | | ppp0 ppp1 eth3 ppp3 I've read that anything can be bridge as long as MTU is the same.

Hello, We''ve been using Xen on several servers with direct-attached storage for a number of years. Now we''re looking to buy more Xen servers and re-purpose two of the older ones as SANs to hold the domU filesystems, in order to achieve redundancy and live migration ability. I''m looking for comments on our proposed design. SAN 1 - existing server w/ 4 GB, 2x

Previously I attempted load balancing between 3 interfaces with limited bandwidth but a common gateway with much more bandwidth using QoS and teql. This had little to know luck because routes never seemed to come out right. Someone pointed me in the direction of http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt to try and set up a multipath route instead. After setting this up it seems that all of the routes are

Hello, I''m trying to setup an 8 port wan configuration (pptp+pppoe) with one vlan trunk. My internal networks are : LAN(eth9): 10.0.0.0/16 VLAN10(eth9) 10.10.0.0/24 VLAN20(eth9) 10.20.0.0/24 VLAN30(eth9) 10.30.0.0/24 VLAN100(eth9) 10.100.0.0/24 I would like to post my configuration here since i don''t success to do the following: 1. Communicate between VLANxx to LAN

First of all i wanna thanks Christoph Simon for the support. Only after his reply to my email i could see the real solution to the problem (Valeu mesmo cara... me ajudou pra caramba! Fico te devendo essa!) :) Here is what i learned in a month of research: I tried A LOT of things to do load balance, including the one at LARTC homepage. The only tutorial that REALLY works in my case is the

Hí everybody, you have a nice day. I am configuring accounting in shorewall /etc/shorewall/accounting and the traffic between eth0 (local network)1, eth2(local network2) and eth3(local network3) &lt;--&gt; eth1(ip public network), works fine. I make the accounting because y want to control the remote vpn access(pptpd) throught shorewall. Which is the way to control vpn /ip/access in