similar to: Managed switch? | PRIO chain

>From Slashdot http://slashdot.org/articles/05/07/21/0135213.shtml?tid=126&tid=95 : "One of the points made is that there is sometimes no way to tell the location of a VOIP phone, which is a problem if you are unable to talk. How about if the VOIP app. insisted that you record a 30 second emergency message (stating your location/name/whatever) when being installed and then watched

The Centos website talks about a SPARC release, how is this coming on? and is there an approximate release date? Thanks Dean Plant

Hi, all, according to the following HTML, http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.qdisc.classful.html section 9.5.3.1. PRIO parameters & usage: it says: "If you do not provide tc filters to classify traffic, the PRIO qdisc looks at the TC_PRIO priority to decide how to enqueue traffic." So my understanding is that the Priomap will be consulted to classify the packet. However, I see the

Hello, I''d like to build a 4 class prio system based on mark (until now no problem), but with a limited bandwidth. I have configured my eth* to be 10mbit full duplex, and I''d like to limit the bandwidth to 1mbit. I managed to do it with a policy filter matching all the traffic, but I can redirect it into only one class, so all my prio classes are useless. I also tried to limit

Is there anyway to actually see packet stats or that packets are for sure going into a prio queue with TC? I can see all the HTB stats but the prio classes just list as being there...would like more information Basically I have the following setup DSMARK | HTB - (tcindex filter on TOS) | Prio (u32 filter on TOS) Thanks Jon Flechsenhaar Boeing WNW Team Network Services

Having a problem with classid and prio and position. Wondering if someone could help? Below I have pasted a part of my current rules, now it consists of one chain and two pipes. If they both use 60Kbit which one would get priority? Would it be the one with the better prio or the one with the lower classid or would it be the one which is first on the list? /sbin/tc class add dev eth1 parent

Hi, I try to use the PRIO scheduler on a 2.6.17 kernel. I use a simple configuration : $TC qdisc add dev $dev root handle 1: prio bands 2 priomap 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $TC qdisc add dev $dev parent 1:1 handle 10:0 sfq perturb10 $TC qdisc add dev $dev parent 1:2 handle 20:0 sfq perturb 10 And i put filters for my trafic, the 2 streams are correctly put in each

Hello, I''m using HTB and would like to ask is it correct to put "PRIO" on non-leaf classes ? I know that on leaf classes it''s correct and determines how the excess bandwidth is distributed among non-leaf classes. Thanks Nikolay G.K

Hello Is the prio specification in the htb class global or is it on a per class basis? A simple example: class 1:10 parent 1: class 1:130 parent 1:10 prio 3 class 1:170 parent 1:10 prio 7 class 1:171 parent 1:170 prio 1 class 1:172 parent 1:170 prio 2 Which class will get excessive bandwidth first? 130 or 171/172? Thanks.

Hi, below are some test results from implementing a prio qdisc ''that is also below''. The qdisc is attacted to a vlan interface for my external network. Both tests were run at the same time. The links are policed at 6.0M ''by our provider''. 192.168.70.1 --> 192.168.30.1 My question is: If using a prio qdisc should''nt the iperf run with a tos of b8 have

Hello, I am looking for an answer. I am doind some thing like a loadshare betwen two backbones. To one of them I send all p2p, msn and irc packages and to the other one I send the rest I have. The problem I am facing is about prio at tables: ip rule add fwmark 1 table 201 prio 202 This is the rule I make. This is, I thinbk, working fine. The default gateway is set into table

Hi to all! I''m studying qdisc prio but I have some problems. I want to create 3 queue (3 bands prio), each one associated to a workstation. I mark (with iptables) packets using workstation mac address and then send all packets in a particular queue. qdisc prio with handle 10: (default priomap) WS1 -> queue 10:1 WS2 -> queue 10:2 WS3 -> queue 10:3 I set it correctly (with

Good morning, I have a client that needs some shaping done. Im only familiar with the HTB qeueu and was hopeing someone could give me a few pointers if possible. I need to shape outgoing and incoming as far as possible though I don''t know if it will be possible to do so without policeing the incoming bandwidth. They have a link and their service provider allows them to burts as

Hi all, I am using htb for traffic classification. Is there a limit to the value prio can take cos when I give the following command . tc class add dev eth2 classid 1:22 parent 1:2 htb rate 500Kbit ceil 1000Kbit prio 8 and then check the output, I find that the prio of 1:22 is 7, same case for other values above 7. Thanks, Vinod C

Hi I have now my outgoing traffic shaped whith root qdisc htb (where i configure basic rate) and tc prio (as a leaf with 4 classes) where i can set priority of different kinds of traffic. It works but htb is work-conserving so packets are only delayed (when the rate is exceeded), while i want them dropped. In the case when rate is exceeded i want to drop packets with priority set to 4, then if

Hi there I have followed your disc. concerning bandwith and prio of port-traffic. What happens to for example with "ping" time, and other ports very much used for diff. pleasures, if for example you prio http and smtp? Is there any technics by the way, that netcards use when low prio-traffic gets congested, I mean technics like "back-pressure" (switch-technics I suppose)?

Hello LARTC!!!! There is a question that kills me everytime I think about it. I just love HTB and for one year since I started to work wih it I had no complains until one day. One client needs to allocate the shared bandwith , based on priorities. The HTB as everybody knows have the CEIL parameter and also PRIO which are supposed to solve the problem. Now the problem: I configure everything, rate

What is the maximum value for "prio"? It seems that for htb its maximum is 7. Is that right? R. -- ___________________________________________________________________ It''s so simple to be wise. Just think of something stupid to say and say the opposite. +------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Richard Lucassen, Utrecht

Hi! Could somebody tell me, what is difference between these two prio parameters in http://lartc.org/lartc.html#AEN2241 1) tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate ${UPLINK}kbit burst 6k prio 1 ^^^^^^ AND 2) tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 10 u32 match ip tos 0x10 0xff flowid 1:10